Lamb behaviour during and shortly after tail-docking
Routine husbandry procedures for lambs are increasingly scrutinised for their animal welfare implications. One such procedure is tail-docking, which is commonly performed to prevent breech blowfly strike. Although tail-docking is considered painful for lambs, the precise level of pain remains unqua...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
South African Society for Animal Science
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | South African Journal of Animal Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.sajas.co.za/article/view/23253 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Routine husbandry procedures for lambs are increasingly scrutinised for their animal welfare implications. One such procedure is tail-docking, which is commonly performed to prevent breech blowfly strike. Although tail-docking is considered painful for lambs, the precise level of pain remains unquantified. While proponents argue that the long-term benefits outweigh the temporary pain caused; further investigations into the welfare implications of tail-docking are needed. This study assessed Merino lambs at an average docking age of 14 ± 3 days across five cohorts, each comprising 25–35 ewes and their lambs (n = 228). Two treatments were administered: the Control group lambs were left intact and undocked, while the Treatment group lambs were tail-docked. Lambs were randomly assigned to either group, with birth type and sex as stratifying factors. Observational data were collected during three periods: 1. during the tail-docking/sham procedure following the established protocol; 2. during a two-minute period immediately post-docking, upon returning to their dams; and 3. during a two-minute period 10 minutes post-docking. Signs of discomfort were evident during tail-docking and persisted at two and 10 minutes post-procedure. During the docking/sham procedure, undocked lambs were more likely to remain calm, whereas docked lambs exhibited signs of distress, including restlessness, kicking, bleating, and tense facial expressions. Observations at two minutes post-docking aligned with those recorded at 10 minutes post-docking, indicating sustained discomfort. These findings suggest that tail-docking results in both immediate and longer-term discomfort. Further research should assess whether the long-term benefits of tail-docking justify the associated pain.
Submitted 11 June 2024; Accepted 30 January 2025; Published March 2025
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Significance of research to South African science
The article makes a valuable contribution to animal welfare science in South Africa by providing empirical evidence on the behavioural responses of lambs subjected to tail-docking. Conducted at the Elsenburg experimental farm, the study uses a controlled design to assess short-term pain and discomfort associated with this common husbandry procedure. Its findings - highlighting signs of restlessness, agitation, and facial tension in docked lambs - offer scientific insight into the ethical implications of tail-docking, particularly for Merino breeds vulnerable to breech strike. This research supports ongoing discussions on welfare-friendly livestock management and aligns with global trends favouring ethical certification and traceability in animal product supply chains, directly informing South Africa’s sheep farming industry and policy development.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0375-1589 2221-4062 |