On Gastronomic Jurisprudence and Judicial Wellness as a Matter of Competence
For over a century, critics have postulated that a judge’s state of hunger or post-prandial mental state is a determinant of judicial outcomes. This idea, known in contemporary discourse as the ‘judicial breakfast,’ is used as a surrogate of the larger ways in which biases, even if the individual is...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Alan C. Logan, Colleen M. Berryessa, Pragya Mishra, Susan L. Prescott |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
Series: | Laws |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/3/39 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Contemporary Challenges in Judicial Power and Judicial Systems: A Review of the II International Conference
by: Evgeny Y. Komlev, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
¿ELECCIÓN O JUSTICIA ABIERTA?COMO DAR LEGITIMIDAD AL PODER JUDICIAL EN EL CONTEXTO DE LA REFORMA EN MEXICO?
by: Laurence Pantin
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Economic decisionmaking structures and processes in Hungry: the delemmos of decentralization/
by: Knight, Peter T.
Published: (1984) -
The Principle of Self-Dependence of Judicial Authority in the Context of the Constitutional Reforms in the Republic of Armenia
by: Y. S. Tumanyants
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Diabetic Patients' Consumption of Diabetic and High Sugar Content Breakfast Products
by: Elis Ercan, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)