Dual Collection Channels Under a Carbon Tax Scheme in CLSC: Decentralized vs. Alliance

This paper compares dual collection mode strategies under carbon tax regulation: (1) a decentralized strategy when both manufacturer and retailer collect EoL independently and they determine their pricing and collection decision separately and (2) an alliance strategy by incorporating backward integ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nur Layli Rachmawati, Chung-Chi Hsieh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Engineering Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/84/1/21
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839654123622891520
author Nur Layli Rachmawati
Chung-Chi Hsieh
author_facet Nur Layli Rachmawati
Chung-Chi Hsieh
author_sort Nur Layli Rachmawati
collection DOAJ
description This paper compares dual collection mode strategies under carbon tax regulation: (1) a decentralized strategy when both manufacturer and retailer collect EoL independently and they determine their pricing and collection decision separately and (2) an alliance strategy by incorporating backward integration, when manufacturer and retailer make an alliance to recycle EoL but their pricing decisions are determined independently. The results show that the alliance strategy performs better in terms of total supply chain profit. Performing alliances benefits the manufacturer and supply chain.
format Article
id doaj-art-d6cd4bbed8444b158b51f275669e6bf7
institution Matheson Library
issn 2673-4591
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Engineering Proceedings
spelling doaj-art-d6cd4bbed8444b158b51f275669e6bf72025-06-25T13:46:34ZengMDPI AGEngineering Proceedings2673-45912025-01-018412110.3390/engproc2025084021Dual Collection Channels Under a Carbon Tax Scheme in CLSC: Decentralized vs. AllianceNur Layli Rachmawati0Chung-Chi Hsieh1Department of Industrial and Information Management, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, TaiwanDepartment of Industrial and Information Management, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, TaiwanThis paper compares dual collection mode strategies under carbon tax regulation: (1) a decentralized strategy when both manufacturer and retailer collect EoL independently and they determine their pricing and collection decision separately and (2) an alliance strategy by incorporating backward integration, when manufacturer and retailer make an alliance to recycle EoL but their pricing decisions are determined independently. The results show that the alliance strategy performs better in terms of total supply chain profit. Performing alliances benefits the manufacturer and supply chain.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/84/1/21alliance strategycarbon taxclosed-loop supply chaindual collection channels
spellingShingle Nur Layli Rachmawati
Chung-Chi Hsieh
Dual Collection Channels Under a Carbon Tax Scheme in CLSC: Decentralized vs. Alliance
Engineering Proceedings
alliance strategy
carbon tax
closed-loop supply chain
dual collection channels
title Dual Collection Channels Under a Carbon Tax Scheme in CLSC: Decentralized vs. Alliance
title_full Dual Collection Channels Under a Carbon Tax Scheme in CLSC: Decentralized vs. Alliance
title_fullStr Dual Collection Channels Under a Carbon Tax Scheme in CLSC: Decentralized vs. Alliance
title_full_unstemmed Dual Collection Channels Under a Carbon Tax Scheme in CLSC: Decentralized vs. Alliance
title_short Dual Collection Channels Under a Carbon Tax Scheme in CLSC: Decentralized vs. Alliance
title_sort dual collection channels under a carbon tax scheme in clsc decentralized vs alliance
topic alliance strategy
carbon tax
closed-loop supply chain
dual collection channels
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/84/1/21
work_keys_str_mv AT nurlaylirachmawati dualcollectionchannelsunderacarbontaxschemeinclscdecentralizedvsalliance
AT chungchihsieh dualcollectionchannelsunderacarbontaxschemeinclscdecentralizedvsalliance