Genetic Structure and Diversity of Parental Cultivars Involved in China Mainland Sugarcane Breeding Programs as Inferred from DNA Microsatellites

To understand genetic structure and diversity of parental cultivars involved in China Mainland sugarcane breeding programs, 92 elite parents and 4 wild relatives were genotyped with 18 microsatellite DNA markers. The genetic similarity (GS) values among the cultivars ranged from 0.346 to 0.960 with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yong-wen QI, Yong-bao PAN, Fang-ye LAO, Chui-ming ZHANG, Li-na FAN, Hui-yi HE, Rui LIU, Qin-nan WANG, Shao-mou LIU, Fu-ye LIU, Qi-wei LI, Hai-hua DENG
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2012-11-01
Series:Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311912601841
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839594844253585408
author Yong-wen QI
Yong-bao PAN
Fang-ye LAO
Chui-ming ZHANG
Li-na FAN
Hui-yi HE
Rui LIU
Qin-nan WANG
Shao-mou LIU
Fu-ye LIU
Qi-wei LI
Hai-hua DENG
author_facet Yong-wen QI
Yong-bao PAN
Fang-ye LAO
Chui-ming ZHANG
Li-na FAN
Hui-yi HE
Rui LIU
Qin-nan WANG
Shao-mou LIU
Fu-ye LIU
Qi-wei LI
Hai-hua DENG
author_sort Yong-wen QI
collection DOAJ
description To understand genetic structure and diversity of parental cultivars involved in China Mainland sugarcane breeding programs, 92 elite parents and 4 wild relatives were genotyped with 18 microsatellite DNA markers. The genetic similarity (GS) values among the cultivars ranged from 0.346 to 0.960 with an average of 0.533. Among the introduced cultivars, India accessions had the closest genetic distance to China Mainland accessions (0.447), while Australia accessions have the furthest distance (0.503). A comparison of allelic diversity among geographical origins showed that there were 22 China Mainland specific alleles, of which 28% were derived from native S. spontaneaum germplasm in China. Model-based genetic structure, clustering, and principal components analyses consistently revealed there were five groups within the 96 accessions. Groups 1, 2, 4, and 5 consisted of all cultivars and group 3 only contained wild germplasm. Group 2 was characterized as the Introduction group with 46 cultivars predominantly introduced from Australia, Taiwan of China, India, and USA. Groups 1, 4, and 5 consisted of cultivars mostly originated from China Mainland, defined as the Complex group, Yacheng lines group, and F134/CP72-1210 group, respectively, upon their pedigree. By understanding the genetic relationships among the parental cultivars, breeders can gain a rational basis for expanding the gene pool and select the best parental accessions for crossing.
format Article
id doaj-art-f76a9b66e7f94f7ebb79dbc5c54a2e77
institution Matheson Library
issn 2095-3119
language English
publishDate 2012-11-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Journal of Integrative Agriculture
spelling doaj-art-f76a9b66e7f94f7ebb79dbc5c54a2e772025-08-02T23:45:40ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Journal of Integrative Agriculture2095-31192012-11-01111117941803Genetic Structure and Diversity of Parental Cultivars Involved in China Mainland Sugarcane Breeding Programs as Inferred from DNA MicrosatellitesYong-wen QI0Yong-bao PAN1Fang-ye LAO2Chui-ming ZHANG3Li-na FAN4Hui-yi HE5Rui LIU6Qin-nan WANG7Shao-mou LIU8Fu-ye LIU9Qi-wei LI10Hai-hua DENG11Guangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. China; QI Yong-wen, Tel: +86-20-84168434USDA-ARS, Mid-South Area, Sugarcane Research Laboratory, Houma 70360, USAGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Improvement and Biorefinery, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, P.R. China; Correspondence DENG Hai-hua, Tel: +86-20-84178327To understand genetic structure and diversity of parental cultivars involved in China Mainland sugarcane breeding programs, 92 elite parents and 4 wild relatives were genotyped with 18 microsatellite DNA markers. The genetic similarity (GS) values among the cultivars ranged from 0.346 to 0.960 with an average of 0.533. Among the introduced cultivars, India accessions had the closest genetic distance to China Mainland accessions (0.447), while Australia accessions have the furthest distance (0.503). A comparison of allelic diversity among geographical origins showed that there were 22 China Mainland specific alleles, of which 28% were derived from native S. spontaneaum germplasm in China. Model-based genetic structure, clustering, and principal components analyses consistently revealed there were five groups within the 96 accessions. Groups 1, 2, 4, and 5 consisted of all cultivars and group 3 only contained wild germplasm. Group 2 was characterized as the Introduction group with 46 cultivars predominantly introduced from Australia, Taiwan of China, India, and USA. Groups 1, 4, and 5 consisted of cultivars mostly originated from China Mainland, defined as the Complex group, Yacheng lines group, and F134/CP72-1210 group, respectively, upon their pedigree. By understanding the genetic relationships among the parental cultivars, breeders can gain a rational basis for expanding the gene pool and select the best parental accessions for crossing.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311912601841genetic diversitymicrosatellite DNA markerpopulation structuresugarcane
spellingShingle Yong-wen QI
Yong-bao PAN
Fang-ye LAO
Chui-ming ZHANG
Li-na FAN
Hui-yi HE
Rui LIU
Qin-nan WANG
Shao-mou LIU
Fu-ye LIU
Qi-wei LI
Hai-hua DENG
Genetic Structure and Diversity of Parental Cultivars Involved in China Mainland Sugarcane Breeding Programs as Inferred from DNA Microsatellites
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
genetic diversity
microsatellite DNA marker
population structure
sugarcane
title Genetic Structure and Diversity of Parental Cultivars Involved in China Mainland Sugarcane Breeding Programs as Inferred from DNA Microsatellites
title_full Genetic Structure and Diversity of Parental Cultivars Involved in China Mainland Sugarcane Breeding Programs as Inferred from DNA Microsatellites
title_fullStr Genetic Structure and Diversity of Parental Cultivars Involved in China Mainland Sugarcane Breeding Programs as Inferred from DNA Microsatellites
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Structure and Diversity of Parental Cultivars Involved in China Mainland Sugarcane Breeding Programs as Inferred from DNA Microsatellites
title_short Genetic Structure and Diversity of Parental Cultivars Involved in China Mainland Sugarcane Breeding Programs as Inferred from DNA Microsatellites
title_sort genetic structure and diversity of parental cultivars involved in china mainland sugarcane breeding programs as inferred from dna microsatellites
topic genetic diversity
microsatellite DNA marker
population structure
sugarcane
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311912601841
work_keys_str_mv AT yongwenqi geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT yongbaopan geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT fangyelao geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT chuimingzhang geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT linafan geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT huiyihe geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT ruiliu geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT qinnanwang geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT shaomouliu geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT fuyeliu geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT qiweili geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites
AT haihuadeng geneticstructureanddiversityofparentalcultivarsinvolvedinchinamainlandsugarcanebreedingprogramsasinferredfromdnamicrosatellites