A systematic review of comparative efficacy of treatments and controls for depression.
<h4>Background</h4>Although previous meta-analyses have examined effects of antidepressants, psychotherapy, and alternative therapies for depression, the efficacy of these treatments alone and in combination has not been systematically compared. We hypothesized that the differences betwe...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Arif Khan, James Faucett, Pesach Lichtenberg, Irving Kirsch, Walter A Brown |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0041778&type=printable |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of acupuncture for adolescent depression: protocol for a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
by: Jiayu Zhang, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Efficacy and Safety of Pentoxifylline in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
by: Omar Kassar, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Comparative Safety of Pharmacologic Treatments for Persistent Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
by: Ramona Meister, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Efficacy of mobile applications in treating depression: systemic review and meta-analysis
by: Eiman Araib, et al. -
Psychological Treatment of Depression in People Aged 65 Years and Over: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness.
by: Ulf Jonsson, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)