Clinical Outcomes of Skeletal Anchorage Versus Conventional Anchorage in the Class III Orthopaedic Treatment in Growing Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical Outcomes of Skeletal Anchorage Versus Conventional Anchorage in the Class III Orthopaedic Treatment in Growing Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of skeletal anchorage, compared to conventional anchorage, in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion in growing patients. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A specific search strategy was de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachele Podda, Francesca Imondi, Adriana Assunta De Stefano, Martina Horodynski, Roberto Antonio Vernucci, Gabriella Galluccio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2025-06-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
class iii malocclusion
orthodontic anchorage procedures
orthodontic appliances
interceptive treatment
bone anchored maxillary protraction (bamp)
Online Access:https://turkjorthod.org/articles/clinical-outcomes-of-skeletal-anchorage-versus-conventional-anchorage-in-the-class-iii-orthopaedic-treatment-in-growing-patients-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/doi/TurkJOrthod.2025.2024.38
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Login for hold and recall information

Internet

https://turkjorthod.org/articles/clinical-outcomes-of-skeletal-anchorage-versus-conventional-anchorage-in-the-class-iii-orthopaedic-treatment-in-growing-patients-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/doi/TurkJOrthod.2025.2024.38

Similar Items