A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism

Few issues remain as fraught as the relationship between European integration and national welfare states. For too long, Social Europe was an afterthought, relegated to the soft domain of the open method of coordination, while the formation of the single market proceeded with the full force of Europ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven Klein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-03-01
Series:European Law Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613524000365/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839636375537713152
author Steven Klein
author_facet Steven Klein
author_sort Steven Klein
collection DOAJ
description Few issues remain as fraught as the relationship between European integration and national welfare states. For too long, Social Europe was an afterthought, relegated to the soft domain of the open method of coordination, while the formation of the single market proceeded with the full force of European law and institutions. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the social has returned—not just in Europe, but in all regions grappling with what comes after neo-liberalism. In this response, I turn to Christian Joerges’s seminal articulation of the conflict of laws as Europe’s constitutional form as a contribution to this current theoretical task. Central here has been how Joerges has staged a dialogue between theories of European law and the critique of the market order developed by the Hungarian philosopher and social theorist Karl Polanyi. I argue that Joerges picks up on democratic undercurrents in Polanyi’s theory that move beyond the opposition between nationally bounded welfare states and transnational private economic rights. Rather, we can see the social as a domain of multi-level democratic conflict mediation. While Joerges respects the ordoliberal vision of an economic constitution, he draws attention to their democratic deficits. Indeed, both the ordoliberals and Polanyi would reject the EU’s technocratic instrumentalisation of the market as a device for restructuring national social systems in a way that both deformalises European law and undermines its democratic legitimacy. I conclude with some speculative remarks about how the EU could be seen as introducing new dimensions of conflict into an emerging post-neoliberal order.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2a15050f77e46d68ffdd01dcde71eb1
institution Matheson Library
issn 2752-6135
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series European Law Open
spelling doaj-art-e2a15050f77e46d68ffdd01dcde71eb12025-07-08T01:55:25ZengCambridge University PressEuropean Law Open2752-61352025-03-014768810.1017/elo.2024.36A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalismSteven Klein0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7224-9161Department of Political Economy, King’s College London, Strand Campus, Bush House, London, UKFew issues remain as fraught as the relationship between European integration and national welfare states. For too long, Social Europe was an afterthought, relegated to the soft domain of the open method of coordination, while the formation of the single market proceeded with the full force of European law and institutions. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the social has returned—not just in Europe, but in all regions grappling with what comes after neo-liberalism. In this response, I turn to Christian Joerges’s seminal articulation of the conflict of laws as Europe’s constitutional form as a contribution to this current theoretical task. Central here has been how Joerges has staged a dialogue between theories of European law and the critique of the market order developed by the Hungarian philosopher and social theorist Karl Polanyi. I argue that Joerges picks up on democratic undercurrents in Polanyi’s theory that move beyond the opposition between nationally bounded welfare states and transnational private economic rights. Rather, we can see the social as a domain of multi-level democratic conflict mediation. While Joerges respects the ordoliberal vision of an economic constitution, he draws attention to their democratic deficits. Indeed, both the ordoliberals and Polanyi would reject the EU’s technocratic instrumentalisation of the market as a device for restructuring national social systems in a way that both deformalises European law and undermines its democratic legitimacy. I conclude with some speculative remarks about how the EU could be seen as introducing new dimensions of conflict into an emerging post-neoliberal order.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613524000365/type/journal_articleChristian JoergesKarl PolanyiEuropean lawconflicts of lawdouble movement
spellingShingle Steven Klein
A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism
European Law Open
Christian Joerges
Karl Polanyi
European law
conflicts of law
double movement
title A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism
title_full A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism
title_fullStr A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism
title_full_unstemmed A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism
title_short A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism
title_sort transnational double movement polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism
topic Christian Joerges
Karl Polanyi
European law
conflicts of law
double movement
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613524000365/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenklein atransnationaldoublemovementpolanyianreflectionsonconflictslawconstitutionalism
AT stevenklein transnationaldoublemovementpolanyianreflectionsonconflictslawconstitutionalism