BULGARIAN LITERATURE AND CHRISTIANITY: THE BIG QUESTION OF A “SMALL” NATION
The paper raises the question of the relationship between the Christian religion and Bulgarian literature as it is regarded as one of the “big questions” in modern Bulgarian culture. This article takes / assumes as its starting point an established belief, one that has been repeatedly discredited,...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Bulgarian |
| Published: |
South-West University "Neofit Rilski" Publishing House
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Езиков свят |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ezikovsvyat.swu.bg/images/stories/issue_23_2_2025/15.%20Drzewiecka_159-172.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The paper raises the question of the relationship between the Christian religion and Bulgarian literature
as it is regarded as one of the “big questions” in modern Bulgarian culture. This article takes / assumes as its starting point an
established belief, one that has been repeatedly discredited, that Bulgarian literature is “quite poor in terms of philosophical
and moral-religious motives” (Boyan Penev). The notion of “small nation,” which is a reference to a famous concept by
Miroslav Hroch, serves as a call to reconsider traditionally accepted classifications and taxonomies in specific perspectives
related to the cultural history of Bulgarian humanities, as well as the history of ideas. The cultural phenomenon “Christianity
in / of Bulgarian literature” is addressed within the context of the modern “grand narrative” which encompasses matters of
religion in relation to modernity. The analysis draws on and references the famous thesis by Talas Asad on the so-called
“Protestant bias” within the modern humanities and social sciences. The prejudice of (non-)religious Bulgarians (respectively
Bulgarian literature) is commented within the epistemological horizon given by the postsecular thought which claims that the
“religious-secular” opposition is discursive and contextual, and the academic discourse is entangled with various
cryptotheologies. The analysis aims to show that deconstructing notions and meanings that have been imposed in research of
European “periphery” (“a small nation”) may shatter the established “truths” about modernity and its relationship to religion
and “secular” idea(l)s. It is suggested that nowadays, Bulgarian studies have great potential because they can contribute to
current critical attempts to penetrate, undermine and dismantle from within the dominant systems of understanding and
classifying “(non-)religious” phenomena. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1312-0484 2603-4026 |