Field Evaluation of Different Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems Applied to Control <i>Panonychus citri</i> in Mountainous Citrus Orchards
In mountainous citrus orchards, the application of conventional ground sprayers for the control of citrus red mite (<i>Panonychus citri</i>) is often constrained by complex terrain and low operational efficiency. The Unmanned Aerial Spraying System (UASS), due to its low-altitude, low-vo...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Agriculture |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1283 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1839655153689427968 |
|---|---|
| author | Zongyin Cui Li Cui Xiaojing Yan Yifang Han Weiguang Yang Yilong Zhan Jiapei Wu Yingdong Qin Pengchao Chen Yubin Lan |
| author_facet | Zongyin Cui Li Cui Xiaojing Yan Yifang Han Weiguang Yang Yilong Zhan Jiapei Wu Yingdong Qin Pengchao Chen Yubin Lan |
| author_sort | Zongyin Cui |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In mountainous citrus orchards, the application of conventional ground sprayers for the control of citrus red mite (<i>Panonychus citri</i>) is often constrained by complex terrain and low operational efficiency. The Unmanned Aerial Spraying System (UASS), due to its low-altitude, low-volume, and high-maneuverability characteristics, has emerged as a promising alternative for pest management in such challenging environments. To evaluate the spray performance and field efficacy of different UASS types in controlling <i>P. citri</i>, five representative UASS models (JX25, DP, T1000, E-A2021, and T20), four mainstream pesticide formulations, and four novel tank-mix adjuvants were systematically assessed in a field experiment conducted in a typical hilly citrus orchard. The results showed that T20 delivered the best overall spray deposition, with upper canopy coverage reaching 10.63%, a deposition of 3.01 μg/cm<sup>2</sup>, and the highest pesticide utilization (43.2%). E-A2021, equipped with a centrifugal nozzle, produced the finest droplets and highest droplet density (120.3–151.4 deposits/cm<sup>2</sup>), but its deposition and coverage were lowest due to drift. Nonetheless, it exhibited superior penetration (dIPR 72.3%, dDPR 73.5%), facilitating internal canopy coverage. T1000, operating at higher flight parameters, had the weakest deposition. Formulation type had a limited impact, with microemulsions (MEs) outperforming emulsifiable concentrates (ECs) and suspension concentrates (SCs). All adjuvants improved spray metrics, especially Yimanchu and Silwet, which enhanced pesticide utilization to 46.8% and 46.4% for E-A2021 and DP, respectively. Adjuvant use increased utilization by 4.6–11.9%, but also raised ground losses by 1.5–4.2%, except for Yimanchu, which reduced ground loss by 2.3%. In terms of control effect, the rapid efficacy (1–7 days after application, DAA) of UASS spraying was slightly lower than that of ground sprayers—electric spray gun (ESG), while its residual efficacy (14–25 DAA) was slightly higher. The addition of adjuvants improved both rapid and residual efficacy, making it comparable to or even better than ESG. E-A2021 with 5% abamectin·etoxazole ME (5A·E) and Yimanchu achieved 97.4% efficacy at 25 DAA. Among UASSs, T20 showed the rapid control, while E-A2021 outperformed JX25 and T1000 due to finer droplets effectively targeting <i>P. citri</i>. In residual control (14–25 DAA), JX25 with 45% bifenazate·etoxazole SC (45B·E) was most effective, followed by T20. 5A·E and 45B·E showed better residual efficacy than abamectin-based formulations, which declined more rapidly. Adjuvants significantly extended control duration, with Yimanchu performing best. This study demonstrates that with optimized spraying parameters, nozzle types, and adjuvants, UASSs can match or surpass ground spraying in <i>P. citri</i> control in hilly citrus orchards, providing valuable guidance for precision pesticide application in complex terrain. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c085d0e4ad964e0f85a1f10f0bb5e7d3 |
| institution | Matheson Library |
| issn | 2077-0472 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Agriculture |
| spelling | doaj-art-c085d0e4ad964e0f85a1f10f0bb5e7d32025-06-25T13:19:47ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722025-06-011512128310.3390/agriculture15121283Field Evaluation of Different Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems Applied to Control <i>Panonychus citri</i> in Mountainous Citrus OrchardsZongyin Cui0Li Cui1Xiaojing Yan2Yifang Han3Weiguang Yang4Yilong Zhan5Jiapei Wu6Yingdong Qin7Pengchao Chen8Yubin Lan9National Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, ChinaState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, ChinaNational Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaNational Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaNational Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaNational Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaNational Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaNational Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaNational Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaIn mountainous citrus orchards, the application of conventional ground sprayers for the control of citrus red mite (<i>Panonychus citri</i>) is often constrained by complex terrain and low operational efficiency. The Unmanned Aerial Spraying System (UASS), due to its low-altitude, low-volume, and high-maneuverability characteristics, has emerged as a promising alternative for pest management in such challenging environments. To evaluate the spray performance and field efficacy of different UASS types in controlling <i>P. citri</i>, five representative UASS models (JX25, DP, T1000, E-A2021, and T20), four mainstream pesticide formulations, and four novel tank-mix adjuvants were systematically assessed in a field experiment conducted in a typical hilly citrus orchard. The results showed that T20 delivered the best overall spray deposition, with upper canopy coverage reaching 10.63%, a deposition of 3.01 μg/cm<sup>2</sup>, and the highest pesticide utilization (43.2%). E-A2021, equipped with a centrifugal nozzle, produced the finest droplets and highest droplet density (120.3–151.4 deposits/cm<sup>2</sup>), but its deposition and coverage were lowest due to drift. Nonetheless, it exhibited superior penetration (dIPR 72.3%, dDPR 73.5%), facilitating internal canopy coverage. T1000, operating at higher flight parameters, had the weakest deposition. Formulation type had a limited impact, with microemulsions (MEs) outperforming emulsifiable concentrates (ECs) and suspension concentrates (SCs). All adjuvants improved spray metrics, especially Yimanchu and Silwet, which enhanced pesticide utilization to 46.8% and 46.4% for E-A2021 and DP, respectively. Adjuvant use increased utilization by 4.6–11.9%, but also raised ground losses by 1.5–4.2%, except for Yimanchu, which reduced ground loss by 2.3%. In terms of control effect, the rapid efficacy (1–7 days after application, DAA) of UASS spraying was slightly lower than that of ground sprayers—electric spray gun (ESG), while its residual efficacy (14–25 DAA) was slightly higher. The addition of adjuvants improved both rapid and residual efficacy, making it comparable to or even better than ESG. E-A2021 with 5% abamectin·etoxazole ME (5A·E) and Yimanchu achieved 97.4% efficacy at 25 DAA. Among UASSs, T20 showed the rapid control, while E-A2021 outperformed JX25 and T1000 due to finer droplets effectively targeting <i>P. citri</i>. In residual control (14–25 DAA), JX25 with 45% bifenazate·etoxazole SC (45B·E) was most effective, followed by T20. 5A·E and 45B·E showed better residual efficacy than abamectin-based formulations, which declined more rapidly. Adjuvants significantly extended control duration, with Yimanchu performing best. This study demonstrates that with optimized spraying parameters, nozzle types, and adjuvants, UASSs can match or surpass ground spraying in <i>P. citri</i> control in hilly citrus orchards, providing valuable guidance for precision pesticide application in complex terrain.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1283<i>Panonychus citri</i>unmanned aerial spraying systemspray performancecontrol effect |
| spellingShingle | Zongyin Cui Li Cui Xiaojing Yan Yifang Han Weiguang Yang Yilong Zhan Jiapei Wu Yingdong Qin Pengchao Chen Yubin Lan Field Evaluation of Different Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems Applied to Control <i>Panonychus citri</i> in Mountainous Citrus Orchards Agriculture <i>Panonychus citri</i> unmanned aerial spraying system spray performance control effect |
| title | Field Evaluation of Different Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems Applied to Control <i>Panonychus citri</i> in Mountainous Citrus Orchards |
| title_full | Field Evaluation of Different Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems Applied to Control <i>Panonychus citri</i> in Mountainous Citrus Orchards |
| title_fullStr | Field Evaluation of Different Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems Applied to Control <i>Panonychus citri</i> in Mountainous Citrus Orchards |
| title_full_unstemmed | Field Evaluation of Different Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems Applied to Control <i>Panonychus citri</i> in Mountainous Citrus Orchards |
| title_short | Field Evaluation of Different Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems Applied to Control <i>Panonychus citri</i> in Mountainous Citrus Orchards |
| title_sort | field evaluation of different unmanned aerial spraying systems applied to control i panonychus citri i in mountainous citrus orchards |
| topic | <i>Panonychus citri</i> unmanned aerial spraying system spray performance control effect |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1283 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zongyincui fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards AT licui fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards AT xiaojingyan fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards AT yifanghan fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards AT weiguangyang fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards AT yilongzhan fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards AT jiapeiwu fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards AT yingdongqin fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards AT pengchaochen fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards AT yubinlan fieldevaluationofdifferentunmannedaerialsprayingsystemsappliedtocontrolipanonychuscitriiinmountainouscitrusorchards |