The making of rights of nature: nine patterns in a decade of empirical research on social-ecological drivers and actors
Rights of Nature (RoN) cases, where nature is granted legal rights, are rapidly gaining traction across the globe. Although there are many individual and comparative case studies, the extent to which emerging RoN cases share specific patterns that can be observed in the processes leading to the adop...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Research Communications |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ade5f2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839642160977149952 |
|---|---|
| author | Ilkhom Soliev Frauke Pirscher Marie Schreiber |
| author_facet | Ilkhom Soliev Frauke Pirscher Marie Schreiber |
| author_sort | Ilkhom Soliev |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Rights of Nature (RoN) cases, where nature is granted legal rights, are rapidly gaining traction across the globe. Although there are many individual and comparative case studies, the extent to which emerging RoN cases share specific patterns that can be observed in the processes leading to the adoption of RoN is yet to be understood. To fill this gap, we provide a systematic literature review of the decade of empirical research on the RoN. Building on the Institutional Analysis and Development framework, our review uses an in-depth analysis, with a special focus on eliciting evolving patterns across cases. The analysis demonstrated that the drivers of RoN processes are extraordinarily complex and case-specific, shaping our understanding of RoN itself. The identified nine patterns show that understanding RoN as a ‘revolutionary ecocentric movement’ is too simplistic, and it should rather be understood as a boundary object that connects place-based non-human and human well-being and relations, as well as formal and informal institutional conditions. The review revealed that themes such as justice, property rights, and personal engagement of powerful actors have been key in driving RoN cases worldwide. Likewise, contrary to the conventional perception, concern for the environment is not a common driver of RoN, and Indigenous or local communities cannot be universally and simply described as advocating actors for RoN, while undoubtedly it is often their interests that are most affected by RoN reforms. However, RoN-related rules tend to create space for questioning the purely instrumental and short-term perspectives towards nature and for redirecting the focus to relational and representational thinking. We found that disciplinary silos contributed to the historically veiled image of RoN due to insufficient engagement with interdisciplinary and decolonizing research methods. The revealed patterns can guide scholars, practitioners, and policymakers in rapidly growing cases worldwide to learn from the existing empirical knowledge. Our study is particularly valuable in times when multiple local-to-global and increasingly acute challenges around nature and biodiversity are putting pressure on societies to develop more ‘fundamental’ or ‘transformative’ approaches bridging science, policy, and practice and especially those that can better integrate diverse knowledge systems of Indigenous and local communities. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f45d04baff4b4f7bbf4925eb5b37988c |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 2515-7620 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Environmental Research Communications |
| spelling | doaj-art-f45d04baff4b4f7bbf4925eb5b37988c2025-07-02T15:48:31ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Communications2515-76202025-01-017707200110.1088/2515-7620/ade5f2The making of rights of nature: nine patterns in a decade of empirical research on social-ecological drivers and actorsIlkhom Soliev0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6780-2038Frauke Pirscher1Marie Schreiber2https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5791-1120Department of Environmental Sociology, Institute of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy I: Social Sciences and Historical Cultural Studies, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg , Emil-Abderhalden-Str. 26-27, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany; Social Learning and Environmental Governance (SLEG) Lab, Centre for Interdisciplinary Regional Studies (ZIRS), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg , Reichardtstr. 6, 06114 Halle (Saale), Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Puschstr. 4, 04103 Leipzig, GermanyInstitute for Agricultural and Food Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg , Karl-Freiherr-von-Fritsch-Straße 4, 06120 Halle (Saale), GermanyWilderness International, 108-4301B Southpark Drive 345, Stony Plain, AB, T7Z2A9, CanadaRights of Nature (RoN) cases, where nature is granted legal rights, are rapidly gaining traction across the globe. Although there are many individual and comparative case studies, the extent to which emerging RoN cases share specific patterns that can be observed in the processes leading to the adoption of RoN is yet to be understood. To fill this gap, we provide a systematic literature review of the decade of empirical research on the RoN. Building on the Institutional Analysis and Development framework, our review uses an in-depth analysis, with a special focus on eliciting evolving patterns across cases. The analysis demonstrated that the drivers of RoN processes are extraordinarily complex and case-specific, shaping our understanding of RoN itself. The identified nine patterns show that understanding RoN as a ‘revolutionary ecocentric movement’ is too simplistic, and it should rather be understood as a boundary object that connects place-based non-human and human well-being and relations, as well as formal and informal institutional conditions. The review revealed that themes such as justice, property rights, and personal engagement of powerful actors have been key in driving RoN cases worldwide. Likewise, contrary to the conventional perception, concern for the environment is not a common driver of RoN, and Indigenous or local communities cannot be universally and simply described as advocating actors for RoN, while undoubtedly it is often their interests that are most affected by RoN reforms. However, RoN-related rules tend to create space for questioning the purely instrumental and short-term perspectives towards nature and for redirecting the focus to relational and representational thinking. We found that disciplinary silos contributed to the historically veiled image of RoN due to insufficient engagement with interdisciplinary and decolonizing research methods. The revealed patterns can guide scholars, practitioners, and policymakers in rapidly growing cases worldwide to learn from the existing empirical knowledge. Our study is particularly valuable in times when multiple local-to-global and increasingly acute challenges around nature and biodiversity are putting pressure on societies to develop more ‘fundamental’ or ‘transformative’ approaches bridging science, policy, and practice and especially those that can better integrate diverse knowledge systems of Indigenous and local communities.https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ade5f2environmentjusticeIAD frameworksocial-ecological transformationsIndigenous and local communities |
| spellingShingle | Ilkhom Soliev Frauke Pirscher Marie Schreiber The making of rights of nature: nine patterns in a decade of empirical research on social-ecological drivers and actors Environmental Research Communications environment justice IAD framework social-ecological transformations Indigenous and local communities |
| title | The making of rights of nature: nine patterns in a decade of empirical research on social-ecological drivers and actors |
| title_full | The making of rights of nature: nine patterns in a decade of empirical research on social-ecological drivers and actors |
| title_fullStr | The making of rights of nature: nine patterns in a decade of empirical research on social-ecological drivers and actors |
| title_full_unstemmed | The making of rights of nature: nine patterns in a decade of empirical research on social-ecological drivers and actors |
| title_short | The making of rights of nature: nine patterns in a decade of empirical research on social-ecological drivers and actors |
| title_sort | making of rights of nature nine patterns in a decade of empirical research on social ecological drivers and actors |
| topic | environment justice IAD framework social-ecological transformations Indigenous and local communities |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ade5f2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ilkhomsoliev themakingofrightsofnatureninepatternsinadecadeofempiricalresearchonsocialecologicaldriversandactors AT fraukepirscher themakingofrightsofnatureninepatternsinadecadeofempiricalresearchonsocialecologicaldriversandactors AT marieschreiber themakingofrightsofnatureninepatternsinadecadeofempiricalresearchonsocialecologicaldriversandactors AT ilkhomsoliev makingofrightsofnatureninepatternsinadecadeofempiricalresearchonsocialecologicaldriversandactors AT fraukepirscher makingofrightsofnatureninepatternsinadecadeofempiricalresearchonsocialecologicaldriversandactors AT marieschreiber makingofrightsofnatureninepatternsinadecadeofempiricalresearchonsocialecologicaldriversandactors |