After Zigzagging Between Extremes, Finally Common Sense? Will Belgium Return to Reasonable Rules on Illegally Obtained Evidence?
In the absence of statutory rules on the matter, Belgian courts traditionally applied a strict exclusionary rule for illegally gathered evidence and its fruits. The Court of Cassation in 2003 made a spectacular U-turn and prohibited exclusion of illegally obtained evidence by criminal courts, with o...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Frank Verbruggen, Charlotte Conings |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/500 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Editorial of dossier “Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Process. Between the Establishment of the Truth, Human Rights and the Efficiency of Proceedings”
by: Karolina Kremens, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Mechanisms of elimination of undesired evidence from criminal trial: a comparative approach
by: Hanna Kuczyńska
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Admissibility of Statements Obtained as a Result of “Private Torture” or “Private” Inhuman Treatment as Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Emergence of a New European Standard?
by: Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Legal safeguards against involuntary criminal confessions in Poland and Russia
by: Denis Solodov, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Digital evidence and its use for criminal proceedings
by: Jakub Matis
Published: (2025-07-01)