Comparison of Recognition Techniques to Classify Wear Particle Texture

Wear particle analysis, which identifies failure modes caused by the wear of various machine components, is an essential technique for monitoring machinery conditions. This analysis plays a vital role in predictive maintenance by revealing component degradation in machinery. This study proposes an a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Laghari, Ahmed Hassan, Mahmoud Haggag, Addy Wahyudie, Motaz Tayfor, Abdallah Elsayed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Eng
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4117/6/6/107
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839654176712294400
author Mohammad Laghari
Ahmed Hassan
Mahmoud Haggag
Addy Wahyudie
Motaz Tayfor
Abdallah Elsayed
author_facet Mohammad Laghari
Ahmed Hassan
Mahmoud Haggag
Addy Wahyudie
Motaz Tayfor
Abdallah Elsayed
author_sort Mohammad Laghari
collection DOAJ
description Wear particle analysis, which identifies failure modes caused by the wear of various machine components, is an essential technique for monitoring machinery conditions. This analysis plays a vital role in predictive maintenance by revealing component degradation in machinery. This study proposes an automated framework to classify four standard wear particle textures—rough, striated, pitted, and fatigued—using artificial neural networks (ANNs) combined with advanced image processing techniques. Images acquired via Charged-Coupled Device (CCD) microscopy were preprocessed using sharpening, histogram stretching, and four edge detection algorithms: Sobel, Laplacian, Boie–Cox, and Canny. The Laplacian and Canny methods yielded the highest classification accuracies of 97.9% and 98.9%, respectively. By minimizing human subjectivity, this automated approach enhances diagnostic consistency and represents a scalable solution for industrial condition monitoring.
format Article
id doaj-art-da8ac5acb72c44d6ac3dfad7c79fd18f
institution Matheson Library
issn 2673-4117
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Eng
spelling doaj-art-da8ac5acb72c44d6ac3dfad7c79fd18f2025-06-25T13:46:02ZengMDPI AGEng2673-41172025-05-016610710.3390/eng6060107Comparison of Recognition Techniques to Classify Wear Particle TextureMohammad Laghari0Ahmed Hassan1Mahmoud Haggag2Addy Wahyudie3Motaz Tayfor4Abdallah Elsayed5Department of Electrical and Communication Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab EmiratesDepartment of Architectural Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab EmiratesDepartment of Architectural Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab EmiratesDepartment of Electrical and Communication Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab EmiratesDepartment of Electrical and Communication Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab EmiratesDepartment of Electrical and Communication Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab EmiratesWear particle analysis, which identifies failure modes caused by the wear of various machine components, is an essential technique for monitoring machinery conditions. This analysis plays a vital role in predictive maintenance by revealing component degradation in machinery. This study proposes an automated framework to classify four standard wear particle textures—rough, striated, pitted, and fatigued—using artificial neural networks (ANNs) combined with advanced image processing techniques. Images acquired via Charged-Coupled Device (CCD) microscopy were preprocessed using sharpening, histogram stretching, and four edge detection algorithms: Sobel, Laplacian, Boie–Cox, and Canny. The Laplacian and Canny methods yielded the highest classification accuracies of 97.9% and 98.9%, respectively. By minimizing human subjectivity, this automated approach enhances diagnostic consistency and represents a scalable solution for industrial condition monitoring.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4117/6/6/107wear particlestexture identificationimage processingartificial neural networks
spellingShingle Mohammad Laghari
Ahmed Hassan
Mahmoud Haggag
Addy Wahyudie
Motaz Tayfor
Abdallah Elsayed
Comparison of Recognition Techniques to Classify Wear Particle Texture
Eng
wear particles
texture identification
image processing
artificial neural networks
title Comparison of Recognition Techniques to Classify Wear Particle Texture
title_full Comparison of Recognition Techniques to Classify Wear Particle Texture
title_fullStr Comparison of Recognition Techniques to Classify Wear Particle Texture
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Recognition Techniques to Classify Wear Particle Texture
title_short Comparison of Recognition Techniques to Classify Wear Particle Texture
title_sort comparison of recognition techniques to classify wear particle texture
topic wear particles
texture identification
image processing
artificial neural networks
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4117/6/6/107
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadlaghari comparisonofrecognitiontechniquestoclassifywearparticletexture
AT ahmedhassan comparisonofrecognitiontechniquestoclassifywearparticletexture
AT mahmoudhaggag comparisonofrecognitiontechniquestoclassifywearparticletexture
AT addywahyudie comparisonofrecognitiontechniquestoclassifywearparticletexture
AT motaztayfor comparisonofrecognitiontechniquestoclassifywearparticletexture
AT abdallahelsayed comparisonofrecognitiontechniquestoclassifywearparticletexture