Assessing visitors' willingness to pay for mitigating recreational impacts on lakes ecosystems: a comparative study between Portugal and Nepal

Introduction: The growing demand for recreational activities in natural areas often results in environmental degradation, jeopardising the sustainability of these ecosystems. Understanding visitors’ willingness to pay (WTP) to mitigate these impacts is crucial for supporting the sustainable managem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mário Almendra, Eduardo Pinheiro, Cláudia Costa, Márcio Martins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Politécnico de Viseu 2025-07-01
Series:Millenium
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.rcaap.pt/millenium/article/view/41052
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839619332534960128
author Mário Almendra
Eduardo Pinheiro
Cláudia Costa
Márcio Martins
author_facet Mário Almendra
Eduardo Pinheiro
Cláudia Costa
Márcio Martins
author_sort Mário Almendra
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The growing demand for recreational activities in natural areas often results in environmental degradation, jeopardising the sustainability of these ecosystems. Understanding visitors’ willingness to pay (WTP) to mitigate these impacts is crucial for supporting the sustainable management of these areas. Objective This paper compares users’ WTP to mitigate the impact of recreational activities at the Azibo Reservoir Beaches (ARB) (Portugal) and the Ghodaghodi Lake Complex (Nepal). Methods: A quantitative on-site survey was conducted at the ARB, with 573 validated responses (95.5%). The Contingent Valuation Method was used to estimate visitors’ WTP for the use and non-use of public goods. Results: Respondents showed a slightly higher WTP for environmental preservation (non-use public goods) compared to infrastructure and services (use public goods). The annual WTP estimation for the ARB suggests a significantly higher valuation — approximately 3.4 times — than the comparable study in Nepal. Conclusion: The findings emphasise the significance of assigning economic value to natural resources for improved policy and management decisions. However, limitations include reliance on survey data and contextual differences among sites. Future research should adopt broader methodologies and representative samples to enhance comparability and robustness.
format Article
id doaj-art-d3bdcfec512e40abb2c8dc936a34f7a3
institution Matheson Library
issn 0873-3015
1647-662X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Instituto Politécnico de Viseu
record_format Article
series Millenium
spelling doaj-art-d3bdcfec512e40abb2c8dc936a34f7a32025-07-23T09:18:15ZengInstituto Politécnico de ViseuMillenium0873-30151647-662X2025-07-01219e10.29352/mill0219e.41052Assessing visitors' willingness to pay for mitigating recreational impacts on lakes ecosystems: a comparative study between Portugal and NepalMário Almendra0Eduardo Pinheiro1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-3363Cláudia Costa2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-2218Márcio Martins3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-3155Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, PortugalInstituto Politécnico de Viseu, Viseu, Portugal | CITeD - Centro de Investigação Transdisciplinar em Educação e Desenvolvimento, Bragança, Portugal Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal | CITeD - Centro de Investigação Transdisciplinar em Educação e Desenvolvimento, Bragança, Portugal Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal | CITeD - Centro de Investigação Transdisciplinar em Educação e Desenvolvimento, Bragança, Portugal Introduction: The growing demand for recreational activities in natural areas often results in environmental degradation, jeopardising the sustainability of these ecosystems. Understanding visitors’ willingness to pay (WTP) to mitigate these impacts is crucial for supporting the sustainable management of these areas. Objective This paper compares users’ WTP to mitigate the impact of recreational activities at the Azibo Reservoir Beaches (ARB) (Portugal) and the Ghodaghodi Lake Complex (Nepal). Methods: A quantitative on-site survey was conducted at the ARB, with 573 validated responses (95.5%). The Contingent Valuation Method was used to estimate visitors’ WTP for the use and non-use of public goods. Results: Respondents showed a slightly higher WTP for environmental preservation (non-use public goods) compared to infrastructure and services (use public goods). The annual WTP estimation for the ARB suggests a significantly higher valuation — approximately 3.4 times — than the comparable study in Nepal. Conclusion: The findings emphasise the significance of assigning economic value to natural resources for improved policy and management decisions. However, limitations include reliance on survey data and contextual differences among sites. Future research should adopt broader methodologies and representative samples to enhance comparability and robustness. https://revistas.rcaap.pt/millenium/article/view/41052willingness to pay; recreational impacts; contingent valuation method; environmental valuation; sustainable tourism
spellingShingle Mário Almendra
Eduardo Pinheiro
Cláudia Costa
Márcio Martins
Assessing visitors' willingness to pay for mitigating recreational impacts on lakes ecosystems: a comparative study between Portugal and Nepal
Millenium
willingness to pay; recreational impacts; contingent valuation method; environmental valuation; sustainable tourism
title Assessing visitors' willingness to pay for mitigating recreational impacts on lakes ecosystems: a comparative study between Portugal and Nepal
title_full Assessing visitors' willingness to pay for mitigating recreational impacts on lakes ecosystems: a comparative study between Portugal and Nepal
title_fullStr Assessing visitors' willingness to pay for mitigating recreational impacts on lakes ecosystems: a comparative study between Portugal and Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Assessing visitors' willingness to pay for mitigating recreational impacts on lakes ecosystems: a comparative study between Portugal and Nepal
title_short Assessing visitors' willingness to pay for mitigating recreational impacts on lakes ecosystems: a comparative study between Portugal and Nepal
title_sort assessing visitors willingness to pay for mitigating recreational impacts on lakes ecosystems a comparative study between portugal and nepal
topic willingness to pay; recreational impacts; contingent valuation method; environmental valuation; sustainable tourism
url https://revistas.rcaap.pt/millenium/article/view/41052
work_keys_str_mv AT marioalmendra assessingvisitorswillingnesstopayformitigatingrecreationalimpactsonlakesecosystemsacomparativestudybetweenportugalandnepal
AT eduardopinheiro assessingvisitorswillingnesstopayformitigatingrecreationalimpactsonlakesecosystemsacomparativestudybetweenportugalandnepal
AT claudiacosta assessingvisitorswillingnesstopayformitigatingrecreationalimpactsonlakesecosystemsacomparativestudybetweenportugalandnepal
AT marciomartins assessingvisitorswillingnesstopayformitigatingrecreationalimpactsonlakesecosystemsacomparativestudybetweenportugalandnepal