Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density
Abstract Spatial aggregation of environmental or trophically transmitted parasites has the potential to influence host–parasite interactions. The distribution of parasites on hosts is one result of those interactions, and the role of spatial aggregation is unclear. We use a spatially explicit agent‐...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2025-06-01
|
Series: | Ecosphere |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70324 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1839650224324214784 |
---|---|
author | Chris Wojan Allison K. Shaw Meggan E. Craft |
author_facet | Chris Wojan Allison K. Shaw Meggan E. Craft |
author_sort | Chris Wojan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Spatial aggregation of environmental or trophically transmitted parasites has the potential to influence host–parasite interactions. The distribution of parasites on hosts is one result of those interactions, and the role of spatial aggregation is unclear. We use a spatially explicit agent‐based model to determine how spatial aggregation of parasites influences the distribution of parasite burdens across a range of parasite densities and host recovery rates. Our model simulates the random movement of hosts across landscapes with varying spatial configurations of areas occupied by environmental parasites, allowing hosts to acquire parasites they encounter and subsequently lose them. When parasites are more spatially aggregated in the environment, the aggregation of parasite burdens on hosts is higher (i.e., more hosts with few parasites, fewer hosts with many parasites), but the effect is less pronounced at high parasite density and fast host recovery rates. In addition, the correlation between individual hosts' final parasite burdens and their cumulative parasite burdens (including lost parasites) is greater at higher levels of spatial parasite aggregation. Our work suggests that fine‐scale spatial patterns of parasites can play a strong role in shaping how hosts are parasitized, particularly when parasite density is low‐to‐moderate and recovery rates are slow. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-db5c16a0372c4b519076df01cf29d97a |
institution | Matheson Library |
issn | 2150-8925 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Ecosphere |
spelling | doaj-art-db5c16a0372c4b519076df01cf29d97a2025-06-27T06:10:49ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252025-06-01166n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70324Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite densityChris Wojan0Allison K. Shaw1Meggan E. Craft2Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USADepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USADepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USAAbstract Spatial aggregation of environmental or trophically transmitted parasites has the potential to influence host–parasite interactions. The distribution of parasites on hosts is one result of those interactions, and the role of spatial aggregation is unclear. We use a spatially explicit agent‐based model to determine how spatial aggregation of parasites influences the distribution of parasite burdens across a range of parasite densities and host recovery rates. Our model simulates the random movement of hosts across landscapes with varying spatial configurations of areas occupied by environmental parasites, allowing hosts to acquire parasites they encounter and subsequently lose them. When parasites are more spatially aggregated in the environment, the aggregation of parasite burdens on hosts is higher (i.e., more hosts with few parasites, fewer hosts with many parasites), but the effect is less pronounced at high parasite density and fast host recovery rates. In addition, the correlation between individual hosts' final parasite burdens and their cumulative parasite burdens (including lost parasites) is greater at higher levels of spatial parasite aggregation. Our work suggests that fine‐scale spatial patterns of parasites can play a strong role in shaping how hosts are parasitized, particularly when parasite density is low‐to‐moderate and recovery rates are slow.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70324agent‐based modelparasite aggregationparasite ecologyspatial distribution |
spellingShingle | Chris Wojan Allison K. Shaw Meggan E. Craft Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density Ecosphere agent‐based model parasite aggregation parasite ecology spatial distribution |
title | Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density |
title_full | Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density |
title_fullStr | Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density |
title_full_unstemmed | Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density |
title_short | Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density |
title_sort | parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations but not at high parasite density |
topic | agent‐based model parasite aggregation parasite ecology spatial distribution |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chriswojan parasitespatialdistributionshapesparasiteaggregationonhostpopulationsbutnotathighparasitedensity AT allisonkshaw parasitespatialdistributionshapesparasiteaggregationonhostpopulationsbutnotathighparasitedensity AT megganecraft parasitespatialdistributionshapesparasiteaggregationonhostpopulationsbutnotathighparasitedensity |