Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.

<h4>Background</h4>Core outcome sets (COS) comprise a minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all trials for a specific health condition. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative maintains an up to date, publicly accessible online datab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine Davis, Sarah L Gorst, Nicola Harman, Valerie Smith, Elizabeth Gargon, Douglas G Altman, Jane M Blazeby, Mike Clarke, Sean Tunis, Paula R Williamson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190695
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Similar Items