Underlying Diagnosis of Food Bolus Obstruction Acute Admissions to Otorhinolaryngology: A Shift to Provide the Best Care as per the Current Guidelines

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> In the United Kingdom, some patients with food bolus obstruction (FBO) are admitted under the care of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) doctors. In the literature, eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is the most common cause of FBO. We analysed ENT FBO admissions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasads Misirovs, Anna Kamusella, Michael Miller, Samit Majumdar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/6/1047
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839653411717382144
author Rasads Misirovs
Anna Kamusella
Michael Miller
Samit Majumdar
author_facet Rasads Misirovs
Anna Kamusella
Michael Miller
Samit Majumdar
author_sort Rasads Misirovs
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background and Objectives:</i> In the United Kingdom, some patients with food bolus obstruction (FBO) are admitted under the care of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) doctors. In the literature, eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is the most common cause of FBO. We analysed ENT FBO admissions and interventions used in our hospital to investigate for EoE. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This paper details a retrospective study of adult FBO admissions to an ENT ward from January 2016 to December 2019 at a single centre. <i>Results:</i> In total, 120 patients were admitted. Half of the patients required instrumentation to resolve the obstruction—31% underwent rigid oesophagoscopy (RO) and 69% oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD). Biopsies were taken during 48% of inpatient OGDs and 5% of ROs. 48% had a histopathological diagnosis of EoE. There was no mention of a specific number of eosinophils per high-power field in 53% of EoE pathology reports. Potentially, some patients were EoE-negative due to an inadequate number of biopsies taken—71% of patients had an insufficient number of biopsies to exclude EoE. A total of 56% of all patients with FBO did not undergo inpatient or outpatient OGDs with biopsies. <i>Conclusions:</i> Biopsies were not taken in all FBO patients undergoing oesophagoscopy, leaving EoE underdiagnosed. Follow-up arrangements were often suboptimal to exclude EoE.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa25ffab5a3a4a5c9d0eb1e6604cd855
institution Matheson Library
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj-art-fa25ffab5a3a4a5c9d0eb1e6604cd8552025-06-25T14:09:43ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442025-06-01616104710.3390/medicina61061047Underlying Diagnosis of Food Bolus Obstruction Acute Admissions to Otorhinolaryngology: A Shift to Provide the Best Care as per the Current GuidelinesRasads Misirovs0Anna Kamusella1Michael Miller2Samit Majumdar3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UKDepartment of Psychiatry, Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh EH10 5HF, UKDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee DD1 9SY, UKDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<i>Background and Objectives:</i> In the United Kingdom, some patients with food bolus obstruction (FBO) are admitted under the care of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) doctors. In the literature, eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is the most common cause of FBO. We analysed ENT FBO admissions and interventions used in our hospital to investigate for EoE. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This paper details a retrospective study of adult FBO admissions to an ENT ward from January 2016 to December 2019 at a single centre. <i>Results:</i> In total, 120 patients were admitted. Half of the patients required instrumentation to resolve the obstruction—31% underwent rigid oesophagoscopy (RO) and 69% oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD). Biopsies were taken during 48% of inpatient OGDs and 5% of ROs. 48% had a histopathological diagnosis of EoE. There was no mention of a specific number of eosinophils per high-power field in 53% of EoE pathology reports. Potentially, some patients were EoE-negative due to an inadequate number of biopsies taken—71% of patients had an insufficient number of biopsies to exclude EoE. A total of 56% of all patients with FBO did not undergo inpatient or outpatient OGDs with biopsies. <i>Conclusions:</i> Biopsies were not taken in all FBO patients undergoing oesophagoscopy, leaving EoE underdiagnosed. Follow-up arrangements were often suboptimal to exclude EoE.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/6/1047oesophagogastroduodenoscopydysphagiaswallowing disordereosinophilic esophagitisbiopsy
spellingShingle Rasads Misirovs
Anna Kamusella
Michael Miller
Samit Majumdar
Underlying Diagnosis of Food Bolus Obstruction Acute Admissions to Otorhinolaryngology: A Shift to Provide the Best Care as per the Current Guidelines
Medicina
oesophagogastroduodenoscopy
dysphagia
swallowing disorder
eosinophilic esophagitis
biopsy
title Underlying Diagnosis of Food Bolus Obstruction Acute Admissions to Otorhinolaryngology: A Shift to Provide the Best Care as per the Current Guidelines
title_full Underlying Diagnosis of Food Bolus Obstruction Acute Admissions to Otorhinolaryngology: A Shift to Provide the Best Care as per the Current Guidelines
title_fullStr Underlying Diagnosis of Food Bolus Obstruction Acute Admissions to Otorhinolaryngology: A Shift to Provide the Best Care as per the Current Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Underlying Diagnosis of Food Bolus Obstruction Acute Admissions to Otorhinolaryngology: A Shift to Provide the Best Care as per the Current Guidelines
title_short Underlying Diagnosis of Food Bolus Obstruction Acute Admissions to Otorhinolaryngology: A Shift to Provide the Best Care as per the Current Guidelines
title_sort underlying diagnosis of food bolus obstruction acute admissions to otorhinolaryngology a shift to provide the best care as per the current guidelines
topic oesophagogastroduodenoscopy
dysphagia
swallowing disorder
eosinophilic esophagitis
biopsy
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/6/1047
work_keys_str_mv AT rasadsmisirovs underlyingdiagnosisoffoodbolusobstructionacuteadmissionstootorhinolaryngologyashifttoprovidethebestcareasperthecurrentguidelines
AT annakamusella underlyingdiagnosisoffoodbolusobstructionacuteadmissionstootorhinolaryngologyashifttoprovidethebestcareasperthecurrentguidelines
AT michaelmiller underlyingdiagnosisoffoodbolusobstructionacuteadmissionstootorhinolaryngologyashifttoprovidethebestcareasperthecurrentguidelines
AT samitmajumdar underlyingdiagnosisoffoodbolusobstructionacuteadmissionstootorhinolaryngologyashifttoprovidethebestcareasperthecurrentguidelines