Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence
Access to safe, affordable, and supported abortion care is a crucial component of reproductive justice and human rights. Abortion seekers consider nurses and midwives to be more supportive than other health professionals. Nurses and midwives have long been recommended providers of comprehensive abor...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/26410397.2025.2518672 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839649196378947584 |
|---|---|
| author | Martha Nicholson Lesley Hoggart |
| author_facet | Martha Nicholson Lesley Hoggart |
| author_sort | Martha Nicholson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Access to safe, affordable, and supported abortion care is a crucial component of reproductive justice and human rights. Abortion seekers consider nurses and midwives to be more supportive than other health professionals. Nurses and midwives have long been recommended providers of comprehensive abortion care, including second trimester care. This iterative scoping review aimed to explore the evidence on abortion learning mechanisms available to nurses and midwives and what can be improved about abortion training. Using the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and Levac et al (2010) scoping review frameworks, four databases were searched, resulting in 879 articles published in English from 01.01.2010- 01.08.2024. The authors included 43 studies and identified five learning mechanisms. The evidence is presented under three themes: 1) the adequacy of abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives, 2) listening to nurses and midwives’ experiences, and 3) barriers to abortion training. This review found that in almost all legal and practice contexts, abortion training may be de-prioritised and hard to access because of institutional barriers, especially in centres of education. In conclusion, there is a low investment in abortion training for nurses and midwives. Policy makers, health care systems and educators should consider ways to continuously instil nurses and midwives with skills, confidence, and social authority to provide person-centred abortion care to combat harmful bias and mitigate the risk of reproductive coercion. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d6c79f076b28495cb83eb66f74429b05 |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 2641-0397 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters |
| spelling | doaj-art-d6c79f076b28495cb83eb66f74429b052025-06-27T10:35:05ZengTaylor & Francis GroupSexual and Reproductive Health Matters2641-03972025-06-0112710.1080/26410397.2025.2518672Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidenceMartha Nicholson0Lesley Hoggart1PhD Researcher, The International Planned Parenthood Federation, London, UKProfessor, Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UKAccess to safe, affordable, and supported abortion care is a crucial component of reproductive justice and human rights. Abortion seekers consider nurses and midwives to be more supportive than other health professionals. Nurses and midwives have long been recommended providers of comprehensive abortion care, including second trimester care. This iterative scoping review aimed to explore the evidence on abortion learning mechanisms available to nurses and midwives and what can be improved about abortion training. Using the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and Levac et al (2010) scoping review frameworks, four databases were searched, resulting in 879 articles published in English from 01.01.2010- 01.08.2024. The authors included 43 studies and identified five learning mechanisms. The evidence is presented under three themes: 1) the adequacy of abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives, 2) listening to nurses and midwives’ experiences, and 3) barriers to abortion training. This review found that in almost all legal and practice contexts, abortion training may be de-prioritised and hard to access because of institutional barriers, especially in centres of education. In conclusion, there is a low investment in abortion training for nurses and midwives. Policy makers, health care systems and educators should consider ways to continuously instil nurses and midwives with skills, confidence, and social authority to provide person-centred abortion care to combat harmful bias and mitigate the risk of reproductive coercion.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/26410397.2025.2518672abortionscoping reviewtrainingEducationnursingmidwifery |
| spellingShingle | Martha Nicholson Lesley Hoggart Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters abortion scoping review training Education nursing midwifery |
| title | Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence |
| title_full | Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence |
| title_fullStr | Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence |
| title_full_unstemmed | Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence |
| title_short | Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence |
| title_sort | abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives a scoping review of evidence |
| topic | abortion scoping review training Education nursing midwifery |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/26410397.2025.2518672 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marthanicholson abortionlearningmechanismsfornursesandmidwivesascopingreviewofevidence AT lesleyhoggart abortionlearningmechanismsfornursesandmidwivesascopingreviewofevidence |