Comparative Benefits of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Onsite Fibrinolytic for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Quasi‐Experimental Study

Comparative Benefits of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Onsite Fibrinolytic for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Quasi‐Experimental Study

Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy compared with onsite fibrinolytic therapy (O‐FT) for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction when delivered promptly. However, the contemporaneous data to inform the comparative benefits of primary P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuduo Zhou, Siwei Xie, Binquan You, Dingcheng Xiang, Weiyi Fang, Michael G. Trisolini, Kenneth A. Labresh, Sidney C. Smith, Zhi‐Jie Zheng, Yinzi Jin, Feng Liu, Yong Huo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
comparative research
fibrinolysis
myocardial infarction
percutaneous coronary intervention
transfer
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.125.041995
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Login for hold and recall information

Internet

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.125.041995

Similar Items