Dual Collection Channels Under a Carbon Tax Scheme in CLSC: Decentralized vs. Alliance
This paper compares dual collection mode strategies under carbon tax regulation: (1) a decentralized strategy when both manufacturer and retailer collect EoL independently and they determine their pricing and collection decision separately and (2) an alliance strategy by incorporating backward integ...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Engineering Proceedings |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/84/1/21 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This paper compares dual collection mode strategies under carbon tax regulation: (1) a decentralized strategy when both manufacturer and retailer collect EoL independently and they determine their pricing and collection decision separately and (2) an alliance strategy by incorporating backward integration, when manufacturer and retailer make an alliance to recycle EoL but their pricing decisions are determined independently. The results show that the alliance strategy performs better in terms of total supply chain profit. Performing alliances benefits the manufacturer and supply chain. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2673-4591 |