Towards a Taxonomy of Hybrid Warfare: Lessons from Crimea and the Donbas
While “hybrid warfare” has attracted considerable interest among defense intellectuals for more than a decade, it still appears conceptually flawed. The main reason for this is that hybrid warfare remains a catch-all concept encompassing various types of actions. As such, the notion of hybrid warfa...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Carol I National Defence University Publishing House
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Bulletin of "Carol I" National Defense University |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revista.unap.ro/index.php/bulletin/article/view/2165 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | While “hybrid warfare” has attracted considerable interest among defense intellectuals for more than a decade, it still appears conceptually flawed. The main reason for this is that hybrid warfare remains a catch-all concept encompassing various types of actions. As such, the notion of hybrid warfare seems overly broad for academic analysis and national security planning. A classification of hybrid warfare is essential to distinguish its principal types. The research question for this article is, therefore: How can hybrid warfare be classified based on its modus operandi? In addressing this question, the article proposes a taxonomy based on David Kilcullen’s ideal types of counterinsurgency, namely, population-centric and enemy-centric models, given that hybrid warfare can manifest in two main forms, either as a direct challenge to military forces or as a malign influence on civilian populations and decision-makers. To illustrate this distinction, it examines two classic cases of the hybrid mode of warfare: Russia’s annexation of Crimea and covert occupation of the Donbas region. The findings suggest that Russia’s annexation of Crimea reflects a population-centric hybrid warfare approach, because it was essentially based mostly on non-violent actions rather than violent conflict. On the contrary, Russia’s covert occupation of the Donbas region indicates a more violent, enemy-centric model as it prioritizes military dominance.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2284-936X 2284-9378 |