Comparative Analysis Supporting Cohesion Policy Evaluation Based on STeMA Model: Insights from Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna
This paper illustrates the work of the Florence Research unit, in particular the intermediate work of selection of indicators related to the topic “productivity”, for their inclusion in the STeMA model for the evaluation of territorial cohesion policies. As already indicated in the first working pap...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Firenze University Press
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/bsgi/article/view/747 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839597053510942720 |
|---|---|
| author | Francesco Dini Silvia Grandi Federico Martellozzo Filippo Randelli Patrizia Romei |
| author_facet | Francesco Dini Silvia Grandi Federico Martellozzo Filippo Randelli Patrizia Romei |
| author_sort | Francesco Dini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper illustrates the work of the Florence Research unit, in particular the intermediate work of selection of indicators related to the topic “productivity”, for their inclusion in the STeMA model for the evaluation of territorial cohesion policies. As already indicated in the first working paper of this PRIN, we have combined for this selection the concept of “productivity” with that of “territorial competitiveness”, more correct for a survey about geographical economies (NUTS 3) as unit of analysis. The selection identified around 250 indicators, which were progressively reduced through a screening process. At the end, 12 indicators were included in the STeMA model. We have subsequently discussed the NUTS 3 geographical distribution of some of these indicators, inserting them within a synthetic reconstruction of the regional articulation of Italian development. Then we discussed deeper the cases of Tuscany and Emilia Romagna, emphasizing the aspects of analogy and diversity, both in the development model and in territorial policies. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cfe8cbe7c2694d96b069b27ea0d311cf |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 1121-7820 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Firenze University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana |
| spelling | doaj-art-cfe8cbe7c2694d96b069b27ea0d311cf2025-08-02T19:55:25ZengFirenze University PressBollettino della Società Geografica Italiana1121-78202020-06-012310.13128/bsgi.v2i3.747Comparative Analysis Supporting Cohesion Policy Evaluation Based on STeMA Model: Insights from Tuscany and Emilia-RomagnaFrancesco Dini0Silvia Grandi1Federico Martellozzo2Filippo Randelli3Patrizia Romei4Dipartimento di Scienze per l’Economia e l’Impresa, Università degli Studi di Firenze, ItalyMinistero dello sviluppo economico, Rome, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze per l’Economia e l’Impresa, Università degli Studi di Firenze, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze per l’Economia e l’Impresa, Università degli Studi di Firenze, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze per l’Economia e l’Impresa, Università degli Studi di Firenze, ItalyThis paper illustrates the work of the Florence Research unit, in particular the intermediate work of selection of indicators related to the topic “productivity”, for their inclusion in the STeMA model for the evaluation of territorial cohesion policies. As already indicated in the first working paper of this PRIN, we have combined for this selection the concept of “productivity” with that of “territorial competitiveness”, more correct for a survey about geographical economies (NUTS 3) as unit of analysis. The selection identified around 250 indicators, which were progressively reduced through a screening process. At the end, 12 indicators were included in the STeMA model. We have subsequently discussed the NUTS 3 geographical distribution of some of these indicators, inserting them within a synthetic reconstruction of the regional articulation of Italian development. Then we discussed deeper the cases of Tuscany and Emilia Romagna, emphasizing the aspects of analogy and diversity, both in the development model and in territorial policies.https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/bsgi/article/view/747productivitycompetitivenessindicatorsregional developmentterritorial policies |
| spellingShingle | Francesco Dini Silvia Grandi Federico Martellozzo Filippo Randelli Patrizia Romei Comparative Analysis Supporting Cohesion Policy Evaluation Based on STeMA Model: Insights from Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana productivity competitiveness indicators regional development territorial policies |
| title | Comparative Analysis Supporting Cohesion Policy Evaluation Based on STeMA Model: Insights from Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna |
| title_full | Comparative Analysis Supporting Cohesion Policy Evaluation Based on STeMA Model: Insights from Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis Supporting Cohesion Policy Evaluation Based on STeMA Model: Insights from Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis Supporting Cohesion Policy Evaluation Based on STeMA Model: Insights from Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna |
| title_short | Comparative Analysis Supporting Cohesion Policy Evaluation Based on STeMA Model: Insights from Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna |
| title_sort | comparative analysis supporting cohesion policy evaluation based on stema model insights from tuscany and emilia romagna |
| topic | productivity competitiveness indicators regional development territorial policies |
| url | https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/bsgi/article/view/747 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francescodini comparativeanalysissupportingcohesionpolicyevaluationbasedonstemamodelinsightsfromtuscanyandemiliaromagna AT silviagrandi comparativeanalysissupportingcohesionpolicyevaluationbasedonstemamodelinsightsfromtuscanyandemiliaromagna AT federicomartellozzo comparativeanalysissupportingcohesionpolicyevaluationbasedonstemamodelinsightsfromtuscanyandemiliaromagna AT filipporandelli comparativeanalysissupportingcohesionpolicyevaluationbasedonstemamodelinsightsfromtuscanyandemiliaromagna AT patriziaromei comparativeanalysissupportingcohesionpolicyevaluationbasedonstemamodelinsightsfromtuscanyandemiliaromagna |