Image Quality Assessment of Augmented Reality Glasses as Medical Display Devices (HoloLens 2)
See-through augmented reality glasses, such as HoloLens 2, are increasingly adopted in medical settings; however, their efficacy as medical display devices remains unclear, as current evaluation protocols are designed for traditional monitors. This study examined whether the established display-eval...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-07-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/14/7648 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | See-through augmented reality glasses, such as HoloLens 2, are increasingly adopted in medical settings; however, their efficacy as medical display devices remains unclear, as current evaluation protocols are designed for traditional monitors. This study examined whether the established display-evaluation techniques apply to HoloLens 2 and whether it meets standards for primary and secondary medical displays. HoloLens 2 was assessed for overall image quality, luminance, grayscale consistency, and color uniformity. Five participants rated the TG18-OIQ pattern under ambient lighting conditions of 2.4 and 138.7 lx. Minimum and maximum luminance were measured using the TG18-LN12-03 and -18 patterns, targeting ≥ 300 cd/m<sup>2</sup> and a luminance ratio ≥ 250. Grayscale conformity to the standard grayscale display function allowed deviations of 10% for primary and 20% for secondary displays. Color uniformity was measured at five screen positions for red, green, and blue, with a chromaticity limit of 0.01 for primary displays. HoloLens 2 satisfied four of the ten primary and four of the seven secondary overall-quality criteria, achieving a maximum luminance of 2366 cd/m<sup>2</sup> and a luminance ratio of 1478.75. Grayscale uniformity was within tolerance for 10 of the 15 primary and 13 of the 15 secondary measurements, while 25 of the 30 color uniformity values exceeded the threshold. The adapted evaluation methods facilitate a systematic assessment of HoloLens 2 as a medical display. Owing to inadequate grayscale and color representation, the headset is unsuitable as a primary diagnostic display; for secondary use, requirements must be assessed based on specific application requirements. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2076-3417 |