GHOST Commissioning Science Results. IV. Chemodynamical Analyses of Milky Way Satellites Sagittarius II and Aquarius II

We present Gemini/GHOST high-resolution spectra of five stars observed in two low surface brightness Milky Way satellites, Sagittarius II (Sgr2) and Aquarius II (Aqu2). For Aqu2, the velocities and metallicities of the two stars are consistent with membership in a dark-matter-dominated ultra-faint d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daria Zaremba, Kim Venn, Christian R. Hayes, Raphaël Errani, Triana Cornejo, Jennifer Glover, Jaclyn Jensen, Alan W. McConnachie, Julio F. Navarro, John Pazder, Federico Sestito, André Anthony, Dave Andersen, Gabriella Baker, Timothy Chin, Vladimir Churilov, Ruben Diaz, Tony Farrell, Veronica Firpo, Manuel Gomez-Jimenez, David Henderson, Venu M. Kalari, Jon Lawrence, Steve Margheim, Bryan Miller, J. Gordon Robertson, Roque Ruiz-Carmona, Katherine Silversides, Karleyne Silva, Peter J. Young, Ross Zhelem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add5f9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839635438848966656
author Daria Zaremba
Kim Venn
Christian R. Hayes
Raphaël Errani
Triana Cornejo
Jennifer Glover
Jaclyn Jensen
Alan W. McConnachie
Julio F. Navarro
John Pazder
Federico Sestito
André Anthony
Dave Andersen
Gabriella Baker
Timothy Chin
Vladimir Churilov
Ruben Diaz
Tony Farrell
Veronica Firpo
Manuel Gomez-Jimenez
David Henderson
Venu M. Kalari
Jon Lawrence
Steve Margheim
Bryan Miller
J. Gordon Robertson
Roque Ruiz-Carmona
Katherine Silversides
Karleyne Silva
Peter J. Young
Ross Zhelem
author_facet Daria Zaremba
Kim Venn
Christian R. Hayes
Raphaël Errani
Triana Cornejo
Jennifer Glover
Jaclyn Jensen
Alan W. McConnachie
Julio F. Navarro
John Pazder
Federico Sestito
André Anthony
Dave Andersen
Gabriella Baker
Timothy Chin
Vladimir Churilov
Ruben Diaz
Tony Farrell
Veronica Firpo
Manuel Gomez-Jimenez
David Henderson
Venu M. Kalari
Jon Lawrence
Steve Margheim
Bryan Miller
J. Gordon Robertson
Roque Ruiz-Carmona
Katherine Silversides
Karleyne Silva
Peter J. Young
Ross Zhelem
author_sort Daria Zaremba
collection DOAJ
description We present Gemini/GHOST high-resolution spectra of five stars observed in two low surface brightness Milky Way satellites, Sagittarius II (Sgr2) and Aquarius II (Aqu2). For Aqu2, the velocities and metallicities of the two stars are consistent with membership in a dark-matter-dominated ultra-faint dwarf galaxy (UFD). The chemical abundance ratios suggest inefficient star formation from only one or a few supernovae (e.g., low Na, Sr, Ba), and enriched potassium (K) from super-AGB stars. For Sgr2, the velocity and metallicity dispersions of its members are not clearly resolved, and our detailed chemical abundances show typical ratios for metal-poor stars, with low dispersions. There is only one exception—we report the discovery of an r -process enhanced star (Sgr 2584, [Eu/Fe] = +0.7 ± 0.2; thus, an r-I star). As r-I stars are found in both UFDs (Tuc III, Tuc IV, and Grus II) and globular clusters (M15 and M92), then this does not help to further classify the nature of Sgr2. Our exploration of Sgr2 demonstrates the difficulty in classifying some of the faintest (ambiguous) satellites. We advocate for additional diagnostics in analyzing the ambiguous systems, such as exploring radial segregation (by mass and/or chemistry), N -body simulations, and the need for dark matter to survive Galactic tidal effects. The spectra analyzed in this paper were taken as part of the GHOST commissioning observations, testing faint observation limits ( G < 18.8) and the single and double integrated field unit observing modes.
format Article
id doaj-art-ec8ea56c01cc4e81a8897fd2dcfde8c6
institution Matheson Library
issn 1538-4357
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj-art-ec8ea56c01cc4e81a8897fd2dcfde8c62025-07-09T08:31:31ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572025-01-01987221710.3847/1538-4357/add5f9GHOST Commissioning Science Results. IV. Chemodynamical Analyses of Milky Way Satellites Sagittarius II and Aquarius IIDaria Zaremba0Kim Venn1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4134-2042Christian R. Hayes2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-2445Raphaël Errani3Triana Cornejo4Jennifer Glover5Jaclyn Jensen6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4350-7632Alan W. McConnachie7https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-6564Julio F. Navarro8https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3862-5076John Pazder9Federico Sestito10https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3182-3574André Anthony11Dave Andersen12Gabriella Baker13Timothy Chin14Vladimir Churilov15Ruben Diaz16https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-5335Tony Farrell17Veronica Firpo18Manuel Gomez-Jimenez19David Henderson20Venu M. Kalari21https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4641-2532Jon Lawrence22Steve Margheim23https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8205-9441Bryan Miller24J. Gordon Robertson25Roque Ruiz-Carmona26Katherine Silversides27Karleyne Silva28https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1949-4621Peter J. Young29Ross Zhelem30Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.caDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.caNRC Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics , 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada; Space Telescope Science Institute , 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USAMcWilliams Center for Cosmology, Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USADepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.caDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.ca; Department of Physics, McGill University , 3600 Rue University, Montreal, QC, CanadaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.caDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.ca; NRC Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics , 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, CanadaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.caDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.ca; NRC Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics , 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, CanadaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.ca; Department of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, University of Hertfordshire , Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UKNRC Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics , 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, CanadaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , PO Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 3P6, Canada ; dariazaremba@uvic.ca; TMT International Observatory , 100 W. Walnut Street, Suite 300, Pasadena, CA 91124, USAAustralian Astronomical Optics, Macquarie University , 105 Delhi Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113, AustraliaAustralian Astronomical Optics, Macquarie University , 105 Delhi Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113, AustraliaAustralian Astronomical Optics, Macquarie University , 105 Delhi Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113, AustraliaGemini Observatory/NSF’s NOIRLab , Casilla 603, La Serena, ChileAustralian Astronomical Optics, Macquarie University , 105 Delhi Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113, AustraliaGemini Observatory/NSF’s NOIRLab , Av. J. Cisternas 1500 N., 1720236, La Serena, ChileGemini Observatory/NSF’s NOIRLab , Casilla 603, La Serena, ChileGemini Observatory/NSF’s NOIRLab , 670 North A’ohōkū Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USAGemini Observatory/NSF’s NOIRLab , Casilla 603, La Serena, ChileAustralian Astronomical Optics, Macquarie University , 105 Delhi Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113, AustraliaRubin Observatory/NSF’s NOIRLab , Casilla 603, La Serena, ChileGemini Observatory/NSF’s NOIRLab , Casilla 603, La Serena, ChileAustralian Astronomical Optics, Macquarie University , 105 Delhi Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia; Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney , NSW 2006, AustraliaGemini Observatory/NSF’s NOIRLab , Casilla 603, La Serena, ChileNRC Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics , 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, CanadaGemini Observatory/NSF’s NOIRLab , Casilla 603, La Serena, ChileResearch School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, College of Science, Australian National University , Canberra 2611, AustraliaAustralian Astronomical Optics, Macquarie University , 105 Delhi Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113, AustraliaWe present Gemini/GHOST high-resolution spectra of five stars observed in two low surface brightness Milky Way satellites, Sagittarius II (Sgr2) and Aquarius II (Aqu2). For Aqu2, the velocities and metallicities of the two stars are consistent with membership in a dark-matter-dominated ultra-faint dwarf galaxy (UFD). The chemical abundance ratios suggest inefficient star formation from only one or a few supernovae (e.g., low Na, Sr, Ba), and enriched potassium (K) from super-AGB stars. For Sgr2, the velocity and metallicity dispersions of its members are not clearly resolved, and our detailed chemical abundances show typical ratios for metal-poor stars, with low dispersions. There is only one exception—we report the discovery of an r -process enhanced star (Sgr 2584, [Eu/Fe] = +0.7 ± 0.2; thus, an r-I star). As r-I stars are found in both UFDs (Tuc III, Tuc IV, and Grus II) and globular clusters (M15 and M92), then this does not help to further classify the nature of Sgr2. Our exploration of Sgr2 demonstrates the difficulty in classifying some of the faintest (ambiguous) satellites. We advocate for additional diagnostics in analyzing the ambiguous systems, such as exploring radial segregation (by mass and/or chemistry), N -body simulations, and the need for dark matter to survive Galactic tidal effects. The spectra analyzed in this paper were taken as part of the GHOST commissioning observations, testing faint observation limits ( G < 18.8) and the single and double integrated field unit observing modes.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add5f9the Milky WayDwarf galaxiesStar clustersStellar abundancesAstronomical instrumentation
spellingShingle Daria Zaremba
Kim Venn
Christian R. Hayes
Raphaël Errani
Triana Cornejo
Jennifer Glover
Jaclyn Jensen
Alan W. McConnachie
Julio F. Navarro
John Pazder
Federico Sestito
André Anthony
Dave Andersen
Gabriella Baker
Timothy Chin
Vladimir Churilov
Ruben Diaz
Tony Farrell
Veronica Firpo
Manuel Gomez-Jimenez
David Henderson
Venu M. Kalari
Jon Lawrence
Steve Margheim
Bryan Miller
J. Gordon Robertson
Roque Ruiz-Carmona
Katherine Silversides
Karleyne Silva
Peter J. Young
Ross Zhelem
GHOST Commissioning Science Results. IV. Chemodynamical Analyses of Milky Way Satellites Sagittarius II and Aquarius II
The Astrophysical Journal
the Milky Way
Dwarf galaxies
Star clusters
Stellar abundances
Astronomical instrumentation
title GHOST Commissioning Science Results. IV. Chemodynamical Analyses of Milky Way Satellites Sagittarius II and Aquarius II
title_full GHOST Commissioning Science Results. IV. Chemodynamical Analyses of Milky Way Satellites Sagittarius II and Aquarius II
title_fullStr GHOST Commissioning Science Results. IV. Chemodynamical Analyses of Milky Way Satellites Sagittarius II and Aquarius II
title_full_unstemmed GHOST Commissioning Science Results. IV. Chemodynamical Analyses of Milky Way Satellites Sagittarius II and Aquarius II
title_short GHOST Commissioning Science Results. IV. Chemodynamical Analyses of Milky Way Satellites Sagittarius II and Aquarius II
title_sort ghost commissioning science results iv chemodynamical analyses of milky way satellites sagittarius ii and aquarius ii
topic the Milky Way
Dwarf galaxies
Star clusters
Stellar abundances
Astronomical instrumentation
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add5f9
work_keys_str_mv AT dariazaremba ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT kimvenn ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT christianrhayes ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT raphaelerrani ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT trianacornejo ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT jenniferglover ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT jaclynjensen ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT alanwmcconnachie ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT juliofnavarro ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT johnpazder ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT federicosestito ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT andreanthony ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT daveandersen ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT gabriellabaker ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT timothychin ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT vladimirchurilov ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT rubendiaz ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT tonyfarrell ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT veronicafirpo ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT manuelgomezjimenez ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT davidhenderson ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT venumkalari ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT jonlawrence ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT stevemargheim ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT bryanmiller ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT jgordonrobertson ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT roqueruizcarmona ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT katherinesilversides ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT karleynesilva ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT peterjyoung ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii
AT rosszhelem ghostcommissioningscienceresultsivchemodynamicalanalysesofmilkywaysatellitessagittariusiiandaquariusii