Unlocking Student Choices: Assessing Student Preferences in Courses in Engineering Education

Effective resource planning in higher education requires anticipating student demand for courses, especially when dealing with elective programs. Monitoring student preference is a recurring topic in the literature; however, to the authors’ knowledge, no simple methods for estimating student prefere...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patricia Mares-Nasarre, Niels van Boldrik, Elske Bakker, Robert Lanzafame, Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/7/859
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839616124382085120
author Patricia Mares-Nasarre
Niels van Boldrik
Elske Bakker
Robert Lanzafame
Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles
author_facet Patricia Mares-Nasarre
Niels van Boldrik
Elske Bakker
Robert Lanzafame
Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles
author_sort Patricia Mares-Nasarre
collection DOAJ
description Effective resource planning in higher education requires anticipating student demand for courses, especially when dealing with elective programs. Monitoring student preference is a recurring topic in the literature; however, to the authors’ knowledge, no simple methods for estimating student preferences when choosing courses in higher education have been proposed. This study develops and explores the use of a simple questionnaire to capture patterns in student course preferences within a university context. The research is developed in the context of the nine Cross-Over modules offered as part of the curriculum of the master’s programs (MSc) of the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences of Delft University of Technology (The Netherlands). No prior registration is required far in advance for these courses, making an accurate estimation of student numbers critical for the planning and allocation of educational resources. The developed questionnaire is applied three times in two different academic years to the students’ choice of Cross-Over modules. The questionnaire was shared in 2021, with 225 responses out of 339 students, in 2022, with 159 responses out of 365 students, and in 2024, with 94 responses out of 272 students. Student enrollment in the academic year 2023/2024 is used to assess the performance of the questionnaire. The questionnaire is able to capture general preferences of the students, providing fair estimates of the number of students per course; larger differences are observed in courses with a lower number of students. In addition, some patterns were identified in student preferences: there is a relationship between the first and second choices, and students usually choose modules closer to their own disciplines. The developed questionnaire provides with a reasonable first estimation of the expected number of students in courses, allowing for better planning and allocation of educational resources beforehand.
format Article
id doaj-art-ec59e483912d4f34a84dec40f1092f21
institution Matheson Library
issn 2227-7102
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj-art-ec59e483912d4f34a84dec40f1092f212025-07-25T13:20:44ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022025-07-0115785910.3390/educsci15070859Unlocking Student Choices: Assessing Student Preferences in Courses in Engineering EducationPatricia Mares-Nasarre0Niels van Boldrik1Elske Bakker2Robert Lanzafame3Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles4Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The NetherlandsEffective resource planning in higher education requires anticipating student demand for courses, especially when dealing with elective programs. Monitoring student preference is a recurring topic in the literature; however, to the authors’ knowledge, no simple methods for estimating student preferences when choosing courses in higher education have been proposed. This study develops and explores the use of a simple questionnaire to capture patterns in student course preferences within a university context. The research is developed in the context of the nine Cross-Over modules offered as part of the curriculum of the master’s programs (MSc) of the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences of Delft University of Technology (The Netherlands). No prior registration is required far in advance for these courses, making an accurate estimation of student numbers critical for the planning and allocation of educational resources. The developed questionnaire is applied three times in two different academic years to the students’ choice of Cross-Over modules. The questionnaire was shared in 2021, with 225 responses out of 339 students, in 2022, with 159 responses out of 365 students, and in 2024, with 94 responses out of 272 students. Student enrollment in the academic year 2023/2024 is used to assess the performance of the questionnaire. The questionnaire is able to capture general preferences of the students, providing fair estimates of the number of students per course; larger differences are observed in courses with a lower number of students. In addition, some patterns were identified in student preferences: there is a relationship between the first and second choices, and students usually choose modules closer to their own disciplines. The developed questionnaire provides with a reasonable first estimation of the expected number of students in courses, allowing for better planning and allocation of educational resources beforehand.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/7/859student preferenceshigher educationprobabilityuniversityengineering educationstudent choices
spellingShingle Patricia Mares-Nasarre
Niels van Boldrik
Elske Bakker
Robert Lanzafame
Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles
Unlocking Student Choices: Assessing Student Preferences in Courses in Engineering Education
Education Sciences
student preferences
higher education
probability
university
engineering education
student choices
title Unlocking Student Choices: Assessing Student Preferences in Courses in Engineering Education
title_full Unlocking Student Choices: Assessing Student Preferences in Courses in Engineering Education
title_fullStr Unlocking Student Choices: Assessing Student Preferences in Courses in Engineering Education
title_full_unstemmed Unlocking Student Choices: Assessing Student Preferences in Courses in Engineering Education
title_short Unlocking Student Choices: Assessing Student Preferences in Courses in Engineering Education
title_sort unlocking student choices assessing student preferences in courses in engineering education
topic student preferences
higher education
probability
university
engineering education
student choices
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/7/859
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciamaresnasarre unlockingstudentchoicesassessingstudentpreferencesincoursesinengineeringeducation
AT nielsvanboldrik unlockingstudentchoicesassessingstudentpreferencesincoursesinengineeringeducation
AT elskebakker unlockingstudentchoicesassessingstudentpreferencesincoursesinengineeringeducation
AT robertlanzafame unlockingstudentchoicesassessingstudentpreferencesincoursesinengineeringeducation
AT oswaldomoralesnapoles unlockingstudentchoicesassessingstudentpreferencesincoursesinengineeringeducation