VARIABLES OF QUANTIFYING REPUTATIONAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM UNFAIR COMPETITION ACTIONS
The problem of quantifying the reputational damage resulting from unfair competition actions derives mainly from the lack of contextually established criteria. In the same sense, the lack of relevant judicial precedents amplifies the precarious state of the system of indicative benchmarks in order t...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (AESM), Center for Studies in European Integration
2024-06-01
|
Series: | Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://csei.ase.md/journal/files/issue_101/EEJRS_Issue10.1_page-120-136.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1839596891292041216 |
---|---|
author | Iulian MORARU |
author_facet | Iulian MORARU |
author_sort | Iulian MORARU |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The problem of quantifying the reputational damage resulting from unfair competition actions derives mainly from the lack of contextually established criteria. In the same sense, the lack of relevant judicial precedents amplifies the precarious state of the system of indicative benchmarks in order to assess the damage to reputation as a result of affecting the rights and legitimate interests of the victims of unfair competition actions. Foreign methodological systems for quantifying damages caused by unfair competition actions could represent points of reference for the domestic legislator in the idea of solving practical difficulties in the process of assessing damages caused by unfair competition actions. An eloquent example could be considered the French model for evaluating the economic damage resulting from actions of unfair competition, developed by notorious practitioners in the field in question. The methodological sheets are generically called „La réparation du préjudice économique. Fiches méthodologiques et glossaire - 3e édition (2024)”. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-d200b0a236544a1fbdd5d18cde5b955b |
institution | Matheson Library |
issn | 1857-436X 2537-6179 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
publisher | Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (AESM), Center for Studies in European Integration |
record_format | Article |
series | Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies |
spelling | doaj-art-d200b0a236544a1fbdd5d18cde5b955b2025-08-02T20:07:42ZengAcademy of Economic Studies of Moldova (AESM), Center for Studies in European IntegrationEastern European Journal of Regional Studies1857-436X2537-61792024-06-01101120136https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.10-1.07VARIABLES OF QUANTIFYING REPUTATIONAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM UNFAIR COMPETITION ACTIONSIulian MORARU0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3670-5665Moldova State UniversityThe problem of quantifying the reputational damage resulting from unfair competition actions derives mainly from the lack of contextually established criteria. In the same sense, the lack of relevant judicial precedents amplifies the precarious state of the system of indicative benchmarks in order to assess the damage to reputation as a result of affecting the rights and legitimate interests of the victims of unfair competition actions. Foreign methodological systems for quantifying damages caused by unfair competition actions could represent points of reference for the domestic legislator in the idea of solving practical difficulties in the process of assessing damages caused by unfair competition actions. An eloquent example could be considered the French model for evaluating the economic damage resulting from actions of unfair competition, developed by notorious practitioners in the field in question. The methodological sheets are generically called „La réparation du préjudice économique. Fiches méthodologiques et glossaire - 3e édition (2024)”.https://csei.ase.md/journal/files/issue_101/EEJRS_Issue10.1_page-120-136.pdfquantificationassessmentharmdamageunfair competitioncriteriamethodology |
spellingShingle | Iulian MORARU VARIABLES OF QUANTIFYING REPUTATIONAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM UNFAIR COMPETITION ACTIONS Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies quantification assessment harm damage unfair competition criteria methodology |
title | VARIABLES OF QUANTIFYING REPUTATIONAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM UNFAIR COMPETITION ACTIONS |
title_full | VARIABLES OF QUANTIFYING REPUTATIONAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM UNFAIR COMPETITION ACTIONS |
title_fullStr | VARIABLES OF QUANTIFYING REPUTATIONAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM UNFAIR COMPETITION ACTIONS |
title_full_unstemmed | VARIABLES OF QUANTIFYING REPUTATIONAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM UNFAIR COMPETITION ACTIONS |
title_short | VARIABLES OF QUANTIFYING REPUTATIONAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM UNFAIR COMPETITION ACTIONS |
title_sort | variables of quantifying reputational damages resulting from unfair competition actions |
topic | quantification assessment harm damage unfair competition criteria methodology |
url | https://csei.ase.md/journal/files/issue_101/EEJRS_Issue10.1_page-120-136.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iulianmoraru variablesofquantifyingreputationaldamagesresultingfromunfaircompetitionactions |