Physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depths

ObjectivesThis study analyzed the physical-chemical behavior of 2 bulk fill resin composites (BFCs; Filtek Bulk Fill [FBF], and Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk Fill [TBF]) used in 2- and 4-mm increments and compared them with a conventional resin composite (Filtek Z250).Materials and MethodsFlexural strength an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guillermo Grazioli, Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez, Leina Nakanishi, Alejandro Francia, Rafael Ratto de Moraes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2021-08-01
Series:Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rde.ac/upload/pdf/rde-46-e39.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839641795484450816
author Guillermo Grazioli
Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez
Leina Nakanishi
Alejandro Francia
Rafael Ratto de Moraes
author_facet Guillermo Grazioli
Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez
Leina Nakanishi
Alejandro Francia
Rafael Ratto de Moraes
author_sort Guillermo Grazioli
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivesThis study analyzed the physical-chemical behavior of 2 bulk fill resin composites (BFCs; Filtek Bulk Fill [FBF], and Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk Fill [TBF]) used in 2- and 4-mm increments and compared them with a conventional resin composite (Filtek Z250).Materials and MethodsFlexural strength and elastic modulus were evaluated by using a 3-point bending test. Knoop hardness was measured at depth areas 0–1, 1–2, 2–3, and 3–4 mm. The translucency parameter was measured using an optical spectrophotometer. Real-time polymerization kinetics was analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.ResultsFlexural strength was similar among the materials, while TBF showed lower elastic modulus (Z250: 6.6 ± 1.3, FBF: 6.4 ± 0.9, TBF: 4.3 ± 1.3). The hardness of Z250 was similar only between 0–1 mm and 1–2 mm. Both BFCs had similar hardness until 2–3 mm, and showed significant decreases at 3–4 mm (FBF: 33.45 ± 1.95 at 0–1 mm to 23.19 ± 4.32 at 3–4 mm, TBF: 23.17 ± 2.51 at 0–1 mm to 15.11 ± 1.94 at 3–4 mm). The BFCs showed higher translucency than Z250. The polymerization kinetics of all the materials were similar at 2-mm increments. At 4-mm, only TBF had a similar degree of conversion compared with 2 mm.ConclusionsThe BFCs tested had similar performance compared to the conventional composite when used in up to 2-mm increments. When the increment was thicker, the BFCs were properly polymerized only up to 3 mm.
format Article
id doaj-art-dbc7e39e6a8540b59a8911f4fbf43860
institution Matheson Library
issn 2234-7658
2234-7666
language English
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
record_format Article
series Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
spelling doaj-art-dbc7e39e6a8540b59a8911f4fbf438602025-07-03T04:25:05ZengKorean Academy of Conservative DentistryRestorative Dentistry & Endodontics2234-76582234-76662021-08-01463e3910.5395/rde.2021.46.e39977Physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depthsGuillermo Grazioli0Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez1Leina Nakanishi2Alejandro Francia3Rafael Ratto de Moraes4Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, UruguayLaboratory of Dental Materials, Academic Area of Dentistry, Autonomous University of Hidalgo State, Pachuca, MéxicoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, BrazilDepartment of General and Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, UruguayGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, BrazilObjectivesThis study analyzed the physical-chemical behavior of 2 bulk fill resin composites (BFCs; Filtek Bulk Fill [FBF], and Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk Fill [TBF]) used in 2- and 4-mm increments and compared them with a conventional resin composite (Filtek Z250).Materials and MethodsFlexural strength and elastic modulus were evaluated by using a 3-point bending test. Knoop hardness was measured at depth areas 0–1, 1–2, 2–3, and 3–4 mm. The translucency parameter was measured using an optical spectrophotometer. Real-time polymerization kinetics was analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.ResultsFlexural strength was similar among the materials, while TBF showed lower elastic modulus (Z250: 6.6 ± 1.3, FBF: 6.4 ± 0.9, TBF: 4.3 ± 1.3). The hardness of Z250 was similar only between 0–1 mm and 1–2 mm. Both BFCs had similar hardness until 2–3 mm, and showed significant decreases at 3–4 mm (FBF: 33.45 ± 1.95 at 0–1 mm to 23.19 ± 4.32 at 3–4 mm, TBF: 23.17 ± 2.51 at 0–1 mm to 15.11 ± 1.94 at 3–4 mm). The BFCs showed higher translucency than Z250. The polymerization kinetics of all the materials were similar at 2-mm increments. At 4-mm, only TBF had a similar degree of conversion compared with 2 mm.ConclusionsThe BFCs tested had similar performance compared to the conventional composite when used in up to 2-mm increments. When the increment was thicker, the BFCs were properly polymerized only up to 3 mm.http://rde.ac/upload/pdf/rde-46-e39.pdfresin compositeflexural strengthhardnesspolymerization
spellingShingle Guillermo Grazioli
Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez
Leina Nakanishi
Alejandro Francia
Rafael Ratto de Moraes
Physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depths
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
resin composite
flexural strength
hardness
polymerization
title Physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depths
title_full Physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depths
title_fullStr Physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depths
title_full_unstemmed Physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depths
title_short Physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depths
title_sort physicochemical characterization of two bulk fill composites at different depths
topic resin composite
flexural strength
hardness
polymerization
url http://rde.ac/upload/pdf/rde-46-e39.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT guillermograzioli physicochemicalcharacterizationoftwobulkfillcompositesatdifferentdepths
AT carlosenriquecuevassuarez physicochemicalcharacterizationoftwobulkfillcompositesatdifferentdepths
AT leinanakanishi physicochemicalcharacterizationoftwobulkfillcompositesatdifferentdepths
AT alejandrofrancia physicochemicalcharacterizationoftwobulkfillcompositesatdifferentdepths
AT rafaelrattodemoraes physicochemicalcharacterizationoftwobulkfillcompositesatdifferentdepths