The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis

Background. Laparostomy (open abdomen) is an aggressive surgical treatment of peritonitis and it requires justification of its effectiveness. Aims. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of laparostomy and planned rehabilitation in patients with common purulent peritonitis.Materials...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yaroslav M. Leshchishin, Ildar G. Mugatasimov, Andrey I. Baranov, Konstantin V. Potekhin, Sergey A. Yaroshchuk
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems 2019-04-01
Series:Acta Biomedica Scientifica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/1986
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839611991538270208
author Yaroslav M. Leshchishin
Ildar G. Mugatasimov
Andrey I. Baranov
Konstantin V. Potekhin
Sergey A. Yaroshchuk
author_facet Yaroslav M. Leshchishin
Ildar G. Mugatasimov
Andrey I. Baranov
Konstantin V. Potekhin
Sergey A. Yaroshchuk
author_sort Yaroslav M. Leshchishin
collection DOAJ
description Background. Laparostomy (open abdomen) is an aggressive surgical treatment of peritonitis and it requires justification of its effectiveness. Aims. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of laparostomy and planned rehabilitation in patients with common purulent peritonitis.Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of the results of laparostomy and planned sanations in patients with common purulent peritonitis. The study included 101 case histories. Inclusion criteria: generalized purulent peritonitis established in the primary surgical intervention that required the implementation of laparotomy. The excluded from the study were immunocompromised patients, hemodialysis patients, patients with pancreatic necrosis, closed abdominal trauma, class C liver cirrhosis, carcinomatosis, cancer cachexia, disseminated tuberculosis, total mesenteric thrombosis. In statistic processing we used indicators of median and inter quartile ranges, methods of nonparametric statistics (Mann – Whitney criterion). The level of significance was α = 0.05.Results. The whole group is divided into three subgroups according to MPI: subgroup I – 20 people, subgroup II – 57, subgroup III – 24. The method of planned sanation of the abdominal cavity in combination with laparostomy was applied in 34 cases (33.6 %). In the first subgroup in two cases (10 %), in the second – in 18 (31.6 %), in the third – 14 (58.3 %). The deceased, regardless of the chosen surgical technique, were characterized by higher values of integral scales. The severity of the condition of the surviving patients in which the technique was used at the time of admission was significantly higher than the severity of the surviving patients, in which laparostomy SAPS II was not used (p = 0.4716). However, their age was significantly older (p = 0.5476). The deceased patients were older 60 years with high rates on the above mentioned integrated scales.Conclusions. The results showed that patients older than 60 years, II & III on MPI and with high values of integral scales require more balanced and differential approach when using laparostomy (open abdomen).
format Article
id doaj-art-c05d268c6c2a4a768bb78b08e977c9d6
institution Matheson Library
issn 2541-9420
2587-9596
language Russian
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
record_format Article
series Acta Biomedica Scientifica
spelling doaj-art-c05d268c6c2a4a768bb78b08e977c9d62025-07-28T14:03:23ZrusScientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction ProblemsActa Biomedica Scientifica2541-94202587-95962019-04-014110711310.29413/ABS.2019-4.1.161842The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent PeritonitisYaroslav M. Leshchishin0Ildar G. Mugatasimov1Andrey I. Baranov2Konstantin V. Potekhin3Sergey A. Yaroshchuk4Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital N 1Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital N 1Novokuznetsk State Institute of Advanced Medical Training – Branch Campus of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional EducationNovokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital N 22Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital N 29Background. Laparostomy (open abdomen) is an aggressive surgical treatment of peritonitis and it requires justification of its effectiveness. Aims. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of laparostomy and planned rehabilitation in patients with common purulent peritonitis.Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of the results of laparostomy and planned sanations in patients with common purulent peritonitis. The study included 101 case histories. Inclusion criteria: generalized purulent peritonitis established in the primary surgical intervention that required the implementation of laparotomy. The excluded from the study were immunocompromised patients, hemodialysis patients, patients with pancreatic necrosis, closed abdominal trauma, class C liver cirrhosis, carcinomatosis, cancer cachexia, disseminated tuberculosis, total mesenteric thrombosis. In statistic processing we used indicators of median and inter quartile ranges, methods of nonparametric statistics (Mann – Whitney criterion). The level of significance was α = 0.05.Results. The whole group is divided into three subgroups according to MPI: subgroup I – 20 people, subgroup II – 57, subgroup III – 24. The method of planned sanation of the abdominal cavity in combination with laparostomy was applied in 34 cases (33.6 %). In the first subgroup in two cases (10 %), in the second – in 18 (31.6 %), in the third – 14 (58.3 %). The deceased, regardless of the chosen surgical technique, were characterized by higher values of integral scales. The severity of the condition of the surviving patients in which the technique was used at the time of admission was significantly higher than the severity of the surviving patients, in which laparostomy SAPS II was not used (p = 0.4716). However, their age was significantly older (p = 0.5476). The deceased patients were older 60 years with high rates on the above mentioned integrated scales.Conclusions. The results showed that patients older than 60 years, II & III on MPI and with high values of integral scales require more balanced and differential approach when using laparostomy (open abdomen).https://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/1986generalized purulent peritonitislaparostomyplanned sanitationmannheim peritonitis index
spellingShingle Yaroslav M. Leshchishin
Ildar G. Mugatasimov
Andrey I. Baranov
Konstantin V. Potekhin
Sergey A. Yaroshchuk
The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis
Acta Biomedica Scientifica
generalized purulent peritonitis
laparostomy
planned sanitation
mannheim peritonitis index
title The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis
title_full The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis
title_fullStr The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis
title_full_unstemmed The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis
title_short The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis
title_sort results of the planned relaparotomy and laparostomy in treatment of generalized purulent peritonitis
topic generalized purulent peritonitis
laparostomy
planned sanitation
mannheim peritonitis index
url https://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/1986
work_keys_str_mv AT yaroslavmleshchishin theresultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis
AT ildargmugatasimov theresultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis
AT andreyibaranov theresultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis
AT konstantinvpotekhin theresultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis
AT sergeyayaroshchuk theresultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis
AT yaroslavmleshchishin resultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis
AT ildargmugatasimov resultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis
AT andreyibaranov resultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis
AT konstantinvpotekhin resultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis
AT sergeyayaroshchuk resultsoftheplannedrelaparotomyandlaparostomyintreatmentofgeneralizedpurulentperitonitis