Person centered care for primary ovarian insufficiency: developing and testing patient-facing materials co-created with patients
ObjectiveWe aimed to enhance person-centered care for primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) by co-creating patient-facing educational materials (PEM) with patients. We then evaluated understandability, actionability, and acceptability of the co-created PEM.DesignHealthcare professionals spanning repro...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Communication |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1509966/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | ObjectiveWe aimed to enhance person-centered care for primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) by co-creating patient-facing educational materials (PEM) with patients. We then evaluated understandability, actionability, and acceptability of the co-created PEM.DesignHealthcare professionals spanning reproductive endocrinology, nursing, and genetic counseling partnered with patients to co-create PEM using the iterative ‘design thinking’ (human-centered design) process. Validated algorithms (n = 8) were employed to determine PEM readability prior to evaluation. Individuals with POI were recruited from patient organizations to complete the online evaluation of PEM. Participants completed health literacy/numeracy instruments, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for print materials (PEMAT-P), and provided open-ended qualitative feedback. Scores >80% in PEMAT-P domains were considered ‘high quality’.ResultsCo-creation involved three iterative rounds of development. Readability algorithms indicated PEM were ‘fairly easy to read’ for 11- to 13-year-olds (i.e., 7th grade reading level). Thirty patients completed the online evaluation (36.9 ± 6.4 years-old). All PEMAT-P domains exceeded the ‘high quality’ threshold: content (82%), word choice/style (89%), use of numbers (91%), organization (93%), layout/design (90%), use of visual aids (83%), and actionability (85%). PEMAT-P scores neither differed according to educational attainment (p = 0.94) nor health literacy/numeracy (p = 0.61). Qualitative feedback informed further PEM refinement prior to widespread dissemination and clinical use.ConclusionEngaging patients with POI in co-creation produced PEM that were acceptable, understandable, and actionable. Co-creation is a low-cost engagement process supporting person-centered care. The process described herein may serve as a “roadmap” guiding PEM development for other reproductive conditions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2297-900X |