Comparative assessment of long-term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: a data from the RIMIS registry

Aim. To compare the long-term prognosis of life of patients after primary and recurrent acute myocardial infarction (MI).Material and methods. The study was based on the RIMIS registry, which included all patients after transmural MI in 2017 in one of the Moscow vascular centers. The prospective par...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Yu. Martsevich, O. S. Afonina, A. V. Zagrebelnyy, D. P Sichinava, I. V. Samorodskaya, Yu. V. Avdeev, I. Yu Avdeeva, T. R. Gvindzhilia, I. M. Kuzmina, O. M. Drapkina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC 2024-06-01
Series:Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4001
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839577728104267776
author S. Yu. Martsevich
O. S. Afonina
A. V. Zagrebelnyy
D. P Sichinava
I. V. Samorodskaya
Yu. V. Avdeev
I. Yu Avdeeva
T. R. Gvindzhilia
I. M. Kuzmina
O. M. Drapkina
author_facet S. Yu. Martsevich
O. S. Afonina
A. V. Zagrebelnyy
D. P Sichinava
I. V. Samorodskaya
Yu. V. Avdeev
I. Yu Avdeeva
T. R. Gvindzhilia
I. M. Kuzmina
O. M. Drapkina
author_sort S. Yu. Martsevich
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To compare the long-term prognosis of life of patients after primary and recurrent acute myocardial infarction (MI).Material and methods. The study was based on the RIMIS registry, which included all patients after transmural MI in 2017 in one of the Moscow vascular centers. The prospective part included 191 patients who survived the acute stage of MI, of which 145 suffered a primary acute MI, 46 — a recurrent acute MI. Long-term follow-up data were collected 71 (53;75) months after discharge from the hospital. The primary endpoint was any-cause death.Results. During the follow-up period, 35 (25,2%) patients with a primary MI and 25 (64,1%) patients with a recurrent MI died (p<0,001). It was not possible to establish the fate of 13 (6,81%) patients, of which 7 (4,83%) were people with primary MI and 6 (13,04%) people with recurrent MI. The death risk was significantly higher in patients who had a recurrent MI compared to patients who had a primary MI: hazard ratio (HR)=3,52 (2,09;5,96), p<0,001). An unfavorable prognosis was determined not by the fact of a recurrent MI, but by the complications that resulted from a previous MI, primarily heart failure, as well as age, sex, smoking status, and hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases in the year before the reference MI, history of angina and following comorbidities: a prior stroke, major bleeding (life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding requiring complex surgical intervention). Patients who had a recurrent MI were significantly more adherent to follow-up and prescribed therapy.Conclusion. Despite the modern strategy for treating MI both in the acute stage and in the long-term period, the prognosis after recurrent MI remains unfavorable. Signs negatively affecting the prognosis were sex, age, a history of heart failure and angina pectoris, and hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases one year prior to reference MI.
format Article
id doaj-art-d5fc3ca4bc2d44dfb57bc9cc03d0f34f
institution Matheson Library
issn 1728-8800
2619-0125
language Russian
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC
record_format Article
series Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
spelling doaj-art-d5fc3ca4bc2d44dfb57bc9cc03d0f34f2025-08-04T12:50:32Zrus«SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLCКардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика1728-88002619-01252024-06-0123510.15829/1728-8800-2024-40012988Comparative assessment of long-term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: a data from the RIMIS registryS. Yu. Martsevich0O. S. Afonina1A. V. Zagrebelnyy2D. P Sichinava3I. V. Samorodskaya4Yu. V. Avdeev5I. Yu Avdeeva6T. R. Gvindzhilia7I. M. Kuzmina8O. M. Drapkina9National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive MedicineNational Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine; Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency MedicineNational Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine; Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency MedicineCity Clinic № 9National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive MedicineSklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency MedicineSklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency MedicineSklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency MedicineSklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency MedicineNational Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive MedicineAim. To compare the long-term prognosis of life of patients after primary and recurrent acute myocardial infarction (MI).Material and methods. The study was based on the RIMIS registry, which included all patients after transmural MI in 2017 in one of the Moscow vascular centers. The prospective part included 191 patients who survived the acute stage of MI, of which 145 suffered a primary acute MI, 46 — a recurrent acute MI. Long-term follow-up data were collected 71 (53;75) months after discharge from the hospital. The primary endpoint was any-cause death.Results. During the follow-up period, 35 (25,2%) patients with a primary MI and 25 (64,1%) patients with a recurrent MI died (p<0,001). It was not possible to establish the fate of 13 (6,81%) patients, of which 7 (4,83%) were people with primary MI and 6 (13,04%) people with recurrent MI. The death risk was significantly higher in patients who had a recurrent MI compared to patients who had a primary MI: hazard ratio (HR)=3,52 (2,09;5,96), p<0,001). An unfavorable prognosis was determined not by the fact of a recurrent MI, but by the complications that resulted from a previous MI, primarily heart failure, as well as age, sex, smoking status, and hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases in the year before the reference MI, history of angina and following comorbidities: a prior stroke, major bleeding (life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding requiring complex surgical intervention). Patients who had a recurrent MI were significantly more adherent to follow-up and prescribed therapy.Conclusion. Despite the modern strategy for treating MI both in the acute stage and in the long-term period, the prognosis after recurrent MI remains unfavorable. Signs negatively affecting the prognosis were sex, age, a history of heart failure and angina pectoris, and hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases one year prior to reference MI.https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4001myocardial infarctionrecurrent myocardial infarctionregistrylong-term mortalitylong-term predictors of death
spellingShingle S. Yu. Martsevich
O. S. Afonina
A. V. Zagrebelnyy
D. P Sichinava
I. V. Samorodskaya
Yu. V. Avdeev
I. Yu Avdeeva
T. R. Gvindzhilia
I. M. Kuzmina
O. M. Drapkina
Comparative assessment of long-term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: a data from the RIMIS registry
Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
myocardial infarction
recurrent myocardial infarction
registry
long-term mortality
long-term predictors of death
title Comparative assessment of long-term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: a data from the RIMIS registry
title_full Comparative assessment of long-term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: a data from the RIMIS registry
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of long-term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: a data from the RIMIS registry
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of long-term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: a data from the RIMIS registry
title_short Comparative assessment of long-term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: a data from the RIMIS registry
title_sort comparative assessment of long term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction a data from the rimis registry
topic myocardial infarction
recurrent myocardial infarction
registry
long-term mortality
long-term predictors of death
url https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4001
work_keys_str_mv AT syumartsevich comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry
AT osafonina comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry
AT avzagrebelnyy comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry
AT dpsichinava comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry
AT ivsamorodskaya comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry
AT yuvavdeev comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry
AT iyuavdeeva comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry
AT trgvindzhilia comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry
AT imkuzmina comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry
AT omdrapkina comparativeassessmentoflongtermsurvivalofpatientsafterprimaryandrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionadatafromtherimisregistry