Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation
In the article, based on the comparison of different approaches to the fault of a legal entity in an administrative offense, the possibility and necessity of establishing an intentional or reckless form of guilt of a legal entity in committing an administrative offense in the field of antimonopoly l...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Omsk Law Academy
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Сибирское юридическое обозрение |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/525 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839629127212072960 |
|---|---|
| author | Sergei S. Sumenkov |
| author_facet | Sergei S. Sumenkov |
| author_sort | Sergei S. Sumenkov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the article, based on the comparison of different approaches to the fault of a legal entity in an administrative offense, the possibility and necessity of establishing an intentional or reckless form of guilt of a legal entity in committing an administrative offense in the field of antimonopoly legislation through the forms of fault of the respective officials are substantiated. Specific features of the “intellectual” element of guilt are applied in relation to the corresponding composition of administrative offenses. Attention is drawn to the role of antimonopoly compliance in establishing the guilt of organizations in administrative offenses in the field of antimonopoly legislation. It is proposed to introduce into the administrative law institutes of complicity, double forms of guilt and kurtosis of the executor in order to ensure proper involvement of both organizations and their officials in administrative responsibility. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-dc6ac87d367f45f5b619011b6d88bf25 |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 2658-7602 2658-7610 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | Omsk Law Academy |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Сибирское юридическое обозрение |
| spelling | doaj-art-dc6ac87d367f45f5b619011b6d88bf252025-07-15T08:04:13ZrusOmsk Law AcademyСибирское юридическое обозрение2658-76022658-76102017-12-0114450050410.19073/2306-1340-2017-14-4-132-136499Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly LegislationSergei S. Sumenkov0Omsk airport FyodorovkaIn the article, based on the comparison of different approaches to the fault of a legal entity in an administrative offense, the possibility and necessity of establishing an intentional or reckless form of guilt of a legal entity in committing an administrative offense in the field of antimonopoly legislation through the forms of fault of the respective officials are substantiated. Specific features of the “intellectual” element of guilt are applied in relation to the corresponding composition of administrative offenses. Attention is drawn to the role of antimonopoly compliance in establishing the guilt of organizations in administrative offenses in the field of antimonopoly legislation. It is proposed to introduce into the administrative law institutes of complicity, double forms of guilt and kurtosis of the executor in order to ensure proper involvement of both organizations and their officials in administrative responsibility.https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/525административное правонарушениеантимонопольное законодательствовина юридического лицадвойная форма виныadministrative offenseantimonopoly legislationlegal entity guiltdouble form of guilt |
| spellingShingle | Sergei S. Sumenkov Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation Сибирское юридическое обозрение административное правонарушение антимонопольное законодательство вина юридического лица двойная форма вины administrative offense antimonopoly legislation legal entity guilt double form of guilt |
| title | Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation |
| title_full | Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation |
| title_fullStr | Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation |
| title_short | Guilt of a Legal Entity in an Administrative Offense in the Field of Antimonopoly Legislation |
| title_sort | guilt of a legal entity in an administrative offense in the field of antimonopoly legislation |
| topic | административное правонарушение антимонопольное законодательство вина юридического лица двойная форма вины administrative offense antimonopoly legislation legal entity guilt double form of guilt |
| url | https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/525 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sergeissumenkov guiltofalegalentityinanadministrativeoffenseinthefieldofantimonopolylegislation |