Indigenous Abolition and the Third Space of Indian Child Welfare

This article introduces the Third Space of Indian child welfare to theorize how Indigenous nations simultaneously engage and disrupt settler legal systems while building sovereign, care-based alternatives. Drawing from legal analysis, Indigenous political thought, and sociohistorical synthesis, I tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Theresa Ysabel Rocha Beardall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Genealogy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/9/2/59
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839653933241335808
author Theresa Ysabel Rocha Beardall
author_facet Theresa Ysabel Rocha Beardall
author_sort Theresa Ysabel Rocha Beardall
collection DOAJ
description This article introduces the Third Space of Indian child welfare to theorize how Indigenous nations simultaneously engage and disrupt settler legal systems while building sovereign, care-based alternatives. Drawing from legal analysis, Indigenous political thought, and sociohistorical synthesis, I trace the historical continuity from boarding schools to today’s foster care removals, showing how child welfare operates as a colonial apparatus of family separation. In response, Native nations enact governance through three interrelated strategies: strategic legal engagement, kinship-based care, and tribally controlled family collectives. Building on Bruyneel’s theory of third space sovereignty, Simpson’s nested sovereignty, and Lightfoot’s global Indigenous rights framework, I conceptualize the Third Space as a dynamic field of Indigenous governance that transcends binary settler logics. These practices constitute sovereign abolitionist praxis. They reclaim kinship, resist carceral systems, and build collective futures beyond settler rule. Thus, rather than treating the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) as a federal safeguard, I argue that tribes have repurposed ICWA as a legal and political vehicle for relational governance. This reframing challenges dominant crisis-based narratives and positions Indigenous child welfare as the center of a “global Indigenous politics of care” with implications for theories of sovereignty, family, and abolitionist futures across disciplines, geographies, and social groups. The article concludes by reflecting on the broader implications of the Third Space for other Indigenous and minoritized communities navigating state control and asserting self-determined care.
format Article
id doaj-art-d8708c8f4e7342e29ce4102f6375c1cc
institution Matheson Library
issn 2313-5778
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Genealogy
spelling doaj-art-d8708c8f4e7342e29ce4102f6375c1cc2025-06-25T13:54:03ZengMDPI AGGenealogy2313-57782025-05-01925910.3390/genealogy9020059Indigenous Abolition and the Third Space of Indian Child WelfareTheresa Ysabel Rocha Beardall0Department of Sociology, University of Washington, 211 Savery Hall–Box 353340, Seattle, WA 98195, USAThis article introduces the Third Space of Indian child welfare to theorize how Indigenous nations simultaneously engage and disrupt settler legal systems while building sovereign, care-based alternatives. Drawing from legal analysis, Indigenous political thought, and sociohistorical synthesis, I trace the historical continuity from boarding schools to today’s foster care removals, showing how child welfare operates as a colonial apparatus of family separation. In response, Native nations enact governance through three interrelated strategies: strategic legal engagement, kinship-based care, and tribally controlled family collectives. Building on Bruyneel’s theory of third space sovereignty, Simpson’s nested sovereignty, and Lightfoot’s global Indigenous rights framework, I conceptualize the Third Space as a dynamic field of Indigenous governance that transcends binary settler logics. These practices constitute sovereign abolitionist praxis. They reclaim kinship, resist carceral systems, and build collective futures beyond settler rule. Thus, rather than treating the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) as a federal safeguard, I argue that tribes have repurposed ICWA as a legal and political vehicle for relational governance. This reframing challenges dominant crisis-based narratives and positions Indigenous child welfare as the center of a “global Indigenous politics of care” with implications for theories of sovereignty, family, and abolitionist futures across disciplines, geographies, and social groups. The article concludes by reflecting on the broader implications of the Third Space for other Indigenous and minoritized communities navigating state control and asserting self-determined care.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/9/2/59Indian child Welfare Act (ICWA)Indigenous sovereigntyabolitionsettler colonialismfamily separationglobal Indigenous politics of care
spellingShingle Theresa Ysabel Rocha Beardall
Indigenous Abolition and the Third Space of Indian Child Welfare
Genealogy
Indian child Welfare Act (ICWA)
Indigenous sovereignty
abolition
settler colonialism
family separation
global Indigenous politics of care
title Indigenous Abolition and the Third Space of Indian Child Welfare
title_full Indigenous Abolition and the Third Space of Indian Child Welfare
title_fullStr Indigenous Abolition and the Third Space of Indian Child Welfare
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous Abolition and the Third Space of Indian Child Welfare
title_short Indigenous Abolition and the Third Space of Indian Child Welfare
title_sort indigenous abolition and the third space of indian child welfare
topic Indian child Welfare Act (ICWA)
Indigenous sovereignty
abolition
settler colonialism
family separation
global Indigenous politics of care
url https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/9/2/59
work_keys_str_mv AT theresaysabelrochabeardall indigenousabolitionandthethirdspaceofindianchildwelfare