Cost-effectiveness analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19

Objective: This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) versus the standard of care (SoC) for patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at high risk for progression to severe illness from the perspective of the Italian National Healt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carolina Moreno, Andrea Aiello, Roberto Di Virgilio, Valentina Mazzotta, Andrea Antinori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AboutScience Srl 2025-07-01
Series:Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/3403
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839626349110624256
author Carolina Moreno
Andrea Aiello
Roberto Di Virgilio
Valentina Mazzotta
Andrea Antinori
author_facet Carolina Moreno
Andrea Aiello
Roberto Di Virgilio
Valentina Mazzotta
Andrea Antinori
author_sort Carolina Moreno
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) versus the standard of care (SoC) for patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at high risk for progression to severe illness from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was developed using a closed cohort of 1,000 infected patients. It employed a short-term decision tree (1 year) followed by a lifetime 2-state Markov model (alive and dead). The short-term decision tree captured costs and outcomes associated with the primary infection and healthcare utilization; survivors of the short-term decision tree were followed until death to calculate Italian quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), adjusted in the short-term for survivors to mechanical ventilation. Baseline hospitalization rate and NMV/r effectiveness were sourced from the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) and the randomized clinical trial Evaluation of Protease Inhibition for COVID-19 in High-Risk Patients (EPIC-HR), respectively. Other inputs were given by previous COVID-19 studies and publicly available sources. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for all model inputs to test the robustness of the results of the model. Results: NMV/r presented an advantageous cost-effectiveness ratio of 2,237 €/QALY, compared to the SoC, in the long-term horizon (30 years). Results were most sensitive to baseline risk of hospitalization and NMV/r treatment effectiveness parameters. The probabilistic analysis indicated that NMV/r has a 100% probability of being costeffective at a 33,004 € willingness-to-pay threshold. Conclusions: From the Italian National Health Service perspective, NMV/r is cost-effective compared to the standard of care for patients at high risk for severe COVID-19.
format Article
id doaj-art-bdfff03896b44cf8a9f17a878996d4e5
institution Matheson Library
issn 2284-2403
2283-5733
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher AboutScience Srl
record_format Article
series Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
spelling doaj-art-bdfff03896b44cf8a9f17a878996d4e52025-07-17T14:21:48ZengAboutScience SrlGlobal & Regional Health Technology Assessment2284-24032283-57332025-07-0111110.33393/grhta.2024.3403Cost-effectiveness analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19Carolina Moreno0Andrea Aiello1Roberto Di Virgilio2Valentina Mazzotta3Andrea Antinori4PharmaLex Italy SpA, Milano - ItalyPharmaLex Italy SpA, Milano - ItalyPfizer Italia, Roma - ItalyNational Institute for Infectious Diseases L. Spallanzani, IRCCS, Roma - ItalyNational Institute for Infectious Diseases L. Spallanzani, IRCCS, Roma - Italy Objective: This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) versus the standard of care (SoC) for patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at high risk for progression to severe illness from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was developed using a closed cohort of 1,000 infected patients. It employed a short-term decision tree (1 year) followed by a lifetime 2-state Markov model (alive and dead). The short-term decision tree captured costs and outcomes associated with the primary infection and healthcare utilization; survivors of the short-term decision tree were followed until death to calculate Italian quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), adjusted in the short-term for survivors to mechanical ventilation. Baseline hospitalization rate and NMV/r effectiveness were sourced from the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) and the randomized clinical trial Evaluation of Protease Inhibition for COVID-19 in High-Risk Patients (EPIC-HR), respectively. Other inputs were given by previous COVID-19 studies and publicly available sources. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for all model inputs to test the robustness of the results of the model. Results: NMV/r presented an advantageous cost-effectiveness ratio of 2,237 €/QALY, compared to the SoC, in the long-term horizon (30 years). Results were most sensitive to baseline risk of hospitalization and NMV/r treatment effectiveness parameters. The probabilistic analysis indicated that NMV/r has a 100% probability of being costeffective at a 33,004 € willingness-to-pay threshold. Conclusions: From the Italian National Health Service perspective, NMV/r is cost-effective compared to the standard of care for patients at high risk for severe COVID-19. https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/3403Cost-effectiveness analysisCost-utility analysisCOVID-19Italynirmatrelvir/ritonavir
spellingShingle Carolina Moreno
Andrea Aiello
Roberto Di Virgilio
Valentina Mazzotta
Andrea Antinori
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Cost-utility analysis
COVID-19
Italy
nirmatrelvir/ritonavir
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of nirmatrelvir ritonavir in adult patients at high risk of progressing to severe covid 19
topic Cost-effectiveness analysis
Cost-utility analysis
COVID-19
Italy
nirmatrelvir/ritonavir
url https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/3403
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinamoreno costeffectivenessanalysisofnirmatrelvirritonavirinadultpatientsathighriskofprogressingtoseverecovid19
AT andreaaiello costeffectivenessanalysisofnirmatrelvirritonavirinadultpatientsathighriskofprogressingtoseverecovid19
AT robertodivirgilio costeffectivenessanalysisofnirmatrelvirritonavirinadultpatientsathighriskofprogressingtoseverecovid19
AT valentinamazzotta costeffectivenessanalysisofnirmatrelvirritonavirinadultpatientsathighriskofprogressingtoseverecovid19
AT andreaantinori costeffectivenessanalysisofnirmatrelvirritonavirinadultpatientsathighriskofprogressingtoseverecovid19