Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models

National-scale forest inventories such as the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program in the United States are designed to provide data and estimates that meet target precision at the national and state levels. However, such design-based direct estimates are often not accurate at a smaller geogr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Okikiola M. Alegbeleye, Krishna P. Poudel, Curtis VanderSchaaf, Yun Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/14/2407
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839615269197053952
author Okikiola M. Alegbeleye
Krishna P. Poudel
Curtis VanderSchaaf
Yun Yang
author_facet Okikiola M. Alegbeleye
Krishna P. Poudel
Curtis VanderSchaaf
Yun Yang
author_sort Okikiola M. Alegbeleye
collection DOAJ
description National-scale forest inventories such as the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program in the United States are designed to provide data and estimates that meet target precision at the national and state levels. However, such design-based direct estimates are often not accurate at a smaller geographic scale due to the small sample size. Small area estimation (SAE) techniques provide precise estimates at small domains by borrowing strength from remotely sensed auxiliary information. This study combined the FIA direct estimates with gridded mean canopy heights derived from recently published Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Level 3 data and Landsat data to improve county-level estimates of total and merchantable volume, aboveground biomass, and basal area in the states of Alabama and Mississippi, USA. Compared with the FIA direct estimates, the area-level SAE models reduced root mean square error for all variables of interest. The multi-state SAE models had a mean relative standard error of 0.67. In contrast, single-state models had relative standard errors of 0.54 and 0.59 for Alabama and Mississippi, respectively. Despite GEDI’s limited footprints, this study reveals its potential to reduce direct estimate errors at the sub-state level when combined with Landsat bands through the small area estimation technique.
format Article
id doaj-art-dd2d85e3c70e49cba5d35ddef070f84a
institution Matheson Library
issn 2072-4292
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj-art-dd2d85e3c70e49cba5d35ddef070f84a2025-07-25T13:35:14ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922025-07-011714240710.3390/rs17142407Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot ModelsOkikiola M. Alegbeleye0Krishna P. Poudel1Curtis VanderSchaaf2Yun Yang3School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USADepartment of Forestry, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USADepartment of Forestry, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USACollege of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USANational-scale forest inventories such as the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program in the United States are designed to provide data and estimates that meet target precision at the national and state levels. However, such design-based direct estimates are often not accurate at a smaller geographic scale due to the small sample size. Small area estimation (SAE) techniques provide precise estimates at small domains by borrowing strength from remotely sensed auxiliary information. This study combined the FIA direct estimates with gridded mean canopy heights derived from recently published Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Level 3 data and Landsat data to improve county-level estimates of total and merchantable volume, aboveground biomass, and basal area in the states of Alabama and Mississippi, USA. Compared with the FIA direct estimates, the area-level SAE models reduced root mean square error for all variables of interest. The multi-state SAE models had a mean relative standard error of 0.67. In contrast, single-state models had relative standard errors of 0.54 and 0.59 for Alabama and Mississippi, respectively. Despite GEDI’s limited footprints, this study reveals its potential to reduce direct estimate errors at the sub-state level when combined with Landsat bands through the small area estimation technique.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/14/2407small area estimationFIAGEDIlandsatarea-level composite estimator
spellingShingle Okikiola M. Alegbeleye
Krishna P. Poudel
Curtis VanderSchaaf
Yun Yang
Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models
Remote Sensing
small area estimation
FIA
GEDI
landsat
area-level composite estimator
title Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models
title_full Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models
title_fullStr Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models
title_full_unstemmed Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models
title_short Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models
title_sort improving the estimates of county level forest attributes using gedi and landsat derived auxiliary information in fay herriot models
topic small area estimation
FIA
GEDI
landsat
area-level composite estimator
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/14/2407
work_keys_str_mv AT okikiolamalegbeleye improvingtheestimatesofcountylevelforestattributesusinggediandlandsatderivedauxiliaryinformationinfayherriotmodels
AT krishnappoudel improvingtheestimatesofcountylevelforestattributesusinggediandlandsatderivedauxiliaryinformationinfayherriotmodels
AT curtisvanderschaaf improvingtheestimatesofcountylevelforestattributesusinggediandlandsatderivedauxiliaryinformationinfayherriotmodels
AT yunyang improvingtheestimatesofcountylevelforestattributesusinggediandlandsatderivedauxiliaryinformationinfayherriotmodels