Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials.
<h4>Background</h4>Most publications about selective reporting in clinical trials have focussed on outcomes. However, selective reporting of analyses for a given outcome may also affect the validity of findings. If analyses are selected on the basis of the results, reporting bias may occ...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Kerry Dwan, Douglas G Altman, Mike Clarke, Carrol Gamble, Julian P T Higgins, Jonathan A C Sterne, Paula R Williamson, Jamie J Kirkham |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-06-01
|
Series: | PLoS Medicine |
Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001666&type=printable |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.
by: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
The role of systematic reviews in pharmacovigilance planning and Clinical Trials Authorisation application: example from the SLEEPS trial.
by: Carrol Gamble, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
The Use and Reporting of the Cross-Over Study Design in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Assessment.
by: Sarah Jane Nolan, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies.
by: Matthew J Page, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CHRONIC DISEASE TREATMENT: A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE TRADITIONAL PHARMACOECONOMIC AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSES
by: O. V. Zhukova, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01)