Three stages of laboratory stewardship in improving appropriate Clostridioides difficile testing in a community-based setting

Abstract Objective: Assess the efficacy of staged interventions aimed to reduce inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing and hospital-onset C. difficile infection (HO-CDI) rates. Design: Interrupted time series. Setting: Community-based. Methods/Interventions: National Healthcare Safet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael S. Wang, Gretchen Zimmerman, Theresa Klein, Bethany Stibbe, Monica Rykse, Samuel Ballard, Naveen Vijayam, Joe Brown, Khateeb Raza, Shannon Beckman, Andrew M. Skinner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2732494X25000555/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective: Assess the efficacy of staged interventions aimed to reduce inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing and hospital-onset C. difficile infection (HO-CDI) rates. Design: Interrupted time series. Setting: Community-based. Methods/Interventions: National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) C. difficile metrics from January 2019 to November 2022 were analyzed after three interventions at a community-based healthcare system. Interventions included: (1) an electronic medical record (EMR) based hard stop requiring confirming ≥3 loose or liquid stools over 24 h, (2) an infectious diseases (ID) review and approval of testing >3 days of hospital admission, and (3) an infection control practitioner (ICP) reviews combined with switching to a reverse two-tiered clinical testing algorithm. Results: After all interventions, the number of C. difficile tests per 1,000 patient-days (PD) and HO-CDI cases per 10,000 PD decreased from 20.53 to 6.92 and 9.80 to 0.20, respectively. The EMR hard stop resulted in a (28%) reduction in the CDI testing rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio ((aIRR): 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.96)) and ID review resulted in a (42%) reduction in the CDI testing rate (aIRR: 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42–0.79). Changing to the reverse testing algorithm reduced reported HO-CDI rate by (95%) (cIRR: 0.05; 95% CI; 0.01–0.40). Conclusions: Staged interventions aimed at improving diagnostic stewardship were effective in overall reducing CDI testing in a community healthcare system.
ISSN:2732-494X