PERHAPS HERETICAL
This is a brief reply to Matteo Marconi’s article. I have been challenged along with Marcello Tanca with the criticism of practicing a geography that is eccentric but unaware of the logical continuity between modernity and postmodernity. The suspicion is that the subversive impact of the “culturalis...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Firenze University Press
2019-11-01
|
| Series: | Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana |
| Online Access: | https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/bsgi/article/view/422 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839596527595552768 |
|---|---|
| author | Alessandra Bonazzi |
| author_facet | Alessandra Bonazzi |
| author_sort | Alessandra Bonazzi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This is a brief reply to Matteo Marconi’s article. I have been challenged along with Marcello Tanca with the criticism of practicing a geography that is eccentric but unaware of the logical continuity between modernity and postmodernity. The suspicion is that the subversive impact of the “culturalist” turning point is in fact compromised by a system of production of truth akin by logic, operation and subject to that of the modern era. I have therefore attempted to formulate a possible answer to these comments and to the critical insights of Matteo Marconi, whom I thank for having requested a response to his writing. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-db0b7e0611464a63aedf1d9cda3ea8a8 |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 1121-7820 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-11-01 |
| publisher | Firenze University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana |
| spelling | doaj-art-db0b7e0611464a63aedf1d9cda3ea8a82025-08-02T20:58:25ZengFirenze University PressBollettino della Società Geografica Italiana1121-78202019-11-018410.13128/bsgi.v8i4.422PERHAPS HERETICALAlessandra BonazziThis is a brief reply to Matteo Marconi’s article. I have been challenged along with Marcello Tanca with the criticism of practicing a geography that is eccentric but unaware of the logical continuity between modernity and postmodernity. The suspicion is that the subversive impact of the “culturalist” turning point is in fact compromised by a system of production of truth akin by logic, operation and subject to that of the modern era. I have therefore attempted to formulate a possible answer to these comments and to the critical insights of Matteo Marconi, whom I thank for having requested a response to his writing.https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/bsgi/article/view/422 |
| spellingShingle | Alessandra Bonazzi PERHAPS HERETICAL Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana |
| title | PERHAPS HERETICAL |
| title_full | PERHAPS HERETICAL |
| title_fullStr | PERHAPS HERETICAL |
| title_full_unstemmed | PERHAPS HERETICAL |
| title_short | PERHAPS HERETICAL |
| title_sort | perhaps heretical |
| url | https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/bsgi/article/view/422 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alessandrabonazzi perhapsheretical |