Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan

Abstract Aim The use of minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, for gastrointestinal cancer has been rapidly increasing. This study aimed to clarify whether differences in minimally invasive surgery outcomes are associated with regional and patient characteristics. Me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atsushi Hamabe, Arata Takahashi, Hiraku Kumamaru, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Koki Otsuka, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Ken Shirabe, Masafumi Inomata, Yuko Kitagawa, Ichiro Takemasa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839645619565625344
author Atsushi Hamabe
Arata Takahashi
Hiraku Kumamaru
Hiroshi Hasegawa
Koki Otsuka
Yoshihiro Kakeji
Ken Shirabe
Masafumi Inomata
Yuko Kitagawa
Ichiro Takemasa
author_facet Atsushi Hamabe
Arata Takahashi
Hiraku Kumamaru
Hiroshi Hasegawa
Koki Otsuka
Yoshihiro Kakeji
Ken Shirabe
Masafumi Inomata
Yuko Kitagawa
Ichiro Takemasa
author_sort Atsushi Hamabe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim The use of minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, for gastrointestinal cancer has been rapidly increasing. This study aimed to clarify whether differences in minimally invasive surgery outcomes are associated with regional and patient characteristics. Methods A total of 123 771 right hemicolectomy and 126 965 low anterior resection cases performed between 2013 and 2019 were selected from the National Clinical Database for analysis. Patients were stratified by regional and economic variables, and open and minimally invasive surgical outcomes were evaluated. Results In secondary medical regions characterized by urban settings and numerous designated cancer care hospitals, the observed 30‐day mortality of low anterior resections was lower only in the minimally invasive surgery group. For right hemicolectomies in regions with many designated cancer care hospitals, the observed incidence of postoperative complications was also lower in the minimally invasive group. Residents of high‐income areas undergoing low anterior resection had a lower frequency of 30‐day reoperation regardless of the type of surgery and a lower 30‐day mortality in the minimally invasive group. For both right hemicolectomy and low anterior resection, patients with longer travel distances had fewer postoperative complications and lower 30‐day reoperation rates in the minimally invasive group than in the open surgery group. Conclusion This study found regional and patient characteristic disparities in minimally invasive surgical outcomes; national policies should be implemented to address these inequities.
format Article
id doaj-art-e7a8367af0894a08b54c1c8fd6a7c5f2
institution Matheson Library
issn 2475-0328
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
spelling doaj-art-e7a8367af0894a08b54c1c8fd6a7c5f22025-07-01T14:20:07ZengWileyAnnals of Gastroenterological Surgery2475-03282025-07-019476978410.1002/ags3.70007Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in JapanAtsushi Hamabe0Arata Takahashi1Hiraku Kumamaru2Hiroshi Hasegawa3Koki Otsuka4Yoshihiro Kakeji5Ken Shirabe6Masafumi Inomata7Yuko Kitagawa8Ichiro Takemasa9Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science Sapporo Medical University Sapporo JapanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine Keio University Tokyo JapanDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo JapanDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Kobe University Kobe JapanProject Management Subcommittee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo JapanDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Kobe University Kobe JapanDepartment of General Surgical Science Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine Maebashi Gunma JapanDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Oita University Oita JapanDepartment of Surgery Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka International Medical and Science Center, Osaka Keisatsu Hospital Osaka JapanAbstract Aim The use of minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, for gastrointestinal cancer has been rapidly increasing. This study aimed to clarify whether differences in minimally invasive surgery outcomes are associated with regional and patient characteristics. Methods A total of 123 771 right hemicolectomy and 126 965 low anterior resection cases performed between 2013 and 2019 were selected from the National Clinical Database for analysis. Patients were stratified by regional and economic variables, and open and minimally invasive surgical outcomes were evaluated. Results In secondary medical regions characterized by urban settings and numerous designated cancer care hospitals, the observed 30‐day mortality of low anterior resections was lower only in the minimally invasive surgery group. For right hemicolectomies in regions with many designated cancer care hospitals, the observed incidence of postoperative complications was also lower in the minimally invasive group. Residents of high‐income areas undergoing low anterior resection had a lower frequency of 30‐day reoperation regardless of the type of surgery and a lower 30‐day mortality in the minimally invasive group. For both right hemicolectomy and low anterior resection, patients with longer travel distances had fewer postoperative complications and lower 30‐day reoperation rates in the minimally invasive group than in the open surgery group. Conclusion This study found regional and patient characteristic disparities in minimally invasive surgical outcomes; national policies should be implemented to address these inequities.https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70007colorectal neoplasmsminimally invasive surgical proceduresNational Clinical Database
spellingShingle Atsushi Hamabe
Arata Takahashi
Hiraku Kumamaru
Hiroshi Hasegawa
Koki Otsuka
Yoshihiro Kakeji
Ken Shirabe
Masafumi Inomata
Yuko Kitagawa
Ichiro Takemasa
Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
colorectal neoplasms
minimally invasive surgical procedures
National Clinical Database
title Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan
title_full Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan
title_fullStr Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan
title_short Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan
title_sort regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in japan
topic colorectal neoplasms
minimally invasive surgical procedures
National Clinical Database
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70007
work_keys_str_mv AT atsushihamabe regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan
AT aratatakahashi regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan
AT hirakukumamaru regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan
AT hiroshihasegawa regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan
AT kokiotsuka regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan
AT yoshihirokakeji regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan
AT kenshirabe regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan
AT masafumiinomata regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan
AT yukokitagawa regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan
AT ichirotakemasa regionalandpatientcharacteristicdisparitiesintheoutcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforcolorectalcancerinjapan