A Comparative Study of “Human Transcendental Identity” in the Thought of Heidegger and Mulla Sadrā
Heidegger and Mulla Sadra’s views on the “transcendental identity of human” can be examined comparatively. In this comparison, conformities and differences are obtained. The forms of affinities are as follows: First, both believe in a single meaning of transcendence in the context of existence and a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Persian |
| Published: |
Razavi University of Islamic Sciences
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | آموزههای فلسفه اسلامي |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1054_1a480ca20964ecc5e79c926ac80f308c.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839608431624847360 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohammad Hossein Kiani |
| author_facet | Mohammad Hossein Kiani |
| author_sort | Mohammad Hossein Kiani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Heidegger and Mulla Sadra’s views on the “transcendental identity of human” can be examined comparatively. In this comparison, conformities and differences are obtained. The forms of affinities are as follows: First, both believe in a single meaning of transcendence in the context of existence and acknowledge the unilateral influence of existence in the realization of human transcendence; Second, they believe in the importance of transcendence in the definition of human and consider the identity of human as dependent on transcendence and then, both imply the constant continuation of human transcendence. The points of distinction are as follows: First, their basis for transcendence is different; since the beginning of transcendence in Heidegger is with Descartes’ critique of subjectivism, and he arrives at the idea that man is the only being who realizes things in their opening; but the beginning of transcendence in Mulla Sadrā’s thought is depicted by explaining the objectivity (entity of connection) of beings to real existence and is based on the belief that the exploration of existence in man occurs through the substantial movement, will and grace of real existence. Second, Heidegger, with the ontological system he portrayed, believes in Dasein’s self-reliance in transcendence; but in Mulla Sadra’s thought, attention to the divinity and in the light of it, scientific and practical reliance on its aspects has fundamental importance. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e2d4f1ddbd064b51aac561337b14be36 |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 2251-9386 2783-4026 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | Razavi University of Islamic Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | آموزههای فلسفه اسلامي |
| spelling | doaj-art-e2d4f1ddbd064b51aac561337b14be362025-07-31T10:29:57ZfasRazavi University of Islamic Sciencesآموزههای فلسفه اسلامي2251-93862783-40262020-07-0115262132291054A Comparative Study of “Human Transcendental Identity” in the Thought of Heidegger and Mulla SadrāMohammad Hossein Kiani0PhD in Comparative Philosophy, Qom UniversityHeidegger and Mulla Sadra’s views on the “transcendental identity of human” can be examined comparatively. In this comparison, conformities and differences are obtained. The forms of affinities are as follows: First, both believe in a single meaning of transcendence in the context of existence and acknowledge the unilateral influence of existence in the realization of human transcendence; Second, they believe in the importance of transcendence in the definition of human and consider the identity of human as dependent on transcendence and then, both imply the constant continuation of human transcendence. The points of distinction are as follows: First, their basis for transcendence is different; since the beginning of transcendence in Heidegger is with Descartes’ critique of subjectivism, and he arrives at the idea that man is the only being who realizes things in their opening; but the beginning of transcendence in Mulla Sadrā’s thought is depicted by explaining the objectivity (entity of connection) of beings to real existence and is based on the belief that the exploration of existence in man occurs through the substantial movement, will and grace of real existence. Second, Heidegger, with the ontological system he portrayed, believes in Dasein’s self-reliance in transcendence; but in Mulla Sadra’s thought, attention to the divinity and in the light of it, scientific and practical reliance on its aspects has fundamental importance.https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1054_1a480ca20964ecc5e79c926ac80f308c.pdfsubjectivismrank of existents (chain of being)existencedaseinentity of connection |
| spellingShingle | Mohammad Hossein Kiani A Comparative Study of “Human Transcendental Identity” in the Thought of Heidegger and Mulla Sadrā آموزههای فلسفه اسلامي subjectivism rank of existents (chain of being) existence dasein entity of connection |
| title | A Comparative Study of “Human Transcendental Identity” in the Thought of Heidegger and Mulla Sadrā |
| title_full | A Comparative Study of “Human Transcendental Identity” in the Thought of Heidegger and Mulla Sadrā |
| title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of “Human Transcendental Identity” in the Thought of Heidegger and Mulla Sadrā |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of “Human Transcendental Identity” in the Thought of Heidegger and Mulla Sadrā |
| title_short | A Comparative Study of “Human Transcendental Identity” in the Thought of Heidegger and Mulla Sadrā |
| title_sort | comparative study of human transcendental identity in the thought of heidegger and mulla sadra |
| topic | subjectivism rank of existents (chain of being) existence dasein entity of connection |
| url | https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1054_1a480ca20964ecc5e79c926ac80f308c.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadhosseinkiani acomparativestudyofhumantranscendentalidentityinthethoughtofheideggerandmullasadra AT mohammadhosseinkiani comparativestudyofhumantranscendentalidentityinthethoughtofheideggerandmullasadra |