Application of standard keratometry values obtained from keratotopographic mapping data to calculate the optical power of a multifocal intraocular lens

Purpose of the study is to determine the zones of standard keratometry according to keratotopography data, which will allow for more accurate calculation of multifocal IOL using 10 formulas.Material and methods. The study included 55 patients (55 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification of cataract o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. V. Shukhaev, E. V. Boiko, Yu. M. Petrosyan, A. V. Molodkin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Real Time Ltd 2024-12-01
Series:Российский офтальмологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/1624
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839586812875505664
author S. V. Shukhaev
E. V. Boiko
Yu. M. Petrosyan
A. V. Molodkin
author_facet S. V. Shukhaev
E. V. Boiko
Yu. M. Petrosyan
A. V. Molodkin
author_sort S. V. Shukhaev
collection DOAJ
description Purpose of the study is to determine the zones of standard keratometry according to keratotopography data, which will allow for more accurate calculation of multifocal IOL using 10 formulas.Material and methods. The study included 55 patients (55 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification of cataract or refractive lensectomy with femtolaser accompaniment, implantation of multifocal IOL (Acrysof IQ PanOptix) and achieved the target refraction at different distances. Retrospective calculation of the optical power of the IOL was carried out using biometric data from OA-2000 and keratometric indicators of Pentacam (zones from 0.5 mm to 5 mm in increments of 0.5 mm on the Axial/Sagittal map centered on the apex and pupil) using 10 formulas (SRK/T, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Barrett 2 Universal, Olsen, Kane, EVO ver. 2.0, Hill RBF ver. 3.0). For each combination of zone/keratometry value/formula, the average error of postoperative predicted refraction, its difference from zero (Wilcoxon criterion), the median value taking into account the sign, the mean (MAE) and median (MedAE) absolute errors in calculating the spherical equivalent of the IOL, the standard deviation of the mean absolute error (SD) were calculated.Results. All formulas had a shift to myopic refraction, except for the Haigis formula, which shifted towards hyperopia. The absence of a significant difference from zero was shown only by the Kane formula in zones 3.5, 4.5–5.0 mm when centered on the apex and in zones 0.5, 1.5, 2.5–5.5 mm when centered on the pupil. The highest values of MAE were found in Haigis and Olsen formulas, and the minimum values were observed in most formulas in the 4.5–5.0 mm zones. The lowest MedAE values in all ranges were shown by the formulas Kane, EVO, Holladay 1 and Holladay 2. The minimum SD values were found for the formulas Kane, EVO, Holladay 1 and Holladay 2.Conclusion. The Kane formula turned out to be the most accurate in the 4.5–5.0 mm zone. This is followed by the EVO 2 and Holladay 1 formulas in the 4.0 mm zone. The Haigis formula turned out to be the least accurate. The remaining formulas can be recommended for use with SimK Pentacam data in 4.0–5.0 mm zones.
format Article
id doaj-art-ec6ecf62c071453994e2f60b4f16d39d
institution Matheson Library
issn 2072-0076
2587-5760
language Russian
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Real Time Ltd
record_format Article
series Российский офтальмологический журнал
spelling doaj-art-ec6ecf62c071453994e2f60b4f16d39d2025-08-03T19:22:37ZrusReal Time LtdРоссийский офтальмологический журнал2072-00762587-57602024-12-01174626910.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-4-62-69738Application of standard keratometry values obtained from keratotopographic mapping data to calculate the optical power of a multifocal intraocular lensS. V. Shukhaev0E. V. Boiko1Yu. M. Petrosyan2A. V. Molodkin3Saint Petersburg Branch of the S.N. Fedorov NMRC “MNTK “Eye Microsurgery”Saint Petersburg Branch of the S.N. Fedorov NMRC “MNTK “Eye Microsurgery”; Mechnikov North-West State Medical University; Saint Petersburg UniversitySaint Petersburg Branch of the S.N. Fedorov NMRC “MNTK “Eye Microsurgery”; Mechnikov North-West State Medical UniversitySaint Petersburg Branch of the S.N. Fedorov NMRC “MNTK “Eye Microsurgery”Purpose of the study is to determine the zones of standard keratometry according to keratotopography data, which will allow for more accurate calculation of multifocal IOL using 10 formulas.Material and methods. The study included 55 patients (55 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification of cataract or refractive lensectomy with femtolaser accompaniment, implantation of multifocal IOL (Acrysof IQ PanOptix) and achieved the target refraction at different distances. Retrospective calculation of the optical power of the IOL was carried out using biometric data from OA-2000 and keratometric indicators of Pentacam (zones from 0.5 mm to 5 mm in increments of 0.5 mm on the Axial/Sagittal map centered on the apex and pupil) using 10 formulas (SRK/T, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Barrett 2 Universal, Olsen, Kane, EVO ver. 2.0, Hill RBF ver. 3.0). For each combination of zone/keratometry value/formula, the average error of postoperative predicted refraction, its difference from zero (Wilcoxon criterion), the median value taking into account the sign, the mean (MAE) and median (MedAE) absolute errors in calculating the spherical equivalent of the IOL, the standard deviation of the mean absolute error (SD) were calculated.Results. All formulas had a shift to myopic refraction, except for the Haigis formula, which shifted towards hyperopia. The absence of a significant difference from zero was shown only by the Kane formula in zones 3.5, 4.5–5.0 mm when centered on the apex and in zones 0.5, 1.5, 2.5–5.5 mm when centered on the pupil. The highest values of MAE were found in Haigis and Olsen formulas, and the minimum values were observed in most formulas in the 4.5–5.0 mm zones. The lowest MedAE values in all ranges were shown by the formulas Kane, EVO, Holladay 1 and Holladay 2. The minimum SD values were found for the formulas Kane, EVO, Holladay 1 and Holladay 2.Conclusion. The Kane formula turned out to be the most accurate in the 4.5–5.0 mm zone. This is followed by the EVO 2 and Holladay 1 formulas in the 4.0 mm zone. The Haigis formula turned out to be the least accurate. The remaining formulas can be recommended for use with SimK Pentacam data in 4.0–5.0 mm zones.https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/1624keratometrykeratotopographycorneal zonemultifocal iol
spellingShingle S. V. Shukhaev
E. V. Boiko
Yu. M. Petrosyan
A. V. Molodkin
Application of standard keratometry values obtained from keratotopographic mapping data to calculate the optical power of a multifocal intraocular lens
Российский офтальмологический журнал
keratometry
keratotopography
corneal zone
multifocal iol
title Application of standard keratometry values obtained from keratotopographic mapping data to calculate the optical power of a multifocal intraocular lens
title_full Application of standard keratometry values obtained from keratotopographic mapping data to calculate the optical power of a multifocal intraocular lens
title_fullStr Application of standard keratometry values obtained from keratotopographic mapping data to calculate the optical power of a multifocal intraocular lens
title_full_unstemmed Application of standard keratometry values obtained from keratotopographic mapping data to calculate the optical power of a multifocal intraocular lens
title_short Application of standard keratometry values obtained from keratotopographic mapping data to calculate the optical power of a multifocal intraocular lens
title_sort application of standard keratometry values obtained from keratotopographic mapping data to calculate the optical power of a multifocal intraocular lens
topic keratometry
keratotopography
corneal zone
multifocal iol
url https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/1624
work_keys_str_mv AT svshukhaev applicationofstandardkeratometryvaluesobtainedfromkeratotopographicmappingdatatocalculatetheopticalpowerofamultifocalintraocularlens
AT evboiko applicationofstandardkeratometryvaluesobtainedfromkeratotopographicmappingdatatocalculatetheopticalpowerofamultifocalintraocularlens
AT yumpetrosyan applicationofstandardkeratometryvaluesobtainedfromkeratotopographicmappingdatatocalculatetheopticalpowerofamultifocalintraocularlens
AT avmolodkin applicationofstandardkeratometryvaluesobtainedfromkeratotopographicmappingdatatocalculatetheopticalpowerofamultifocalintraocularlens