Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the impact of a glide-path on the shaping ability of 2 single-file instruments and to compare the centering ability, maintenance of original canal curvatures and area of instrumentation in simulated S-shaped root canals.Materials and MethodsForty simulated S-shap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vincenzo Biasillo, Raffaella Castagnola, Mauro Colangeli, Claudia Panzetta, Irene Minciacchi, Gianluca Plotino, Simone Staffoli, Luca Marigo, Nicola Maria Grande
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2022-02-01
Series:Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.rde.ac/upload/pdf/rde-47-e3.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839641697048330240
author Vincenzo Biasillo
Raffaella Castagnola
Mauro Colangeli
Claudia Panzetta
Irene Minciacchi
Gianluca Plotino
Simone Staffoli
Luca Marigo
Nicola Maria Grande
author_facet Vincenzo Biasillo
Raffaella Castagnola
Mauro Colangeli
Claudia Panzetta
Irene Minciacchi
Gianluca Plotino
Simone Staffoli
Luca Marigo
Nicola Maria Grande
author_sort Vincenzo Biasillo
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the impact of a glide-path on the shaping ability of 2 single-file instruments and to compare the centering ability, maintenance of original canal curvatures and area of instrumentation in simulated S-shaped root canals.Materials and MethodsForty simulated S-shaped root canals were used and were prepared with One Curve (group OC), One G and OC (group GOC), Reciproc Blue (group RB) and R-Pilot and RB (group PRB) and scanned before and after instrumentation. The images were analyzed using AutoCAD. After superimposing the samples, 4 levels (D1, D2, D3, and D4) and 2 angles (Δ1 and Δ2) were established to evaluate the centering ability and modification of the canal curvatures. Then, the area of instrumentation (ΔA) was measured. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).ResultsRegarding the centering ability in the apical part (D3, D4), the use of the glide-path yielded better results than the single-file groups. Among the groups at D4, OC showed the worst results (p < 0.05). The OC system removed less material (ΔA) than the RB system, and for Δ1, OC yielded a worse result than RB (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe glide-path improved the centering ability in the apical part of the simulated S-shaped canals. The RB system showed a better centering ability in the apical part and major respect of the canal curvatures compared with OC system.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa694bb3b1cf4a13a3fce0ab38d9fdcf
institution Matheson Library
issn 2234-7658
2234-7666
language English
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
record_format Article
series Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
spelling doaj-art-fa694bb3b1cf4a13a3fce0ab38d9fdcf2025-07-03T05:28:54ZengKorean Academy of Conservative DentistryRestorative Dentistry & Endodontics2234-76582234-76662022-02-01471e310.5395/rde.2022.47.e31027Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canalsVincenzo Biasillo0Raffaella Castagnola1Mauro Colangeli2Claudia Panzetta3Irene Minciacchi4Gianluca Plotino5Simone Staffoli6Luca Marigo7Nicola Maria Grande8Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCS, School of Dentistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCS, School of Dentistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCS, School of Dentistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyPhysics Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCS, School of Dentistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyPrivate practice, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCS, School of Dentistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCS, School of Dentistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the impact of a glide-path on the shaping ability of 2 single-file instruments and to compare the centering ability, maintenance of original canal curvatures and area of instrumentation in simulated S-shaped root canals.Materials and MethodsForty simulated S-shaped root canals were used and were prepared with One Curve (group OC), One G and OC (group GOC), Reciproc Blue (group RB) and R-Pilot and RB (group PRB) and scanned before and after instrumentation. The images were analyzed using AutoCAD. After superimposing the samples, 4 levels (D1, D2, D3, and D4) and 2 angles (Δ1 and Δ2) were established to evaluate the centering ability and modification of the canal curvatures. Then, the area of instrumentation (ΔA) was measured. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).ResultsRegarding the centering ability in the apical part (D3, D4), the use of the glide-path yielded better results than the single-file groups. Among the groups at D4, OC showed the worst results (p < 0.05). The OC system removed less material (ΔA) than the RB system, and for Δ1, OC yielded a worse result than RB (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe glide-path improved the centering ability in the apical part of the simulated S-shaped canals. The RB system showed a better centering ability in the apical part and major respect of the canal curvatures compared with OC system.http://www.rde.ac/upload/pdf/rde-47-e3.pdfcentering abilityglide-pathinstrumentationroot canal preparation
spellingShingle Vincenzo Biasillo
Raffaella Castagnola
Mauro Colangeli
Claudia Panzetta
Irene Minciacchi
Gianluca Plotino
Simone Staffoli
Luca Marigo
Nicola Maria Grande
Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
centering ability
glide-path
instrumentation
root canal preparation
title Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_full Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_fullStr Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_short Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_sort comparison of shaping ability of the reciproc blue and one curve with or without glide path in simulated s shaped root canals
topic centering ability
glide-path
instrumentation
root canal preparation
url http://www.rde.ac/upload/pdf/rde-47-e3.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vincenzobiasillo comparisonofshapingabilityofthereciprocblueandonecurvewithorwithoutglidepathinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT raffaellacastagnola comparisonofshapingabilityofthereciprocblueandonecurvewithorwithoutglidepathinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT maurocolangeli comparisonofshapingabilityofthereciprocblueandonecurvewithorwithoutglidepathinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT claudiapanzetta comparisonofshapingabilityofthereciprocblueandonecurvewithorwithoutglidepathinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT ireneminciacchi comparisonofshapingabilityofthereciprocblueandonecurvewithorwithoutglidepathinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT gianlucaplotino comparisonofshapingabilityofthereciprocblueandonecurvewithorwithoutglidepathinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT simonestaffoli comparisonofshapingabilityofthereciprocblueandonecurvewithorwithoutglidepathinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT lucamarigo comparisonofshapingabilityofthereciprocblueandonecurvewithorwithoutglidepathinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT nicolamariagrande comparisonofshapingabilityofthereciprocblueandonecurvewithorwithoutglidepathinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals