Psychometric validation of the Turkish expanded mindful eating scale.

<h4>Background/objectives</h4>The Expanded Mindful Eating Scale (EMES) assesses mindfulness by considering both individual health and environmental sustainability. A distinguishing feature of the EMES is its inclusion of sustainability, setting it apart from other eating awareness scales...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gökcen Doğan, Eda Çakmak, Ceren Şarahman Kahraman, Nurcan Yabanci Ayhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328175
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839623137390493696
author Gökcen Doğan
Eda Çakmak
Ceren Şarahman Kahraman
Nurcan Yabanci Ayhan
author_facet Gökcen Doğan
Eda Çakmak
Ceren Şarahman Kahraman
Nurcan Yabanci Ayhan
author_sort Gökcen Doğan
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background/objectives</h4>The Expanded Mindful Eating Scale (EMES) assesses mindfulness by considering both individual health and environmental sustainability. A distinguishing feature of the EMES is its inclusion of sustainability, setting it apart from other eating awareness scales. This study was carried out to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish culture-adapted version of the EMES in adults.<h4>Materials/methods</h4>In this cross-sectional study, 662 Turkish adults (mean age=29.8, SD=12.18; 18.4% male) were recruited via an online questionnaire. In this study, participants were recruited via an online survey that included their sociodemographic characteristics, the EMES, Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ), and sick, control, one, fat, food (SCOFF) Eating Disorders Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the validity of the EMES. Analyses were conducted using SPSS version 25.0 and SPSS AMOS version 25.0. The 5-factor structure identified by Explanatory Factor Analysis (EFA) was validated using CFA.<h4>Results</h4>As a result of confirmatory factor analysis (RMSEA: 0.053, CFI: 0.89, GFI: 0.94, and AGFI: 0.92), model fit indices were obtained within acceptable limits. In the reliability analysis, it was observed that the EMES scale had a good level of reliability with the Spearman-Brown coefficient. A significant correlation was observed between the EMES and MEQ.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The results showed that the use of the Turkish version of the EMES is valid and reliable. It is thought that the validation of the Expanded Mindful Eating Scale reflects a comprehensive approach that recognizes the interconnectedness of individual health and environmental well-being.
format Article
id doaj-art-fd4b68fbb8f849a8a090e82dae5246d3
institution Matheson Library
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-fd4b68fbb8f849a8a090e82dae5246d32025-07-21T05:31:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01207e032817510.1371/journal.pone.0328175Psychometric validation of the Turkish expanded mindful eating scale.Gökcen DoğanEda ÇakmakCeren Şarahman KahramanNurcan Yabanci Ayhan<h4>Background/objectives</h4>The Expanded Mindful Eating Scale (EMES) assesses mindfulness by considering both individual health and environmental sustainability. A distinguishing feature of the EMES is its inclusion of sustainability, setting it apart from other eating awareness scales. This study was carried out to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish culture-adapted version of the EMES in adults.<h4>Materials/methods</h4>In this cross-sectional study, 662 Turkish adults (mean age=29.8, SD=12.18; 18.4% male) were recruited via an online questionnaire. In this study, participants were recruited via an online survey that included their sociodemographic characteristics, the EMES, Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ), and sick, control, one, fat, food (SCOFF) Eating Disorders Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the validity of the EMES. Analyses were conducted using SPSS version 25.0 and SPSS AMOS version 25.0. The 5-factor structure identified by Explanatory Factor Analysis (EFA) was validated using CFA.<h4>Results</h4>As a result of confirmatory factor analysis (RMSEA: 0.053, CFI: 0.89, GFI: 0.94, and AGFI: 0.92), model fit indices were obtained within acceptable limits. In the reliability analysis, it was observed that the EMES scale had a good level of reliability with the Spearman-Brown coefficient. A significant correlation was observed between the EMES and MEQ.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The results showed that the use of the Turkish version of the EMES is valid and reliable. It is thought that the validation of the Expanded Mindful Eating Scale reflects a comprehensive approach that recognizes the interconnectedness of individual health and environmental well-being.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328175
spellingShingle Gökcen Doğan
Eda Çakmak
Ceren Şarahman Kahraman
Nurcan Yabanci Ayhan
Psychometric validation of the Turkish expanded mindful eating scale.
PLoS ONE
title Psychometric validation of the Turkish expanded mindful eating scale.
title_full Psychometric validation of the Turkish expanded mindful eating scale.
title_fullStr Psychometric validation of the Turkish expanded mindful eating scale.
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric validation of the Turkish expanded mindful eating scale.
title_short Psychometric validation of the Turkish expanded mindful eating scale.
title_sort psychometric validation of the turkish expanded mindful eating scale
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328175
work_keys_str_mv AT gokcendogan psychometricvalidationoftheturkishexpandedmindfuleatingscale
AT edacakmak psychometricvalidationoftheturkishexpandedmindfuleatingscale
AT cerensarahmankahraman psychometricvalidationoftheturkishexpandedmindfuleatingscale
AT nurcanyabanciayhan psychometricvalidationoftheturkishexpandedmindfuleatingscale