Effects of Essential Oils in the Treatment of Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT Objective Basic science studies have shown that essential oils have antibacterial and anti‐inflammatory effects in the nasal mucosa. However, clinical studies examining the effect of essential oils on patient outcomes are limited. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina M. Matl, Wooyoung Jang, Jordan R. Salley, Callie L. Fort, Joshua C. Demke, Phat Tran, James C. Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70189
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839651095202234368
author Christina M. Matl
Wooyoung Jang
Jordan R. Salley
Callie L. Fort
Joshua C. Demke
Phat Tran
James C. Wang
author_facet Christina M. Matl
Wooyoung Jang
Jordan R. Salley
Callie L. Fort
Joshua C. Demke
Phat Tran
James C. Wang
author_sort Christina M. Matl
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objective Basic science studies have shown that essential oils have antibacterial and anti‐inflammatory effects in the nasal mucosa. However, clinical studies examining the effect of essential oils on patient outcomes are limited. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the patient outcomes following treatment of acute rhinosinusitis with essential oils. Methods PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and Embase computerized searches were performed to include results published up to December 2023. Two independent reviewers (C.M.M. and W.J.) conducted data extraction following a predetermined protocol, with any discrepancies reviewed by the senior author (J.C.W.). Results Five RCTs investigated the treatment of rhinosinusitis with essential oils in capsule form. Essential oils included in the studies were Cineole, Myrtol (ELOM‐080), Sinupret (BNO 1016), and Tavipec. Significant improvements in rhinological symptoms were seen in Cinole compared to placebo, Cinole compared to an herbal compound similar in composition to Sinupret, Tavipec compared to placebo, and ELOM‐080 compared to placebo. Outcome measures included nasal obstruction, nasal drainage, facial pressure, headache, fatigue, and fever. Little difference in patient‐reported rhinological symptom improvement was seen in ELOM‐080 compared to BNO 1016 using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Minimal adverse effects were observed in patients treated with essential oils with the most common adverse effect being mild gastrointestinal upset. Conclusion Patients using essential oils reported improvement in acute rhinosinusitis symptoms in all studies reviewed, despite differences in methodology and outcome measures. These improvements were statistically significant in all the studies. Level of Evidence Level 1 based on “The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence”.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee02b1c767874fb5a6aa3e17bbb44b09
institution Matheson Library
issn 2378-8038
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
spelling doaj-art-ee02b1c767874fb5a6aa3e17bbb44b092025-06-26T12:04:48ZengWileyLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology2378-80382025-06-01103n/an/a10.1002/lio2.70189Effects of Essential Oils in the Treatment of Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic ReviewChristina M. Matl0Wooyoung Jang1Jordan R. Salley2Callie L. Fort3Joshua C. Demke4Phat Tran5James C. Wang6Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine Lubbock Texas USATexas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine Lubbock Texas USADepartment of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of Texas Southwestern Medical School Dallas Texas USATexas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine Lubbock Texas USADepartment of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Lubbock Texas USADepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Lubbock Texas USADivision of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USAABSTRACT Objective Basic science studies have shown that essential oils have antibacterial and anti‐inflammatory effects in the nasal mucosa. However, clinical studies examining the effect of essential oils on patient outcomes are limited. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the patient outcomes following treatment of acute rhinosinusitis with essential oils. Methods PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and Embase computerized searches were performed to include results published up to December 2023. Two independent reviewers (C.M.M. and W.J.) conducted data extraction following a predetermined protocol, with any discrepancies reviewed by the senior author (J.C.W.). Results Five RCTs investigated the treatment of rhinosinusitis with essential oils in capsule form. Essential oils included in the studies were Cineole, Myrtol (ELOM‐080), Sinupret (BNO 1016), and Tavipec. Significant improvements in rhinological symptoms were seen in Cinole compared to placebo, Cinole compared to an herbal compound similar in composition to Sinupret, Tavipec compared to placebo, and ELOM‐080 compared to placebo. Outcome measures included nasal obstruction, nasal drainage, facial pressure, headache, fatigue, and fever. Little difference in patient‐reported rhinological symptom improvement was seen in ELOM‐080 compared to BNO 1016 using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Minimal adverse effects were observed in patients treated with essential oils with the most common adverse effect being mild gastrointestinal upset. Conclusion Patients using essential oils reported improvement in acute rhinosinusitis symptoms in all studies reviewed, despite differences in methodology and outcome measures. These improvements were statistically significant in all the studies. Level of Evidence Level 1 based on “The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence”.https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70189essential oilsnasal mucosaparanasal sinusesrhinitissinusitis
spellingShingle Christina M. Matl
Wooyoung Jang
Jordan R. Salley
Callie L. Fort
Joshua C. Demke
Phat Tran
James C. Wang
Effects of Essential Oils in the Treatment of Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
essential oils
nasal mucosa
paranasal sinuses
rhinitis
sinusitis
title Effects of Essential Oils in the Treatment of Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review
title_full Effects of Essential Oils in the Treatment of Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effects of Essential Oils in the Treatment of Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Essential Oils in the Treatment of Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review
title_short Effects of Essential Oils in the Treatment of Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review
title_sort effects of essential oils in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis a systematic review
topic essential oils
nasal mucosa
paranasal sinuses
rhinitis
sinusitis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70189
work_keys_str_mv AT christinammatl effectsofessentialoilsinthetreatmentofacuterhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT wooyoungjang effectsofessentialoilsinthetreatmentofacuterhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT jordanrsalley effectsofessentialoilsinthetreatmentofacuterhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT callielfort effectsofessentialoilsinthetreatmentofacuterhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT joshuacdemke effectsofessentialoilsinthetreatmentofacuterhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT phattran effectsofessentialoilsinthetreatmentofacuterhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT jamescwang effectsofessentialoilsinthetreatmentofacuterhinosinusitisasystematicreview