The impact of scleral contact lenses correction of keratoconus on wave-front and accommodation parameters

Purpose: to evaluate the wave-front and accommodation changes in various stages of keratoconus corrected by scleral contact lenses.Material and methods. 20 patients (39 eyes) aged 18–37 with keratoconus of various stages (8 eyes with stage I, 3 eyes with stage II, 12 eyes stage II/III and 16 eyes wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. P. Tarutta, A. T. Khandzhyan, N. A. Tarasova, S. G. Harutyunyan, O. V. Guryanova, A. V. Ivanova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Real Time Ltd 2022-03-01
Series:Российский офтальмологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/888
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839586854874120192
author E. P. Tarutta
A. T. Khandzhyan
N. A. Tarasova
S. G. Harutyunyan
O. V. Guryanova
A. V. Ivanova
author_facet E. P. Tarutta
A. T. Khandzhyan
N. A. Tarasova
S. G. Harutyunyan
O. V. Guryanova
A. V. Ivanova
author_sort E. P. Tarutta
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: to evaluate the wave-front and accommodation changes in various stages of keratoconus corrected by scleral contact lenses.Material and methods. 20 patients (39 eyes) aged 18–37 with keratoconus of various stages (8 eyes with stage I, 3 eyes with stage II, 12 eyes stage II/III and 16 eyes with stage III wore OneFit or OneFitMed scleral lenses, made of hard gas-permeable material Contamac (Great Britain) with Dk 100 and mean thickness of 200–220 μm. All patients were examined using refractometry before and after cycloplegia, tested for uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, relative accommodation reserve (RAR), binocular and monocular accommodation response (with Grand Seiko Binocular Open Field Autorefkeratometer WR-5100K, Japan) for full spectacle correction and scleral contact lens correction. 17 patients (34 eyes) were tested for corneal aberrations with OPD Scan III aberrometer (Nidek) without correction and with scleral contact lenses.Results. Patients with keratoconus demonstrated a manifest form of refraction -5.26 ± 0.45 D (by sphere equivalent) and a cycloplegic refraction of -4.75 ± 0.33 D. Uncorrected visual acuity averaged 0.26 ± 0.05, increasing with full spectacled correction to 0.54 ± 0.07 and with scleral contact lenses correction to 0.95 ± 0.08. Keratoconus patients demonstrated binocular accommodative response (BAR) of +4.5 to -6.12 D averaging -1.43 ± 0.34 D with full spectacled correction diopters and of -0.5 to -8.13 D averaging - 2.83 ± 0.23 D with scleral contact lenses, р ≤ 0.01. We could not measure the BAR in 3 patients with keratoconus stage III. Monocular accommodative response (MAR)with a full correction with glasses averaged -0.98 ± 0.33 D (from + 6.0 to -5.0 D) with full spectacled correction and -2.41 ± 0.27 D (from +1.25 to -5.5 D) with scleral contact lenses, р ≤ 0.02. At the same time monocular accommodative response of 4 patients with keratoconus of the third stage of disease was not available to assess. So, accommodative response significant increased with scleral contact lenses. Positive relative accommodation with a full correction with glasses averaged 1.50 ± 0.35 D, with scleral contact lenses – 2.25 ± 0.29 D, р ≤ 0.01. The level of all aberrations, from lower to higher orders was significantly increased. With scleral contact lenses that correct the shape of the anterior surface of the cornea, the level of all corneal aberrations dropped to nearly normal values, while the coefficient of asphericity dropped below normal values, and the point spread function parameter (PSF) increased by fifteen times (to reach 0.06).Conclusions. Patients with keratoconus demonstrated a generally lower objective accommodative response as compared to normal values, but with the scleral lenses it increases to the normal level. Scleral contact lenses normalize corneal aberrations and increase the quality of vision. All of the above justifies the recommendation to use scleral contact lenses for optical correction of keratoconus to increase the vision, the accommodation response and visual comfort, including that of near-visual work.
format Article
id doaj-art-d9dea9f0e7ae4ea78e4a0bf26568ce05
institution Matheson Library
issn 2072-0076
2587-5760
language Russian
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Real Time Ltd
record_format Article
series Российский офтальмологический журнал
spelling doaj-art-d9dea9f0e7ae4ea78e4a0bf26568ce052025-08-03T19:22:34ZrusReal Time LtdРоссийский офтальмологический журнал2072-00762587-57602022-03-01151586310.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-1-58-63425The impact of scleral contact lenses correction of keratoconus on wave-front and accommodation parametersE. P. Tarutta0A. T. Khandzhyan1N. A. Tarasova2S. G. Harutyunyan3O. V. Guryanova4A. V. Ivanova5Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye DiseasesHelmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye DiseasesHelmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye DiseasesHelmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye DiseasesHelmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye DiseasesHelmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye DiseasesPurpose: to evaluate the wave-front and accommodation changes in various stages of keratoconus corrected by scleral contact lenses.Material and methods. 20 patients (39 eyes) aged 18–37 with keratoconus of various stages (8 eyes with stage I, 3 eyes with stage II, 12 eyes stage II/III and 16 eyes with stage III wore OneFit or OneFitMed scleral lenses, made of hard gas-permeable material Contamac (Great Britain) with Dk 100 and mean thickness of 200–220 μm. All patients were examined using refractometry before and after cycloplegia, tested for uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, relative accommodation reserve (RAR), binocular and monocular accommodation response (with Grand Seiko Binocular Open Field Autorefkeratometer WR-5100K, Japan) for full spectacle correction and scleral contact lens correction. 17 patients (34 eyes) were tested for corneal aberrations with OPD Scan III aberrometer (Nidek) without correction and with scleral contact lenses.Results. Patients with keratoconus demonstrated a manifest form of refraction -5.26 ± 0.45 D (by sphere equivalent) and a cycloplegic refraction of -4.75 ± 0.33 D. Uncorrected visual acuity averaged 0.26 ± 0.05, increasing with full spectacled correction to 0.54 ± 0.07 and with scleral contact lenses correction to 0.95 ± 0.08. Keratoconus patients demonstrated binocular accommodative response (BAR) of +4.5 to -6.12 D averaging -1.43 ± 0.34 D with full spectacled correction diopters and of -0.5 to -8.13 D averaging - 2.83 ± 0.23 D with scleral contact lenses, р ≤ 0.01. We could not measure the BAR in 3 patients with keratoconus stage III. Monocular accommodative response (MAR)with a full correction with glasses averaged -0.98 ± 0.33 D (from + 6.0 to -5.0 D) with full spectacled correction and -2.41 ± 0.27 D (from +1.25 to -5.5 D) with scleral contact lenses, р ≤ 0.02. At the same time monocular accommodative response of 4 patients with keratoconus of the third stage of disease was not available to assess. So, accommodative response significant increased with scleral contact lenses. Positive relative accommodation with a full correction with glasses averaged 1.50 ± 0.35 D, with scleral contact lenses – 2.25 ± 0.29 D, р ≤ 0.01. The level of all aberrations, from lower to higher orders was significantly increased. With scleral contact lenses that correct the shape of the anterior surface of the cornea, the level of all corneal aberrations dropped to nearly normal values, while the coefficient of asphericity dropped below normal values, and the point spread function parameter (PSF) increased by fifteen times (to reach 0.06).Conclusions. Patients with keratoconus demonstrated a generally lower objective accommodative response as compared to normal values, but with the scleral lenses it increases to the normal level. Scleral contact lenses normalize corneal aberrations and increase the quality of vision. All of the above justifies the recommendation to use scleral contact lenses for optical correction of keratoconus to increase the vision, the accommodation response and visual comfort, including that of near-visual work.https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/888corneakeratoconusaccommodationaberrometryscleral lenses
spellingShingle E. P. Tarutta
A. T. Khandzhyan
N. A. Tarasova
S. G. Harutyunyan
O. V. Guryanova
A. V. Ivanova
The impact of scleral contact lenses correction of keratoconus on wave-front and accommodation parameters
Российский офтальмологический журнал
cornea
keratoconus
accommodation
aberrometry
scleral lenses
title The impact of scleral contact lenses correction of keratoconus on wave-front and accommodation parameters
title_full The impact of scleral contact lenses correction of keratoconus on wave-front and accommodation parameters
title_fullStr The impact of scleral contact lenses correction of keratoconus on wave-front and accommodation parameters
title_full_unstemmed The impact of scleral contact lenses correction of keratoconus on wave-front and accommodation parameters
title_short The impact of scleral contact lenses correction of keratoconus on wave-front and accommodation parameters
title_sort impact of scleral contact lenses correction of keratoconus on wave front and accommodation parameters
topic cornea
keratoconus
accommodation
aberrometry
scleral lenses
url https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/888
work_keys_str_mv AT eptarutta theimpactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT atkhandzhyan theimpactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT natarasova theimpactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT sgharutyunyan theimpactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT ovguryanova theimpactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT avivanova theimpactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT eptarutta impactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT atkhandzhyan impactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT natarasova impactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT sgharutyunyan impactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT ovguryanova impactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters
AT avivanova impactofscleralcontactlensescorrectionofkeratoconusonwavefrontandaccommodationparameters