Comparative Judgment: Building a Shared Consensus Over Rater Variation in Assessing Second Language Writing Performance
Rater variation has been a persistent concern for rater-mediated writing assessments. Instead of treating rater variation as an undesired source of measurement error, the method of comparative judgment (CJ) uses pairwise comparisons to elicit relative judgments from raters and statistical estimation...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Qian Wu |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-06-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251346346 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Inter- and intra-rater agreement among novices and comparison to an experienced consensus using the Gächter scale for the evaluation of septic joints
by: Tiffany I. Stockman, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Second language writing : research insights for the classroom /
Published: (1990) -
Variation in second language acquisition /
Published: (1989) -
Is generative AI ready to replace human raters in scoring EFL writing? Comparison of human and automated essay evaluation
by: Arif Cem Topuz, Mine Yıldız, Elif Taşlıbeyaz, Hamza Polat and Engin Kurşun
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Combining Written Discourse Analysis with the Teaching of Second Language Writing
by: Aboud Hennach, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)