Comparative analysis of traditional and automated financial management methods

The article examines the problems of using traditional and automated methods of financial management, the relevance of which is due to the rapid digital transformation, which creates the need to rethink the methodological foundations. In science, there is a contradiction between established classica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. A. Frolov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Entrepreneurship 2024-12-01
Series:Путеводитель предпринимателя
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pp-mag.ru/jour/article/view/2023
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839585882248577024
author E. A. Frolov
author_facet E. A. Frolov
author_sort E. A. Frolov
collection DOAJ
description The article examines the problems of using traditional and automated methods of financial management, the relevance of which is due to the rapid digital transformation, which creates the need to rethink the methodological foundations. In science, there is a contradiction between established classical management practices and new capabilities of automated systems, which creates uncertainty when choosing optimal approaches to the organization of financial processes. The purpose of the study is to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of the management methods under consideration based on a system of criteria (methodology for processing financial information, time characteristics of accounting processes, structure of information flows, mechanisms for controlling operations, principles of reporting, organization of analytical accounting, decision–making procedures, data integration, system scalability, documentation support). The author’s vision of the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of classical options and automation is formulated. It was possible to conclude that the fundamental differences between the characterized methods are determined not only by technological potential, but also by fundamentally different approaches to the organization of information processes. At the same time, the identified differences do not exclude the possibility of methodological integration, provided that the basic principles of financial management are preserved. The presented materials are of practical value to the heads of financial departments, accounting process methodologists, developers of automated management systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-d1c80b73e47f445a9a11b0c6437acee3
institution Matheson Library
issn 2073-9885
2687-136X
language Russian
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Russian Academy of Entrepreneurship
record_format Article
series Путеводитель предпринимателя
spelling doaj-art-d1c80b73e47f445a9a11b0c6437acee32025-08-03T19:29:32ZrusRussian Academy of EntrepreneurshipПутеводитель предпринимателя2073-98852687-136X2024-12-01174394710.24182/2073-9885-2024-17-4-39-471743Comparative analysis of traditional and automated financial management methodsE. A. Frolov0Evolution ManagementThe article examines the problems of using traditional and automated methods of financial management, the relevance of which is due to the rapid digital transformation, which creates the need to rethink the methodological foundations. In science, there is a contradiction between established classical management practices and new capabilities of automated systems, which creates uncertainty when choosing optimal approaches to the organization of financial processes. The purpose of the study is to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of the management methods under consideration based on a system of criteria (methodology for processing financial information, time characteristics of accounting processes, structure of information flows, mechanisms for controlling operations, principles of reporting, organization of analytical accounting, decision–making procedures, data integration, system scalability, documentation support). The author’s vision of the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of classical options and automation is formulated. It was possible to conclude that the fundamental differences between the characterized methods are determined not only by technological potential, but also by fundamentally different approaches to the organization of information processes. At the same time, the identified differences do not exclude the possibility of methodological integration, provided that the basic principles of financial management are preserved. The presented materials are of practical value to the heads of financial departments, accounting process methodologists, developers of automated management systems.https://www.pp-mag.ru/jour/article/view/2023automationanalytical accountingdocument managementinformation flowssystem scalabilitymanagement methodologyreportingdecision–makingfinancial managementdigitalization
spellingShingle E. A. Frolov
Comparative analysis of traditional and automated financial management methods
Путеводитель предпринимателя
automation
analytical accounting
document management
information flows
system scalability
management methodology
reporting
decision–making
financial management
digitalization
title Comparative analysis of traditional and automated financial management methods
title_full Comparative analysis of traditional and automated financial management methods
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of traditional and automated financial management methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of traditional and automated financial management methods
title_short Comparative analysis of traditional and automated financial management methods
title_sort comparative analysis of traditional and automated financial management methods
topic automation
analytical accounting
document management
information flows
system scalability
management methodology
reporting
decision–making
financial management
digitalization
url https://www.pp-mag.ru/jour/article/view/2023
work_keys_str_mv AT eafrolov comparativeanalysisoftraditionalandautomatedfinancialmanagementmethods