Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density

Abstract Spatial aggregation of environmental or trophically transmitted parasites has the potential to influence host–parasite interactions. The distribution of parasites on hosts is one result of those interactions, and the role of spatial aggregation is unclear. We use a spatially explicit agent‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Wojan, Allison K. Shaw, Meggan E. Craft
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70324
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839650224324214784
author Chris Wojan
Allison K. Shaw
Meggan E. Craft
author_facet Chris Wojan
Allison K. Shaw
Meggan E. Craft
author_sort Chris Wojan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Spatial aggregation of environmental or trophically transmitted parasites has the potential to influence host–parasite interactions. The distribution of parasites on hosts is one result of those interactions, and the role of spatial aggregation is unclear. We use a spatially explicit agent‐based model to determine how spatial aggregation of parasites influences the distribution of parasite burdens across a range of parasite densities and host recovery rates. Our model simulates the random movement of hosts across landscapes with varying spatial configurations of areas occupied by environmental parasites, allowing hosts to acquire parasites they encounter and subsequently lose them. When parasites are more spatially aggregated in the environment, the aggregation of parasite burdens on hosts is higher (i.e., more hosts with few parasites, fewer hosts with many parasites), but the effect is less pronounced at high parasite density and fast host recovery rates. In addition, the correlation between individual hosts' final parasite burdens and their cumulative parasite burdens (including lost parasites) is greater at higher levels of spatial parasite aggregation. Our work suggests that fine‐scale spatial patterns of parasites can play a strong role in shaping how hosts are parasitized, particularly when parasite density is low‐to‐moderate and recovery rates are slow.
format Article
id doaj-art-db5c16a0372c4b519076df01cf29d97a
institution Matheson Library
issn 2150-8925
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj-art-db5c16a0372c4b519076df01cf29d97a2025-06-27T06:10:49ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252025-06-01166n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70324Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite densityChris Wojan0Allison K. Shaw1Meggan E. Craft2Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USADepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USADepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USAAbstract Spatial aggregation of environmental or trophically transmitted parasites has the potential to influence host–parasite interactions. The distribution of parasites on hosts is one result of those interactions, and the role of spatial aggregation is unclear. We use a spatially explicit agent‐based model to determine how spatial aggregation of parasites influences the distribution of parasite burdens across a range of parasite densities and host recovery rates. Our model simulates the random movement of hosts across landscapes with varying spatial configurations of areas occupied by environmental parasites, allowing hosts to acquire parasites they encounter and subsequently lose them. When parasites are more spatially aggregated in the environment, the aggregation of parasite burdens on hosts is higher (i.e., more hosts with few parasites, fewer hosts with many parasites), but the effect is less pronounced at high parasite density and fast host recovery rates. In addition, the correlation between individual hosts' final parasite burdens and their cumulative parasite burdens (including lost parasites) is greater at higher levels of spatial parasite aggregation. Our work suggests that fine‐scale spatial patterns of parasites can play a strong role in shaping how hosts are parasitized, particularly when parasite density is low‐to‐moderate and recovery rates are slow.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70324agent‐based modelparasite aggregationparasite ecologyspatial distribution
spellingShingle Chris Wojan
Allison K. Shaw
Meggan E. Craft
Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density
Ecosphere
agent‐based model
parasite aggregation
parasite ecology
spatial distribution
title Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density
title_full Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density
title_fullStr Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density
title_full_unstemmed Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density
title_short Parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations, but not at high parasite density
title_sort parasite spatial distribution shapes parasite aggregation on host populations but not at high parasite density
topic agent‐based model
parasite aggregation
parasite ecology
spatial distribution
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70324
work_keys_str_mv AT chriswojan parasitespatialdistributionshapesparasiteaggregationonhostpopulationsbutnotathighparasitedensity
AT allisonkshaw parasitespatialdistributionshapesparasiteaggregationonhostpopulationsbutnotathighparasitedensity
AT megganecraft parasitespatialdistributionshapesparasiteaggregationonhostpopulationsbutnotathighparasitedensity