Comparison and Evaluation of Rain Gauge, CMORPH, TRMM PR and GPM DPR KuPR Precipitation Products over South China
Remote sensing precipitation products are essential for the systematic analysis of precipitation characteristics and changes. This study conducts a comparative evaluation of precipitation products from rain gauge stations, Climate Prediction Center morphing technique (CMORPH), Tropical Rainfall Meas...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Article |
| 語言: | 英语 |
| 出版: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| 叢編: | Remote Sensing |
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/12/2040 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| 總結: | Remote sensing precipitation products are essential for the systematic analysis of precipitation characteristics and changes. This study conducts a comparative evaluation of precipitation products from rain gauge stations, Climate Prediction Center morphing technique (CMORPH), Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission precipitation radar (TRMM PR) version 7 and Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar Ku band (DPR KuPR) version 6 orbital observations during the common observational period (April–September 2014) across South China. The spatial patterns and probability density function of rain rates from four precipitation products show similar features. However, average rain rates from CMORPH (0.2–2.6 mm/h) tend to be smaller than those from rain gauge (0.1–4.4 mm/h) in temporal and spatial distribution. Conversely, average rain rates from TRMM PR and GPM KuPR (0.4–10.0 mm/h) are generally larger and exhibit more pronounced monthly changes. Despite notable differences in the number of detection samples, TRMM and GPM exhibit comparable spatiotemporal distributions and vertical structures, including rain-rate profiles, storm top heights and liquid (ice) water path. This confirms the consistency of space-borne precipitation radars and provides a foundation for analyzing long-term precipitation trends. Further analysis reveals that light rain rates from CMORPH have relatively small deviations, while rain rates generally tend to underestimate the rain rate compared to rain gauge. In contrast, TRMM PR and GPM KuPR tend to generally overestimate rain rates. Meanwhile, CMORPH (1.5–6.0 mm/h) shows larger deviations from rain gauge than TRMM and GPM, and the bias progressively increases as rain rates rise, as indicated by root mean square error results. Several statistical metrics suggest that although the missing detection rates of TRMM and GPM are higher than those of CMORPH (probability of detection 10–60%), their false detection rates are spatially lower (false alert ratio 10–30%) in Middle-East China. This study aims to provide valuable insights for enhancing precipitation retrieval algorithms and improving the applicability of remote sensing precipitation products. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2072-4292 |