Study on the Response of Cotton Leaf Color to Plant Water Content Changes and Optimal Irrigation Thresholds

Real-time monitoring of cotton moisture status and determination of appropriate irrigation thresholds are essential for achieving precision irrigation. Currently employed diagnostic methods based on physiological indicators, remote sensing, or soil moisture measurements typically present limitations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Binbin Mao, Lulu Wang, Junhui Cheng, Bing Chen, Jiandong Wang, Kai Zhang, Xiaowei Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/6/1477
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Real-time monitoring of cotton moisture status and determination of appropriate irrigation thresholds are essential for achieving precision irrigation. Currently employed diagnostic methods based on physiological indicators, remote sensing, or soil moisture measurements typically present limitations including cumbersome procedures, high labor intensity, requirements for specialized technical expertise, and delayed results. To address these challenges, this study investigated the relationship between plant water content and leaf RGB color values (red, green, and blue color values measured using LScolor technology) during the bud, flowering, and boll development stages, with the objective of establishing a predictive model for rapid, real-time moisture status monitoring. Given that leaf position and color values (R, G, and B) of different functional leaves may influence the relationship between leaf color and plant water content, and this relationship varies across different temporal periods, a two-year experiment was conducted. In 2023, leaf color data from the top five functional leaves were measured at five time points daily throughout the irrigation cycle. In 2024, the following four irrigation treatments were established: one conventional irrigation control treatment (CK) and three irrigation treatments at 72% (T1), 70% (T2), and 68% (T3) plant water content thresholds. Results demonstrated that the following: (1) plant water content initially declined during the day and subsequently showed slight recovery, indicating cotton’s particular susceptibility to water stress between 2:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m.; (2) plant water content continuously decreased across five measurement periods following irrigation during the bud, flowering, and boll development stages, with R and G color values of the five functional leaves showing declining trends between 2:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., while B color values exhibited no consistent pattern; (3) correlation analysis revealed significant positive correlations between plant water content and R and G color values of the five functional leaves during the 2:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. period, with highly significant correlations observed for the third and fourth leaves from the apex; (4) univariate and bivariate linear regression models were successfully established between cotton water content and R and G color values of the third and fourth leaves from the top; and (5) under 72% plant water content conditions, cotton achieved the highest yield and Irrigation Water Use Efficiency, indicating that 72% represents the optimal irrigation threshold. In conclusion, integrating leaf color–plant water content relationships with the 72% irrigation threshold enables rapid, non-destructive, large-scale diagnosis of cotton moisture status, providing a robust foundation for implementing effective precision irrigation strategies.
ISSN:2073-4395