A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism
Few issues remain as fraught as the relationship between European integration and national welfare states. For too long, Social Europe was an afterthought, relegated to the soft domain of the open method of coordination, while the formation of the single market proceeded with the full force of Europ...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-03-01
|
Series: | European Law Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613524000365/type/journal_article |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1839636375537713152 |
---|---|
author | Steven Klein |
author_facet | Steven Klein |
author_sort | Steven Klein |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Few issues remain as fraught as the relationship between European integration and national welfare states. For too long, Social Europe was an afterthought, relegated to the soft domain of the open method of coordination, while the formation of the single market proceeded with the full force of European law and institutions. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the social has returned—not just in Europe, but in all regions grappling with what comes after neo-liberalism. In this response, I turn to Christian Joerges’s seminal articulation of the conflict of laws as Europe’s constitutional form as a contribution to this current theoretical task. Central here has been how Joerges has staged a dialogue between theories of European law and the critique of the market order developed by the Hungarian philosopher and social theorist Karl Polanyi. I argue that Joerges picks up on democratic undercurrents in Polanyi’s theory that move beyond the opposition between nationally bounded welfare states and transnational private economic rights. Rather, we can see the social as a domain of multi-level democratic conflict mediation. While Joerges respects the ordoliberal vision of an economic constitution, he draws attention to their democratic deficits. Indeed, both the ordoliberals and Polanyi would reject the EU’s technocratic instrumentalisation of the market as a device for restructuring national social systems in a way that both deformalises European law and undermines its democratic legitimacy. I conclude with some speculative remarks about how the EU could be seen as introducing new dimensions of conflict into an emerging post-neoliberal order. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-e2a15050f77e46d68ffdd01dcde71eb1 |
institution | Matheson Library |
issn | 2752-6135 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | European Law Open |
spelling | doaj-art-e2a15050f77e46d68ffdd01dcde71eb12025-07-08T01:55:25ZengCambridge University PressEuropean Law Open2752-61352025-03-014768810.1017/elo.2024.36A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalismSteven Klein0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7224-9161Department of Political Economy, King’s College London, Strand Campus, Bush House, London, UKFew issues remain as fraught as the relationship between European integration and national welfare states. For too long, Social Europe was an afterthought, relegated to the soft domain of the open method of coordination, while the formation of the single market proceeded with the full force of European law and institutions. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the social has returned—not just in Europe, but in all regions grappling with what comes after neo-liberalism. In this response, I turn to Christian Joerges’s seminal articulation of the conflict of laws as Europe’s constitutional form as a contribution to this current theoretical task. Central here has been how Joerges has staged a dialogue between theories of European law and the critique of the market order developed by the Hungarian philosopher and social theorist Karl Polanyi. I argue that Joerges picks up on democratic undercurrents in Polanyi’s theory that move beyond the opposition between nationally bounded welfare states and transnational private economic rights. Rather, we can see the social as a domain of multi-level democratic conflict mediation. While Joerges respects the ordoliberal vision of an economic constitution, he draws attention to their democratic deficits. Indeed, both the ordoliberals and Polanyi would reject the EU’s technocratic instrumentalisation of the market as a device for restructuring national social systems in a way that both deformalises European law and undermines its democratic legitimacy. I conclude with some speculative remarks about how the EU could be seen as introducing new dimensions of conflict into an emerging post-neoliberal order.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613524000365/type/journal_articleChristian JoergesKarl PolanyiEuropean lawconflicts of lawdouble movement |
spellingShingle | Steven Klein A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism European Law Open Christian Joerges Karl Polanyi European law conflicts of law double movement |
title | A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism |
title_full | A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism |
title_fullStr | A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism |
title_full_unstemmed | A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism |
title_short | A transnational double movement? Polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism |
title_sort | transnational double movement polanyian reflections on conflicts law constitutionalism |
topic | Christian Joerges Karl Polanyi European law conflicts of law double movement |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613524000365/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stevenklein atransnationaldoublemovementpolanyianreflectionsonconflictslawconstitutionalism AT stevenklein transnationaldoublemovementpolanyianreflectionsonconflictslawconstitutionalism |