Influence of Copper Stoichiometric Composition and Compaction Method on Mechanical Properties of Cu<sub>x</sub>Se Thermoelectric Materials

This study investigates the structural and mechanical properties of Cu–Se-based thermoelectric materials with varying Cu:Se stoichiometries (1.8, 1.9, and 2.0). Phase composition was examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD), revealing a transition from a mixed α/β-phase in Cu:Se = 2.0 to a fully cubic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fani Stergioudi, Georgios Skordaris, Maria Pappa, Nikolaos Michailidis, Vasileios Pavlidis, Dimitrios Stathokostopoulos, Aikaterini Teknetzi, Lamprini Malletzidou, George Vourlias, Georgios Maliaris, Ioanna K. Sfampa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Metals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/15/6/640
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839653356239323136
author Fani Stergioudi
Georgios Skordaris
Maria Pappa
Nikolaos Michailidis
Vasileios Pavlidis
Dimitrios Stathokostopoulos
Aikaterini Teknetzi
Lamprini Malletzidou
George Vourlias
Georgios Maliaris
Ioanna K. Sfampa
author_facet Fani Stergioudi
Georgios Skordaris
Maria Pappa
Nikolaos Michailidis
Vasileios Pavlidis
Dimitrios Stathokostopoulos
Aikaterini Teknetzi
Lamprini Malletzidou
George Vourlias
Georgios Maliaris
Ioanna K. Sfampa
author_sort Fani Stergioudi
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the structural and mechanical properties of Cu–Se-based thermoelectric materials with varying Cu:Se stoichiometries (1.8, 1.9, and 2.0). Phase composition was examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD), revealing a transition from a mixed α/β-phase in Cu:Se = 2.0 to a fully cubic β-phase Cu<sub>2−x</sub>Se in Cu:Se = 1.8. Crystallite size analysis showed a reduction with increasing Cu content, which strongly influenced mechanical behavior. Vickers microhardness and nanoindentation tests were employed to assess hardness, elastic modulus, and elastic recovery. The Cu:Se = 2.0 sample exhibited the highest hardness but the lowest elastic recovery and elastic modulus from indentation, suggesting strong intragrain cohesion but limited elastic deformation due to fine grain structure. In contrast, the sub-stoichiometric Cu:Se = 1.8 phase displayed higher elastic modulus and recovery, possibly due to a more rigid Se sub-lattice and defect-mediated deformation mechanisms. Compression tests confirmed the higher bulk modulus in the Cu-deficient phase. Bending tests also showed that the Cu-deficient phase exhibited the highest bending modulus, further supporting its enhanced stiffness under elastic deformation. These results highlight the significant role of stoichiometry and crystallite structure in tuning the mechanical response of thermoelectric Cu–Se compounds, with implications for their durability and performance in practical applications.
format Article
id doaj-art-d9261784f05e40a38f5d8d4ee372f852
institution Matheson Library
issn 2075-4701
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Metals
spelling doaj-art-d9261784f05e40a38f5d8d4ee372f8522025-06-25T14:10:53ZengMDPI AGMetals2075-47012025-06-0115664010.3390/met15060640Influence of Copper Stoichiometric Composition and Compaction Method on Mechanical Properties of Cu<sub>x</sub>Se Thermoelectric MaterialsFani Stergioudi0Georgios Skordaris1Maria Pappa2Nikolaos Michailidis3Vasileios Pavlidis4Dimitrios Stathokostopoulos5Aikaterini Teknetzi6Lamprini Malletzidou7George Vourlias8Georgios Maliaris9Ioanna K. Sfampa10Physical Metallurgy Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceLaboratory for Machine Tools and Manufacturing Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreecePhysical Metallurgy Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreecePhysical Metallurgy Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceLaboratory of Advanced Materials & Devices, School of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceLaboratory of Advanced Materials & Devices, School of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceLaboratory of Advanced Materials & Devices, School of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceLaboratory of Advanced Materials & Devices, School of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceLaboratory of Advanced Materials & Devices, School of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceHephaestus Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, School of Science, Democritus University of Thrace, 65404 Kavala, GreeceGroup R&D, KLEEMANN, Industrial Area of Kilkis, 61100 Kilkis, GreeceThis study investigates the structural and mechanical properties of Cu–Se-based thermoelectric materials with varying Cu:Se stoichiometries (1.8, 1.9, and 2.0). Phase composition was examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD), revealing a transition from a mixed α/β-phase in Cu:Se = 2.0 to a fully cubic β-phase Cu<sub>2−x</sub>Se in Cu:Se = 1.8. Crystallite size analysis showed a reduction with increasing Cu content, which strongly influenced mechanical behavior. Vickers microhardness and nanoindentation tests were employed to assess hardness, elastic modulus, and elastic recovery. The Cu:Se = 2.0 sample exhibited the highest hardness but the lowest elastic recovery and elastic modulus from indentation, suggesting strong intragrain cohesion but limited elastic deformation due to fine grain structure. In contrast, the sub-stoichiometric Cu:Se = 1.8 phase displayed higher elastic modulus and recovery, possibly due to a more rigid Se sub-lattice and defect-mediated deformation mechanisms. Compression tests confirmed the higher bulk modulus in the Cu-deficient phase. Bending tests also showed that the Cu-deficient phase exhibited the highest bending modulus, further supporting its enhanced stiffness under elastic deformation. These results highlight the significant role of stoichiometry and crystallite structure in tuning the mechanical response of thermoelectric Cu–Se compounds, with implications for their durability and performance in practical applications.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/15/6/640copper selenidethermoelectric materialsmicrohardnessnanoindentationelastic modulusflexular modulus
spellingShingle Fani Stergioudi
Georgios Skordaris
Maria Pappa
Nikolaos Michailidis
Vasileios Pavlidis
Dimitrios Stathokostopoulos
Aikaterini Teknetzi
Lamprini Malletzidou
George Vourlias
Georgios Maliaris
Ioanna K. Sfampa
Influence of Copper Stoichiometric Composition and Compaction Method on Mechanical Properties of Cu<sub>x</sub>Se Thermoelectric Materials
Metals
copper selenide
thermoelectric materials
microhardness
nanoindentation
elastic modulus
flexular modulus
title Influence of Copper Stoichiometric Composition and Compaction Method on Mechanical Properties of Cu<sub>x</sub>Se Thermoelectric Materials
title_full Influence of Copper Stoichiometric Composition and Compaction Method on Mechanical Properties of Cu<sub>x</sub>Se Thermoelectric Materials
title_fullStr Influence of Copper Stoichiometric Composition and Compaction Method on Mechanical Properties of Cu<sub>x</sub>Se Thermoelectric Materials
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Copper Stoichiometric Composition and Compaction Method on Mechanical Properties of Cu<sub>x</sub>Se Thermoelectric Materials
title_short Influence of Copper Stoichiometric Composition and Compaction Method on Mechanical Properties of Cu<sub>x</sub>Se Thermoelectric Materials
title_sort influence of copper stoichiometric composition and compaction method on mechanical properties of cu sub x sub se thermoelectric materials
topic copper selenide
thermoelectric materials
microhardness
nanoindentation
elastic modulus
flexular modulus
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/15/6/640
work_keys_str_mv AT fanistergioudi influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT georgiosskordaris influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT mariapappa influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT nikolaosmichailidis influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT vasileiospavlidis influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT dimitriosstathokostopoulos influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT aikateriniteknetzi influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT lamprinimalletzidou influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT georgevourlias influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT georgiosmaliaris influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials
AT ioannaksfampa influenceofcopperstoichiometriccompositionandcompactionmethodonmechanicalpropertiesofcusubxsubsethermoelectricmaterials