Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Capacity Using the Integrated Ecosystem Services Index at Optimal Scale in Central Yunnan, China

ABSTRACT Understanding and quantifying the dynamic features of local ecosystem services (ESs) and integrating diverse ecosystem assessment results form crucial foundations for regional ES management. However, existing methods for integrating and objectively evaluating multiple ESs remain limited. Co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lanfang Liu, Jinliang Wang, Jie Li, Suling He, Yongcui Lan, Fang Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71222
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Understanding and quantifying the dynamic features of local ecosystem services (ESs) and integrating diverse ecosystem assessment results form crucial foundations for regional ES management. However, existing methods for integrating and objectively evaluating multiple ESs remain limited. Consequently, this research evaluates four key services based on the InVEST and RUSLE models in the Central Yunnan Province (CYP)—from 2000 to 2020: water yield (WY), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), and soil conservation (SC). It then constructs an Integrated Ecosystem Service Index (IESI) using principal component analysis (PCA). Additionally, this study explores the factors driving the spatial divergence of ESs by employing the optimal parameter‐based geographical detector model (OPGD) at the optimal spatial scale. The results indicated that (1) the IESI was effectively applied in the CYP and could quantitatively and comprehensively integrate the assessment results of the four key ESs. (2) During the study period, the ESs in the CYP showed increasing trends for WY, HQ, and SC, while CS showed a decreasing trend. (3) The IESI during the study period exhibited a trend of initially decreasing and then increasing. The average IESI values for CYP were 0.7338 in 2000, 0.6981 in 2005, 0.6947 in 2010, 0.6650 in 2015, and 0.6992 in 2020. (4) A 4500 m × 4500 m grid was identified as the optimal spatial scale for detecting the spatial divergence of comprehensive ecosystem service (CES) in CYP, and relief degree of land surface (RDLS), slope, and the NDVI were the top three drivers based on q‐values. This study offers a more scientific and effective method for evaluating regional CES. It also provides a comprehensive analytical tool for balancing land use competition and assessing the effectiveness of policy implementation.
ISSN:2045-7758