Increase of Cardioprotective Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning during Cardiac Surgery

The objective. To increase the effectiveness of cardioprotection during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) by using a modified technique of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC).Subjects and Methods. A prospective randomized study included 119 patients (aged 18 to 75 years) undergoing on-pump C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. M. Radovskiy, A. E. Bautin, L. I. Karpova, A. O. Marichev, I. Yu. Ivanov, V. L. Etin, E. Yu. Vasilyeva, М. L. Ivanova, E. V. Batalina, V. K. Grebennik, D. A. Laletin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: New Terra Publishing House 2022-02-01
Series:Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vair-journal.com/jour/article/view/625
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839581136331735040
author A. M. Radovskiy
A. E. Bautin
L. I. Karpova
A. O. Marichev
I. Yu. Ivanov
V. L. Etin
E. Yu. Vasilyeva
М. L. Ivanova
E. V. Batalina
V. K. Grebennik
D. A. Laletin
author_facet A. M. Radovskiy
A. E. Bautin
L. I. Karpova
A. O. Marichev
I. Yu. Ivanov
V. L. Etin
E. Yu. Vasilyeva
М. L. Ivanova
E. V. Batalina
V. K. Grebennik
D. A. Laletin
author_sort A. M. Radovskiy
collection DOAJ
description The objective. To increase the effectiveness of cardioprotection during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) by using a modified technique of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC).Subjects and Methods. A prospective randomized study included 119 patients (aged 18 to 75 years) undergoing on-pump CABG. Patients were divided in 5 groups: Group 1 ‒ Sevoflurane control (ContrSevo), RIPC was not used, sevoflurane anesthesia (n = 24); Group 2 ‒ RIPC1 sevoflurane (RIP1Sevo), RIPC with ischemia-reperfusion of one lower limb, sevoflurane anesthesia (n = 26); Group 3 ‒ RIPC2 sevoflurane (RIP2Sevo), RIPC with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs, anesthesia sevoflurane (n = 23); Group 4 ‒ Propofol control (ContrProp), RIPC was not used, propofol anesthesia (n = 22); Group 5 ‒ RIPC2 propofol (RIP2Prop), RIPC with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs, propofol anesthesia (n = 24). The serum troponin I concentration (cTnI) (baseline, and 30 minutes, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours after СPB weaning). Hemodynamic parameters and indicators of the clinical postoperative course also were evaluated. The impact ischemic-reperfused tissue mass of RIPC on the cardioprotection was assessed by comparing the groups of ContrSevo, RIPC1Sevo, and RIPC2Sevo. To assess the impact of propofol on the RIPC-induced cardioprotection, the groups of ContrProp and RIPC2Prop were compared.Results. Statistically significant differences in cTnI were found between the ContrSevo and the RIPC2Sevo at points of 12, 24 and 36 hours: ContrSevo 1.83 (1.3; 2.24) ng/ml, RIP2Sevo 1.28 (0.75; 1.63) ng/ml after 12 hours (p = 0.02), ContrSevo 1.44 (0.98; 2.26) ng/ml, RIPC2Sevo 1.17 (0.55; 1.66) ng/ml after 24 hours (p = 0.046), ContrSevo 1.26 (0.86; 1.72) ng/ml, and RIPC2Sevo 0.81 (0.47; 1.24) ng/ml after 36 hours (p = 0.035). No differences in the cTnI were found between the groups of ContrSevo and RIPC1Sevo, RIPC1Sevo and RIPC2Sevo at any stage of the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups when comparing hemodynamic parameters. In the RIPC2Sevo Group, arrhythmias requiring cardioversion or drug therapy were significantly less frequent compared to ContrSevo (1 vs. 6) (p = 0.047). There were no other significant differences in the postoperative clinical course. When comparing the groups of ContrProp and RIP2Prop, no significant differences were found in cTnI and hemodynamic parameters as well as in the postoperative clinical course.Conclusions. A greater mass of ischemic-reperfused peripheral tissue is accompanied by greater RIPC-induced cardioprotection. A modified protocol for RIPC with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs with sevoflurane anesthesia enhances cardioprotection during on-pump CABG. The modified RIPC protocol with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs with sevoflurane anesthesia reduces the risk of arrhythmias requiring cardioversion or drug therapy. Propofol inhibits the RIPC-induced cardioprotection with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs.
format Article
id doaj-art-cbafbc84a3ff4cd7aeab21ec2e6af5b5
institution Matheson Library
issn 2078-5658
2541-8653
language Russian
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher New Terra Publishing House
record_format Article
series Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии
spelling doaj-art-cbafbc84a3ff4cd7aeab21ec2e6af5b52025-08-04T10:20:47ZrusNew Terra Publishing HouseВестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии2078-56582541-86532022-02-01191405110.21292/2078-5658-2022-19-1-40-51496Increase of Cardioprotective Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning during Cardiac SurgeryA. M. Radovskiy0A. E. Bautin1L. I. Karpova2A. O. Marichev3I. Yu. Ivanov4V. L. Etin5E. Yu. Vasilyeva6М. L. Ivanova7E. V. Batalina8V. K. Grebennik9D. A. Laletin10Almazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterAlmazov National Medical Research CenterThe objective. To increase the effectiveness of cardioprotection during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) by using a modified technique of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC).Subjects and Methods. A prospective randomized study included 119 patients (aged 18 to 75 years) undergoing on-pump CABG. Patients were divided in 5 groups: Group 1 ‒ Sevoflurane control (ContrSevo), RIPC was not used, sevoflurane anesthesia (n = 24); Group 2 ‒ RIPC1 sevoflurane (RIP1Sevo), RIPC with ischemia-reperfusion of one lower limb, sevoflurane anesthesia (n = 26); Group 3 ‒ RIPC2 sevoflurane (RIP2Sevo), RIPC with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs, anesthesia sevoflurane (n = 23); Group 4 ‒ Propofol control (ContrProp), RIPC was not used, propofol anesthesia (n = 22); Group 5 ‒ RIPC2 propofol (RIP2Prop), RIPC with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs, propofol anesthesia (n = 24). The serum troponin I concentration (cTnI) (baseline, and 30 minutes, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours after СPB weaning). Hemodynamic parameters and indicators of the clinical postoperative course also were evaluated. The impact ischemic-reperfused tissue mass of RIPC on the cardioprotection was assessed by comparing the groups of ContrSevo, RIPC1Sevo, and RIPC2Sevo. To assess the impact of propofol on the RIPC-induced cardioprotection, the groups of ContrProp and RIPC2Prop were compared.Results. Statistically significant differences in cTnI were found between the ContrSevo and the RIPC2Sevo at points of 12, 24 and 36 hours: ContrSevo 1.83 (1.3; 2.24) ng/ml, RIP2Sevo 1.28 (0.75; 1.63) ng/ml after 12 hours (p = 0.02), ContrSevo 1.44 (0.98; 2.26) ng/ml, RIPC2Sevo 1.17 (0.55; 1.66) ng/ml after 24 hours (p = 0.046), ContrSevo 1.26 (0.86; 1.72) ng/ml, and RIPC2Sevo 0.81 (0.47; 1.24) ng/ml after 36 hours (p = 0.035). No differences in the cTnI were found between the groups of ContrSevo and RIPC1Sevo, RIPC1Sevo and RIPC2Sevo at any stage of the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups when comparing hemodynamic parameters. In the RIPC2Sevo Group, arrhythmias requiring cardioversion or drug therapy were significantly less frequent compared to ContrSevo (1 vs. 6) (p = 0.047). There were no other significant differences in the postoperative clinical course. When comparing the groups of ContrProp and RIP2Prop, no significant differences were found in cTnI and hemodynamic parameters as well as in the postoperative clinical course.Conclusions. A greater mass of ischemic-reperfused peripheral tissue is accompanied by greater RIPC-induced cardioprotection. A modified protocol for RIPC with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs with sevoflurane anesthesia enhances cardioprotection during on-pump CABG. The modified RIPC protocol with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs with sevoflurane anesthesia reduces the risk of arrhythmias requiring cardioversion or drug therapy. Propofol inhibits the RIPC-induced cardioprotection with ischemia-reperfusion of two lower limbs.https://www.vair-journal.com/jour/article/view/625remote ischemic preconditioningcardiac surgerycardioprotectioncoronary artery bypass grafting
spellingShingle A. M. Radovskiy
A. E. Bautin
L. I. Karpova
A. O. Marichev
I. Yu. Ivanov
V. L. Etin
E. Yu. Vasilyeva
М. L. Ivanova
E. V. Batalina
V. K. Grebennik
D. A. Laletin
Increase of Cardioprotective Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning during Cardiac Surgery
Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии
remote ischemic preconditioning
cardiac surgery
cardioprotection
coronary artery bypass grafting
title Increase of Cardioprotective Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning during Cardiac Surgery
title_full Increase of Cardioprotective Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning during Cardiac Surgery
title_fullStr Increase of Cardioprotective Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning during Cardiac Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Increase of Cardioprotective Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning during Cardiac Surgery
title_short Increase of Cardioprotective Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning during Cardiac Surgery
title_sort increase of cardioprotective effectiveness of remote ischemic preconditioning during cardiac surgery
topic remote ischemic preconditioning
cardiac surgery
cardioprotection
coronary artery bypass grafting
url https://www.vair-journal.com/jour/article/view/625
work_keys_str_mv AT amradovskiy increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT aebautin increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT likarpova increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT aomarichev increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT iyuivanov increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT vletin increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT eyuvasilyeva increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT mlivanova increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT evbatalina increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT vkgrebennik increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery
AT dalaletin increaseofcardioprotectiveeffectivenessofremoteischemicpreconditioningduringcardiacsurgery